Owen Morrison
Member
That is an outdated resource that is extremely biased and it is a terrible resource for beginners.If you want more information about each method, check out the first link in my signature!
That is an outdated resource that is extremely biased and it is a terrible resource for beginners.If you want more information about each method, check out the first link in my signature!
That is an outdated resource that is extremely biased and it is a terrible resource for beginners.
Yes.Is that your unbiased opinion?
Then you have to use COLL which isnt good for sunes
It's part of a bigger idea, but it's not meant to be something you do all the time, just if you get a good case you theoretically could ig.Kian has a video on why CMLLEO is bad, and that would extend to influencing EO in the way that you suggest during SB.
Thats a perfectly good speed. =) Just keep practicing and it'll go down further.Heya, I've been using the Roux method for exactly a month, my ao100 on 3x3 is sub 55.25 so that's pretty accurate. Is my improvement slow? I have no idea
sune coll is good but okThen you have to use COLL which isnt good for sunes
Sune COLL is fine, it's just that the OCLL is so fast it's not worth it in ZZ and CFOP.Then you have to use COLL which isnt good for sunes
I average around 15-16 when I'm warmed up and i only have gotten 3 sub-15 ao5's but how to get consistent sub-15? My splits are around 3 5 3 4 and I use 2 look cmll. I could also post some of my solves to critique. Pls help
You should start learning full CMLL. I think that is the easiest and fastest way to improve at this point. I am averaging around the same as you with roux and my time splits are the same. If you want to we could race each other to full CMLL, I’d be up for that!I average around 15-16 when I'm warmed up and i only have gotten 3 sub-15 ao5's but how to get consistent sub-15? My splits are around 3 5 3 4 and I use 2 look cmll. I could also post some of my solves to critique. Pls help
sure man im downYou should start learning full CMLL. I think that is the easiest and fastest way to improve at this point. I am averaging around the same as you with roux and my time splits are the same. If you want to we could race each other to full CMLL, I’d be up for that!
Yes, you should track LR during CMLL. You can also work out where the "other" ULUR edge is by omission (so if you can't see it, it must be where you can't see). Incidentally, why do you think tracking would slow down the step? If it's because you think you need to slow down your turning to track, the real trick is learning how your CMLL affect the edges (which also means you can learn alt algs to force nicer cases).How are you supposed to recognize EOLR? If there's a LR edge in BD, I have to tilt the cube to see it. Should I track it during CMLL? I haven't tried tracking the LR pieces during CMLL yet, as I think CMLL should be a fast step. Also, is it still worth it to be doing FB edges as well as LR edges if I use EOLR? Recognition seems to be a fair bit worse if you use both.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | The "H" Method- A different Combination of Roux and CFOP | How-to's, Guides, etc. | 3 | |
CFOP vs ROUX | General Speedcubing Discussion | 12 | ||
[Member Intro] Yoooooooooooo I'm badatroux | Member Introductions | 8 | ||
G | I tried roux for 7 days | Puzzle Video Gallery | 0 | |
E | Roux CN discussion (x2/y vs full CN) | General Speedcubing Discussion | 22 |