• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Random Cubing Discussion

If you are doing COLL, then it is not lucky.

Getting U perms in a row has more odds.
Indeed, as each U Perm has like a 1 in 4 chance.
But usually it's just getting U Perms.
Both the same PreAUF and PostAUF is still quite more lucky.

I also think that I get the same PLL in a row quite more often than mathematics would tell.
Statistics for things that have 0.00006%, like in a post above, may not make sense, even if your sample size is in the 5 Digits. If you do 100 Million solves, the curve should flatten out to what the statistic says.
You also have to remember, ignoring angle-independent PLLs like H Perm, if you get 1 Ua Perm, it's no different if you next get 4 F Perms or F, Ub, Ja, A. Both have the same chance, you just find one of them more lucky than the other.
 
Random thought: I realised what kept me away from improving my F2L the most is the sheer organisation of F2L cases. It confuses me that cases are not just mirrored, but it's mirror + rotation because FR slot is always the assumed target slot. Then again pieces in wrong slot (like on speedcubedb) confuses me more. Also the mirror + rotation algorithm is not always included in the mirror + rotation case. So one has to find the case pairs (which is easy on LS but not that easy in wrong slot cases) and mirror it.

Also different U positions make a whole other difference, which is not made explicit in most resources. One has to dig thorugh the alg alternatives.
 
I've got an idea
3x3 / tetris relay
you have 15sec inspection, solve 3x3, then do tetris 40L and subtract 3 seconds from the total (the 3 seconds you have to wait for the tetris session to start)
what do you guys think?
for me sub2:15 would be super fast
 
I found a good drill to practice tps spam and getting muscle memory on alg inverses

if you want to learn two cases that are inverses of each other, do:

1. alg (setup to inverse)
2. inverse (solve the setup)
3. inverse (setup to alg)
4. alg (solve the setup)

repeat from number 1

that helps with alg recogniton and muscle memory. (I'm doing to drill COLL inverses)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Me: the UK isn’t good at cubing, but we do have 1 world record.
Dad: what event is it?
Me: clock average
Dad: Ohhhhh…..
Me: yeahh…
Dad: it’s not even a 3 dimensional puzzle (smh)
 
Me: the UK isn’t good at cubing, but we do have 1 world record.
Dad: what event is it?
Me: clock average
Dad: Ohhhhh…..
Me: yeahh…
Dad: it’s not even a 3 dimensional puzzle (smh)
dang I have to get a clonk but it's a little expesive with the taxes
EDIT: and I got a good magnetic skewb and barely touched it since I got it
 
I found a good drill to practice tps spam and getting muscle memory on alg inverses

if you want to learn two cases that are inverses of each other, do:

1. alg (setup to inverse)
2. inverse (solve the setup)
3. inverse (setup to alg)
4. alg (solve the setup)

repeat from number 1

that helps with alg recogniton and muscle memory. (I'm doing to drill COLL inverses)

That reminds me that I made a cool Excel List with all the OLL Cases and their relations to each other.
Sometimes (like Sune and Antisune) you see it directly because the Algs are reversed, but sometimes you don't learn the reverse Alg because of Fingertricks, Lefty... In these cases it's good to know.
That helped me a lot to learn Full OLL. I've always learned a couple of OLL together as pairs of inverse Algs.

Unfortunately I lost it at a recent HD Crash :-(
This was not in the Backup yet.
Maybe I do it again.
 
Last edited:
you know what's so crazy to me, all cubers who take a break can come back after a few months and just be as good if not better when they stopped. I recently took a long break from cubing and branched off into other things utilizing my finger dexterity. but I can still average about 13 seconds after a warm up.
 
you know what's so crazy to me, all cubers who take a break can come back after a few months and just be as good if not better when they stopped. I recently took a long break from cubing and branched off into other things utilizing my finger dexterity. but I can still average about 13 seconds after a warm up.
I dropped 15 seconds in a few months
 
Back
Top