• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Random Cubing Discussion

I think he was being facetious!
I have an 'impossible' and I must say what a terrible excuse for a cube it is! The idea is fun, but the physical cube is abysmal. In 2022 when you can get great speed cubes for $5, I dont think Rubiks can hold their heads high over this cube. It's worse than the 'regular' cube they make, by far.
Anyway, rant over. Merry Christmas everyone..
You missed something. The Rubik's impossible isn't supposed to be a speed cube at all. It's a novelty puzzle and turns quite well for a Rubik's brand puzzle in my opinion. If you want a $5 speedcube go ahead and get one. That's not what the Impossible is. Rubik's largely tailors to puzzle solvers, not speedcubers.
 
I know it's not supposed to be a speed cube. My point was that in 2022 there is no excuse to make such a terrible cube. As I stated, I have one and it's way worse than the regular Rubik's 3x3 imo. I wouldn't expect it to be like a speed cube, it was a comparative statement that even the cheapest cubes are pretty good. The 'Impossible' is absolutely atrocious!! It's not like they're new to cube manufacturing is it?
Anyway, as also stated, I was just having a bit of a rant
 
I know it's not supposed to be a speed cube. My point was that in 2022 there is no excuse to make such a terrible cube. As I stated, I have one and it's way worse than the regular Rubik's 3x3 imo. I wouldn't expect it to be like a speed cube, it was a comparative statement that even the cheapest cubes are pretty good. The 'Impossible' is absolutely atrocious!! It's not like they're new to cube manufacturing is it?
Anyway, as also stated, I was just having a bit of a rant
Remember that even cubes turning bad by todays standard need really high tolerances for their plastic injection moulding.
Team blind should be an event. Who agrees?
No. Makes you have cubing friends in order to compete in every event. Also, it will be very, possibly too noisy in comps
 
Team blind should be an event. Who agrees?
Team blind certainly is fun. How would they rank it though? Would the world record go to 2 people, and could someone on the world record team also be a member of the WR2 team? Is there a distinction between the solver and the speaker or would they change positions throughout the average? Definitely would be cool to be an event although there's a lot that needs to be thought about and changed in the ranking system so it probably shouldn't be an event.
 
Just wondering if gear cuboid is possible…
3x3x5 might be possible in the sense that different tooth gears mesh if they have the same module.
But you face the problem that the mechanism needs to fit inside the 3x3x3 space which makes the outer pieces very hard hard to find a way to get them moving. Then you need to remember that the long faces can only be turned with a 4 move.
I'd givt the idea to manufacturers but this is a rather amitious idea.
 
I know it's not supposed to be a speed cube. My point was that in 2022 there is no excuse to make such a terrible cube. As I stated, I have one and it's way worse than the regular Rubik's 3x3 imo. I wouldn't expect it to be like a speed cube, it was a comparative statement that even the cheapest cubes are pretty good. The 'Impossible' is absolutely atrocious!! It's not like they're new to cube manufacturing is it?
There actually is an excuse. On a puzzle like this, you absolutely do not want to have pops or corner twists happening, making a difficult-to-solve puzzle into one that really is literally impossible to solve. The turning may be sub-par, but it's good enough.

Now, whether the designer/manufacturer thought of this angle when they made the puzzle, we have no way of knowing.
 
image.jpg


Have anyone seen a transparent moyu cube stand before?
 
There actually is an excuse. On a puzzle like this, you absolutely do not want to have pops or corner twists happening, making a difficult-to-solve puzzle into one that really is literally impossible to solve. The turning may be sub-par, but it's good enough.

Now, whether the designer/manufacturer thought of this angle when they made the puzzle, we have no way of knowing.
That's a good point, one I hadn't considered. But I still dont think it needs to be quite so appalling! It's way worse than the regular Rubik's, which doesn't come close to corner twisting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hyn
I had an idea for a puzzle. A 3x3 with sliding tiles. It would be hard to make because the tiles would fall out half way through turns, but it would be pretty cool. You could have one with colors and maybe even an 8 puzzle one. That would be fun to solve. I’m not good at editing so I don’t have a pic though
 
I had an idea for a puzzle. A 3x3 with sliding tiles. It would be hard to make because the tiles would fall out half way through turns, but it would be pretty cool. You could have one with colors and maybe even an 8 puzzle one. That would be fun to solve. I’m not good at editing so I don’t have a pic though
Tiles will need magnets to be held in place.
 
I had an idea for a puzzle. A 3x3 with sliding tiles. It would be hard to make because the tiles would fall out half way through turns, but it would be pretty cool. You could have one with colors and maybe even an 8 puzzle one. That would be fun to solve. I’m not good at editing so I don’t have a pic though
They make something similar to this now. It's called a Rubik's Slide.

Amazon.com: Rubik's Slide, New Advanced 3x3 Cube Classic Color-Matching  Problem-Solving Brain Teaser Puzzle Retro Game Fidget Toy, for Adults &  Kids Ages 8 and up : Everything Else
 
Back
Top