So I saw your video with Meyer. And I'm really interested. What do you believe is the potential of this method compared to CFOP based ones? Also M slices are just a matter of practice right?
Meyer can definitely get you to low 30 averages, and maybe even farther. Another method to consider is Stadler. I did not think it could be as fast as yau and meyer, but Kaijun proved me wrong. M slices on a 4x4 are quite easy to be honest. The only thing you need to do is flick on the border between the 2 inner slices.
 
Meyer can definitely get you to low 30 averages, and maybe even farther. Another method to consider is Stadler. I did not think it could be as fast as yau and meyer, but Kaijun proved me wrong. M slices on a 4x4 are quite easy to be honest. The only thing you need to do is flick on the border between the 2 inner slices.

Interesting, thanks for the information. I might try it again and see if I can get used to it. Is there any reason you choose E slice pairing over M slice. About Stadler I did see Kaijun's video on it but never knew what method he was using. I might try a bit of Stadler
 
Interesting, thanks for the information. I might try it again and see if I can get used to it. Is there any reason you choose E slice pairing over M slice. About Stadler I did see Kaijun's video on it but never knew what method he was using. I might try a bit of Stadler
I've never tried M slice pairing, but I chose E slice because I wanted to replicate Yau as closely as I could. Originally, I just independently modified Yau to allow for me to use roux, but now I think E slice pairing has much better fingertricks.
 
Meyer can definitely get you to low 30 averages, and maybe even farther. Another method to consider is Stadler. I did not think it could be as fast as yau and meyer, but Kaijun proved me wrong. M slices on a 4x4 are quite easy to be honest. The only thing you need to do is flick on the border between the 2 inner slices.
what is the outliene of the meyer method?


also, I think that to be good at LSE, We need to work on some LSE hacks, like is a D edge is already solved and doing L5E, or doing ELL.
 
also, I think that to be good at LSE, We need to work on some LSE hacks, like is a D edge is already solved and doing L5E, or doing ELL.
You really don't need hax. All you need is the ability to influence and predict the UL/UR edges during CMLL/EO, misoriented centres and BU recog and you should be able to get <3 second LSE with only a little practise.
 
how does the LSE centers misoriented thing work, anyway?

I never actually learned it from anywhere and just sort of worked it out by myself so I have no real idea how to explain it clearly but basically, if you misorent all the edges except for UL/UR, and pit the centres off by an M/M', you can move the UL/UR around as if all the edges were oriented using U/M2s. Once UL/UR is solved, you can them put the remaining edges on the M-slice and do an M/M' to orient them.

It's particularly useful if you have UL/UR that will end up in UF and UD or UB and BD and are in the points of the arrow 4-flip case.
 
eh, i was more like 5-7-4-4
I seem to have been the opposite of you: 4-5-5-6 (my 2-look was terrible)

Weird that I'm now something like 2-3.5-2.5-3. But I have recently figured out a lot of LSE tricks-still need to learn BU and use in solves properly though :p- my CMLL should also be faster but exams so I can't be bothered to completely intergrate new algs to replace some of the more terrible ones I have and start working on sone prediction.
 
I seem to have been the opposite of you: 4-5-5-6 (my 2-look was terrible)

Weird that I'm now something like 2-3.5-2.5-3. But I have recently figured out a lot of LSE tricks-still need to learn BU and use in solves properly though :p- my CMLL should also be faster but exams so I can't be bothered to completely intergrate new algs to replace some of the more terrible ones I have and start working on sone prediction.
For algs, just sit down for a week and replace all of the bad ones. I find it's harder to replace them little by little, and it's beneficial to change a whole bunch at once and then just drill them for a while. Prediction isn't important until you average sub-9, and to learn it you basically have to get good at 2x2.
 
Does anyone have any good resources on influencing ULUR in 2 flip cases, or is it best just to try a bunch of stuff and figure it out?
Just try working stuff out though misoriented centres is useful and doing U/U' M/M' are almost interchangable is quite a few scenarios so that can help.

Anyway, my question: who are the top 25 (or at least as many as you can) roux solvers by official single and average?
 
Back
Top