• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Sub1Hour

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2018
Messages
1,873
Location
Utah
WCA
2018BECK05
YouTube
Visit Channel
New 4x4 PB! I was warming up for a big cube session and got a 35.29!

Generated By csTimer
single: 35.29

Time List:
1. 35.29 F2 R U2 D F B' R' F L U L2 B2 D' F2 U2 R2 U' B2 U B2 L2 Uw2 Fw2 D R2 Uw2 D B Uw2 U Rw2 F L B' U Rw' L U Uw' Rw U2 Rw L2 Fw L'
 
Z

Zubin Park

Guest
Don't have it on camera tho... was busy recording and was too lazy to have a camera set up
 
Z

Zubin Park

Guest
Yeah, I was sure that it was a last slot+last layer sub mod thing, but I checked, and it was the official wca scramble.
 
Z

Zubin Park

Guest
Yeah, I know. I knew people were gonna say it wasn’t full step when they tried the scramble lol
 
Z

Zubin Park

Guest
I mean, I’m not trying to arouse any suspicion, just a very interesting scramble that I capitalized on. I would never get sub 5, or sub 6 for that matter. I’m sub 9, with 10’s and 11’s
 

Nmile7300

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2019
Messages
1,030
Location
Arizona
WCA
2019MILE04
YouTube
Visit Channel
I mean, I’m not trying to arouse any suspicion, just a very interesting scramble that I capitalized on. I would never get sub 5, or sub 6 for that matter. I’m sub 9, with 10’s and 11’s
I think what @ProStar is saying is that the chances of that scramble happening are ridiculous which makes this solve seem suspicious. Now here are the things I find suspicious about this solve. Keep in mind that I am not trying to accuse you of cheating, I am just saying that it seems suspicious.

  • The chances of getting a scramble with F2L-1 solved: The chances of this happening are so slim, it makes the solve seem fake. I have never even gotten a cross skip throughout tens of thousands of solves.
  • The time you got: You would think that a sub 9 solver could get better than a 4.98 on a scramble that crazy. I don't know what this means, I'm just saying it is kind of weird.
  • The garbage LL cases: If you did the same solution as me then you got a terrible OLL and an N perm. If you were to set up the scramble, then it makes sense that you would give the scramble bad LL cases so the time seemed more legit. What I mean is that if the LL cases had been better, then you might have gotten a mid 3, which would have seemed suspicious even before we asked for the scramble.
  • Your reaction and calling it "fullstep": It seems kind of weird that your reaction was so chill. If I had gotten that kind of scramble I would have freaked out and posted about it on this thread, my progress thread, and the easy scramble thread. I would have been like "OH MY GOSH I GOT A SCRAMBLE WITH F2L-1 SOLVED WHAT THE HECK!!!!!!" You were just like "Yeah I got a sub 5 solve and it was fullstep" and didn't even give the scramble. Maybe you were hoping that by saying it was fullstep when it clearly wasn't, people would not ask for the scramble. I don't see any other reason that you would say the solve was full step when you knew it was not.

Please don't get mad at me. Again, I am not accusing you of faking solves. I just think the circumstances are a bit fishy. If you actually are faking, I suggest you admit it immediately, there is nothing to be gained by cheating.
 
Top