Goodness friggin gracious. Sub 20 avg, why do you avoid me?

Statistics for 04-19-2010 19:46:54

Average: 20.58
Standard Deviation: 0.92
Best Time: 18.33
Worst Time: DNF
Individual Times:
1. 19.25 U R2 D2 U' L R2 B2 F2 L' R U2 F' L' R2 F R2 F' R2 B2 D F' L2 D' U B'
2. (18.33) B' U2 B2 F R' D L R D' L R D U' B F' L2 D' B' F' L R2 D R F2 L
3. 20.35 B' R2 B U' F' D' U' L2 U2 B2 L' R2 B2 L' D' L2 R U' R2 B U' B2 L D' U
4. (DNF) B L D U2 B' U F2 R U R F D' L' R D U' L' R' D' L' R' B2 F L2 R2
5. 22.14 F2 L D' U L R' D' B2 L2 D U' F' L' R' D R2 F' D B R U' R2 B F' D

Video being uploaded.
 
I love the 2x2x2 because it's present in every cube. It's the angular corner stone.

Comming soon the reopening of my web page I'm still they owner of rubikscuberecord.com that I got for peanut in 2000. People can say what they want about me but I speak with facts and action. This that game was dead and I brought it back to life. And believe that I should have had more recognation than I did.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2mb0fLbSvQ
 
This may had been a full step, but i only noticed that i had a good f2l and a U perm.

I don't know about OLL though... Maybe it may had been a OLL skip...

15.86 D2 R' D2 R2 D2 F' U2 L' R D F' R2 B2 R' D' L R2 D' F2 R U D' B D2 L
 
3x3
Average of 5: 13.82 (SD = 0.51) [ Previous PB was: 14.95 ]
Times: (12.03), 13.30, 14.75, (16.55), 13.40
1. (12.03) B' U L2 R U' L2 R2 B' U F' D U' L' R2 D B2 D2 B2 F2 D' U F2 L' D U'
2. 13.30 D' F' L2 R' U2 B' F R2 U2 B L' F L' B D' L2 R' B F2 D2 U' F L2 R' B2
3. 14.75 D U B F L2 R B F L' R' B2 F' D2 F2 L F2 D2 R U B2 R2 B' R2 B2 U
4. (16.55) U' R2 D B' F L2 R U2 L2 U2 R' D U' F2 D U' F2 L F' L D U' L R B2
5. 13.40 B' D B2 F2 D F R2 B2 F' D2 U' R' B2 L2 R2 D' U' B' L2 U2 R D U' L' R'
The 12.03 was non-lucky btw. I think the LL was antisune+Z perm. I suck at Z perm so it could have been 11.xx if it was a different EPLL :p On the 16.55, I started PLL at around 11 but I locked up badly on a U perm.

Average of 12: 15.18 (SD = 1.17) [ Previous PB was: 15.73 ]
Times: (12.03), 13.30, 14.75, 16.55, 13.40, (18.18), 15.47, 17.06, 14.09, 15.52, 14.88, 16.81

Average of 100: 16.12 (SD = 1.35) [ Previous PB was: 16.70 ]
Best Time: 12.03
Worst Time: 20.75

Although my previous avg100 was 16.70, I've been averaging like 17.3 for the last week.
 
My first and probably last post in this thread.

After a very long and tedious period I have finally (after almost five months) learned full OLL.
It now starts to pay off, today I set a new PB avg 12 with 41.30. I miss only one OLL in ten or so.

And yes, that is 3x3 speed(:o), not anything else. Sub-40 seems finally possible.
 
My first and probably last post in this thread.

After a very long and tedious period I have finally (after almost five months) learned full OLL.
It now starts to pay off, today I set a new PB avg 12 with 41.30. I miss only one OLL in ten or so.

And yes, that is 3x3 speed(:o), not anything else. Sub-40 seems finally possible.

Do you know full PLL and intuitive F2L?
 
My first and probably last post in this thread.

After a very long and tedious period I have finally (after almost five months) learned full OLL.
It now starts to pay off, today I set a new PB avg 12 with 41.30. I miss only one OLL in ten or so.

And yes, that is 3x3 speed(:o), not anything else. Sub-40 seems finally possible.

Great job, Mats! Looks like you're going to beat me in our race.

My first and probably last post in this thread.

After a very long and tedious period I have finally (after almost five months) learned full OLL.
It now starts to pay off, today I set a new PB avg 12 with 41.30. I miss only one OLL in ten or so.

And yes, that is 3x3 speed(:o), not anything else. Sub-40 seems finally possible.

Do you know full PLL and intuitive F2L?

Yes, he does. For some reason, it seems a lot harder for us old folks to achieve fast results with the same methods you youngsters use. I don't know why. I got sub-30 by learning full OLL. Mats is a good bit older than me, and it looks like full OLL is what will get him sub-40.

We can eventually get there - look at Ton. But for some reason, it seems to take us a while to get fast. (Maybe it's just lack of practice time.) Anyway, I'm on my way to sub-20, and I WILL be there soon (by old-person standards, anyway). :)
 
Back
Top