A Collection of Algorithms

[Kirjava]

is that just sune + Hperm? 2GLL?

Why are you asking stuff that you already know?

 

[riffz]

Why are you asking stuff that you already know?

This takes me back to the high school experience.

 

[Kirjava]

Dan wanted a better edge pairing alg

Rw2 B2 x Rw U2 Rw' D2 Rw U2 Rw

 

[Ville Seppänen]

R' F R2 U' R2 F2 R2 U' R2 F R
Statue wouldn't post this himself.

 

[AJ Blair]

U R U2 R' L' U' L U' R U' R' L' U2 L

Got tired of doing R D R' D' over and over again in BLD and in regular solves

 

[Robert-Y]

Nice OLLCP alg which Joey found:

R2 D L' B L D' R2' U' F' U' F

It swaps opposite corners and flips adjacent edges.

My best is 1.1x so far.

 

[oll+phase+sync]

R2 D L' B' L D' R2' F' U F

Looks similar and is a nice CLL

 

[bobthegiraffemonkey]

Can't seem to find this OLL anywhere, but I'm surprised it hasn't been found before (inverse could also be useful):
F R' F' R U2 R' U' R2 U' R2' U2' R

 

[Egide]

Some algs l found for the 2x2x2

XLL R2 U' R' U L' U2 R U' R' U2

EG-1 U' F' R U2 R' F2 U2 F

EG-2 F U' R U2 R U' R' U R' F'

 

[StachuK1992]

Some algs l found for the 2x2x2

XLL R2 U' R' U L' U2 R U' R' U2

Thanks for the pure T L2L alg
Actually, that alg works for 2 cases. I should go look through a bunch of 2x2 algs.

 

[b4p]

after trying a few of these algorithms, i think that they are much faster than those on fridrich's website (the ones I originally learned with). The algorithms here are written in a way that makes them faster to execute, which is nice. My question is, of these algorithms, are they generally listed in order of best to worse, or more popular to less popular?

The description in the wiki tells us to try all of them to see which one is faster to us, which is great advice, but I was just wondering about the ordering because this BLD guide i watched just happened to use two algorithms that just happened to be at the tops of their lists.

 

[timeless]

after trying a few of these algorithms, i think that they are much faster than those on fridrich's website (the ones I originally learned with). The algorithms here are written in a way that makes them faster to execute, which is nice. My question is, of these algorithms, are they generally listed in order of best to worse, or more popular to less popular?

The description in the wiki tells us to try all of them to see which one is faster to us, which is great advice, but I was just wondering about the ordering because this BLD guide i watched just happened to use two algorithms that just happened to be at the tops of their lists.

i think theyre listed from common to non-common algs

 

[b4p]

Thanks.

In my opinion the Printable versions of these pages look awful with the full links being displayed. The only way I could get these pages to print nicely is to import the original page into microsoft word and do some editing. It might be helpful to others if the printable versions were given a second look. I don't mean to offend anyone
here are examples:
http://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=PLL&printable=yes&useskin=vector
http://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=OLL&printable=yes&useskin=vector

 

[CRO]

I'd appreciate it if someone could give me nice G and N perms

 

[Erzz]

I'd appreciate it if someone could give me nice G and N perms

8:49 to end
He has done them each in under one second.

 

[Robert-Y]

x' R U R' D R U2 R U R2' D' x

Some alg for some awkward OLL case. My best is about 0.9x

The mirror alg is better:

x R' U' R D' R' U2 R' U' R2 D x' My best is about 0.8x with this

The inverses are good too

 

[Hyprul 9-ty2]

x' R U R' D R U2 R U R2' D' x

Some alg for some awkward OLL case. My best is about 0.9x

The mirror alg is better:

x R' U' R D' R' U2 R' U' R2 D x' My best is about 0.8x with this

The inverses are good too

The mirror alg is beautiful. How do you come up with stuff like this

 

[Robert-Y]

Well I use CE5. Ever since I found out about Rowe's E perm, and the fact that Morten can do an E perm in 0.72, I've been trying to find more algs which are <RUD> and can be done without regrips

 

[amostay2004]

zomg nice OLLCP

 

[bobthegiraffemonkey]

Na perm (already known): R U' R' U R B U B' R' U' R B' R B R' U R'
probably much better variation: R U' R' U R f R f' R' U' R U R' U F' U' F

I'll probably switch from what I was using.

Edit: Fun RUD one (for the hell of it, not really practical IMO), I can do it without regrips: R2' U D R2 D' R2' U' R2 D R2' D' U2' R2 U R2' U' R2