soccerking813
Veteran
That is an F perm novriil. Do you like that alg for that? I don't really like mine...
Accomplishment Thread
- Thread starter edd5190
- Start date
Novriil
Veteran
Okay
Now I know the name.. The alg SUCKS! :S It's so damn bad.. At my opinion.. Wait I'll do it and say what I hate the most. The F U is bad I have to do U with 4. finger and that's slow. and the last U' is bad, cause U would be great but with U' I have to use some freaky finger // If anyone have got some suggestions or help then please help me. I want to do it faster, but it's so bad PLL to me right now
Last edited:
This was done last night:
Cubes Solved: 100/100
Average: 55.32
Standard Deviation: 10.71
Best Time: 35.96
Worst Time: 1:32.01
This was how my RA of 12 improved throughout the 100 solves: (the number at the end refers to the nth solve)
1:07.08 - 12
1:06.35 - 13
1:04.42 - 14
...
1:04.38 - 16
...
1:01.01 - 19
1:01.25 - 20
59.64 - 21
58.29 - 22
56.19 - 23
54.18 - 24
...
53.70 - 29
...
53.01 - 39
...
52.97 - 63
52.75 - 64
52.37 - 65
52.01 - 66
...
51.44 - 68
...
49.81 - 70
...
47.95 - 72 (best average of 12)
----------
This was done this morning:
Cubes Solved: 80/80
Average: 43.15
Standard Deviation: 6.04
Best Time: 30.58
Worst Time: 1:02.02 (my only sup-minute solve in this average)
And this was how my RA of 12 went:
44.34 - 12
44.26 - 13
43.21 - 14
...
42.19 - 20
41.09 - 21
...
40.37 - 64
...
39.98 - 66
39.89 - 67 (best average of 12)
I shaved about 30 seconds off my BA of 12 in a night. So, guess the puzzle!
P/S: I only had three lucky solves in all 180 solves, but they were all sup-40
All my sub-40 solves were full step, including the 30.58, which can only mean one thing - loads of room for improvement!
Cubes Solved: 100/100
Average: 55.32
Standard Deviation: 10.71
Best Time: 35.96
Worst Time: 1:32.01
This was how my RA of 12 improved throughout the 100 solves: (the number at the end refers to the nth solve)
1:07.08 - 12
1:06.35 - 13
1:04.42 - 14
...
1:04.38 - 16
...
1:01.01 - 19
1:01.25 - 20
59.64 - 21
58.29 - 22
56.19 - 23
54.18 - 24
...
53.70 - 29
...
53.01 - 39
...
52.97 - 63
52.75 - 64
52.37 - 65
52.01 - 66
...
51.44 - 68
...
49.81 - 70
...
47.95 - 72 (best average of 12)
----------
This was done this morning:
Cubes Solved: 80/80
Average: 43.15
Standard Deviation: 6.04
Best Time: 30.58
Worst Time: 1:02.02 (my only sup-minute solve in this average)
And this was how my RA of 12 went:
44.34 - 12
44.26 - 13
43.21 - 14
...
42.19 - 20
41.09 - 21
...
40.37 - 64
...
39.98 - 66
39.89 - 67 (best average of 12)
I shaved about 30 seconds off my BA of 12 in a night. So, guess the puzzle!
P/S: I only had three lucky solves in all 180 solves, but they were all sup-40
All my sub-40 solves were full step, including the 30.58, which can only mean one thing - loads of room for improvement!
Last edited:
qqwref
Legend
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Messages
- 7,834
- Location
- a <script> tag near you
- WCA ID
- 2006GOTT01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Okay
// If anyone have got some suggestions or help then please help me. I want to do it faster, but it's so bad PLL to me right now
(R' U R U' R2' x d') (R' U R) y' (R U R' U' R2)
Exactly how I do it. Only I combine the R'2 and the x rotation so it's something like R' Lw'. The R' U R flows nicely after the Dw' too, I use my pinky for the U in R' U R.
Neroflux
Veteran
I shaved about 30 seconds off my BA of 12 in a night. So, guess the puzzle!
5x5 OH BLD with toothpicks in your nostrils?
MTGjumper
Veteran
Square-1?
Anyway, whilst I'm on the topic, got this as my fourth scramble of the day: (0,3) / (-3,-3) / (3,3) / (0,3) / (5,0) / (4,4) / (-1,2) / (0,1) / (3,0) / (0,3) / (6,0) / (4,0) / (3,2) / (-3,3) / (3,3) / (-3,3) /
Got a full step 12.91. Sub-WR, baby
Faz
Former Clock NR Holder
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2008
- Messages
- 4,250
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- WCA ID
- 2009ZEMD01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
18.21 ^^^^
Close enough. Chopsticks actually.
Close enough too. Only it's much easier than square-1 because you only need to do the first step of square-1: Restore to cube shape
Mirror blocks a.k.a. bump cube Currently my new favorite puzzle because I just miraculously improved ridiculously without even trying 
rachmaninovian
Veteran
6:10.43 single 7x7 centres last sux for super big cubes ._. but still...xD
joey
Member
13:59:23 <+micro501> 3x3 Scramble #28201: L R2 B' L2 F' D L2 R2 U' B2 F D R L2 U2 F2 U L' D' F U2 R2 L2 B2 R2
8.69
8.69
MTGjumper
Veteran
Sub-WR again, 12.14: (0,6) / (6,3) / (0,3) / (0,3) / (0,3) / (-3,0) / (6,3) / (6,0) / (6,0) / (6,3) / (4,0) / (3,5) / (-3,3) / (3,3) / (-1,3) / (-5,4) /
fanwuq
Legend
Statistics for 06-03-2009 10:43:39
Average: 9.82
Standard Deviation: 2.89
Best Time: 5.66
Worst Time: 15.67
Individual Times:
1. 15.31 u' b' R B U L U' B L' R' U B L B U' R' L U' B' R' U' R U' B' U'
2. 6.14 u' U' B R L R U' B' U B' L' R L' U L R L' B' R' B U R B U' L'
3. 10.22 u' r' b U B' L U L' R L' U' L R B U' B' L R B' U L' B R U' B
4. 11.34 u' l b' L B' U B' U L B' U R' L' R' L B L B L' R B R' U' R' L'
5. 11.08 u' l r' R B' U L' U L' R' B U' L U L' U L' U L B' L' R U L R
6. 8.09 u L B' R U R' L' B U' L' B L' B U' R U B R L' U R U' R U L
7. 6.23 u' l r' b' L B R B U B U' L R U' L' R B R U' B' R' L' B' R B'
8. (5.66) l B' L' B' U' B R' U B' R' L' R B U' R U B' U' R L' U' L R U' B
9. (15.67) u' r' b L U' L' U R L U B R' L' B' L' U R' U R' B U L' U B L
10. 11.12 u' r b L' U' B' R' L' R' U R' L R B R' L B' L B' U' L' B U' R B'
11. 6.34 u' r U' B U' R U' R L' U B L' U' L R B L' U B' U' B R B U' B
12. 12.30 u' l' r' b B R U L' U L B' U R B' R' U' B' L' R' B L U L' R B
I'm back to Pyraminx solving after several months of break. I want my NR back (perhaps even make Chinese NR better than NAR). 5.66 was a non-lucky single PB. This was my first average after the break, not even a rolling average. Best average of 5 was 7.90. If it weren't for the 3 bad singles over 12 seconds, this would have been decent. I'm overall pleased that I have 4 sub-7 solves.
Average: 9.82
Standard Deviation: 2.89
Best Time: 5.66
Worst Time: 15.67
Individual Times:
1. 15.31 u' b' R B U L U' B L' R' U B L B U' R' L U' B' R' U' R U' B' U'
2. 6.14 u' U' B R L R U' B' U B' L' R L' U L R L' B' R' B U R B U' L'
3. 10.22 u' r' b U B' L U L' R L' U' L R B U' B' L R B' U L' B R U' B
4. 11.34 u' l b' L B' U B' U L B' U R' L' R' L B L B L' R B R' U' R' L'
5. 11.08 u' l r' R B' U L' U L' R' B U' L U L' U L' U L B' L' R U L R
6. 8.09 u L B' R U R' L' B U' L' B L' B U' R U B R L' U R U' R U L
7. 6.23 u' l r' b' L B R B U B U' L R U' L' R B R U' B' R' L' B' R B'
8. (5.66) l B' L' B' U' B R' U B' R' L' R B U' R U B' U' R L' U' L R U' B
9. (15.67) u' r' b L U' L' U R L U B R' L' B' L' U R' U R' B U L' U B L
10. 11.12 u' r b L' U' B' R' L' R' U R' L R B R' L B' L B' U' L' B U' R B'
11. 6.34 u' r U' B U' R U' R L' U B L' U' L R B L' U B' U' B R B U' B
12. 12.30 u' l' r' b B R U L' U L B' U R B' R' U' B' L' R' B L U L' R B
I'm back to Pyraminx solving after several months of break. I want my NR back (perhaps even make Chinese NR better than NAR). 5.66 was a non-lucky single PB. This was my first average after the break, not even a rolling average. Best average of 5 was 7.90. If it weren't for the 3 bad singles over 12 seconds, this would have been decent. I'm overall pleased that I have 4 sub-7 solves.
soccerking813
Veteran
F' U' L' B2 U' L2 U' F2 D' B' R L' F L2 U' D' F U2 R D L' F2 B' U2 R 18.79 non-lucky. My best non-lucky solve.
SimonWestlund
Veteran
just got 0.22 on Jeremy Fleishman's 2x2 simulator
2 move solution - R2 U2
2 move solution - R2 U2
soccerking813
Veteran
Figured out how to solve 5x5 centers last, with only a little help on solving the corner centers. Figured out the edge centers by myself.
Daniel Wu
Premium Member
Statistics for 06-03-2009 16:27:28
Cubes Solved: 40/42
Number of Pops: 3 Stupid type A
Average: 17.51
Standard Deviation: 1.71
Best Time: 14.05
Worst Time: 21.00 :rolleyes:
RA of 5: 15.95
I'm liking this sudden improvement to sub-18!
Cubes Solved: 40/42
Number of Pops: 3 Stupid type A
Average: 17.51
Standard Deviation: 1.71
Best Time: 14.05
Worst Time: 21.00 :rolleyes:
RA of 5: 15.95
I'm liking this sudden improvement to sub-18!
1:30.68 3x3x3 solving in <r,u,f>
I should practice 2x2x2 for Macau Open to improve my NR. Or AsR...
Pyraminx is too hard for me. At least I'm not the worst Chinese pyraminxer now.
I should practice 2x2x2 for Macau Open to improve my NR. Or AsR...
Pyraminx is too hard for me. At least I'm not the worst Chinese pyraminxer now.
qqwref
Legend
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Messages
- 7,834
- Location
- a <script> tag near you
- WCA ID
- 2006GOTT01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
I learned to use jfly's PyraminxSim.
7.05 6.75 5.68 5.55 5.61 5.21 (8.92) 5.17 5.23 8.81 5.98 (3.66) = 6.10
EDIT: So it's about 12 hours later. I was doing some hi-games 5x5 and I got a 59.31, sub-1 but still above my PB. Then I managed a 58.35 That 59.06 was there since January and now I beat it.
7.05 6.75 5.68 5.55 5.61 5.21 (8.92) 5.17 5.23 8.81 5.98 (3.66) = 6.10
EDIT: So it's about 12 hours later. I was doing some hi-games 5x5 and I got a 59.31, sub-1 but still above my PB. Then I managed a 58.35
That 59.06 was there since January and now I beat it.
Last edited:
fanwuq
Legend
I learned to use jfly's PyraminxSim.
7.05 6.75 5.68 5.55 5.61 5.21 (8.92) 5.17 5.23 8.81 5.98 (3.66) = 6.10
EDIT: So it's about 12 hours later. I was doing some hi-games 5x5 and I got a 59.31, sub-1 but still above my PB. Then I managed a 58.35
Well, you only get one try in your computer puzzle competition, so I still beat you this time.
How fast are you one the real thing? And are you color neutral on Jfly's sim? I can only do D layer first. Have you gotten it to rotate, or do you use B moves like me? How long have you practiced before you did that average? I did around 15 solves before I did my 10.8 average.
Very nice 5x5 solves! Will you get the UWR again?... I've yet to sub-2:25, but I think I'm getting close.
Edit: 4444th reply!
Last edited:
Similar threads
