daniel0731ex
Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,294
Here's my personal slant of this "argument":
#18
Reading ElectricDoodle's post, I was glad that somebody agrees with me about Lubix being a ripoff; then he claims the differential oil being "the same stuff as Lubix", which, although I never questioned the effect other cubers have experienced, have always wondered if it's truely the same. I thought I might as well ask him if he knew a bit more about the composition, so I told him my doubts to see if he could clear that up for me.
#19
ElectricDoodle's reply caught me by suprise, it was quite different from what I expected. I was thinking that he might talk about the ingredient list on the packaging of his diff oil, or exchange some information that I didn't know; but he skipped the key point and begins talking about his own hands-on experience (which I never questioned) and how I should try both of them myself. To me it seems that he thought I was doubting him, when I just simply wanted to add a few more things to this friendly discussion. He also preached about the advantages of diff oil over Lubix, which was unnecessary because I'm not a Lubix fanboy.
This is the reason why I thought that post was defensive, because he dodged my questoin and defends using the argument that "how it feels is all it matters". Though his tone was indeed calm, so this may merely be an over-interpretation on my side.
#20
I figure that this was nothing but a misunderstanding, so I hinted ElectricNoodle to look at my post that was right above him (that didn't go so well).
#21
-ElectricDoodie does become defensive (which is logical)
-ElectricDoodie calls daniel0731ex a kid (didn't check if he is, but he shouldn't have done that)
-ElectricDoodle thinks I'm defensive
-ElectricDoodle takes the lead into the argument
#22
Saddened that he didn't pick up my hint trying establish a friendly alliance but instead brew hostility, I simply ignores his offence (because it doesn't matter once he realizes that it's only a misunderstanding) and explains my intention (that was in the previous post) to reveal my stance being the same as his, in hopes that he would realize our friendly status and get back on topic.
#24
He fails to see my friendly intention, and begins the argument.
For the sake of peace, I won't try to defend myself, so I ignores most of the parts directed personally.
#35
I expressed my wish once again that I would prefer not to continue this argument that was merely caused by a misunderstanding (by this time I figured that it's pointless to explain anymore). I repeated my original question, once again reminding that I am not questioning the effect but rather an innocent doubt on the composition.
#37
-ElectricDoodie (rightfully) points out that daniel0731ex is a hypocrite
-ElectricDoodie looses his calm and gets pulled into the argument
Ignored. I figure it's pointless to even talk about the original subject anymore. Whatever insult he directed at me, so be it.
#48
-daniel0731ex doesn't walk away from the fight and adds a few insults (ignorance)
Seeing that it's pointless to even discuss the original subject with him, I stated that I will not respond to this argument anymore, unless it's relavent to the topic. As for the "insults", I suppose it's very "unrightful" for me to express my frustration to his persistence (on the irrevalent argument that I constantly trys to avoid), after him "rightfully" calling me a hypocrite, eh?
I walked away from the fight from right here.
#49
Ignored the offence completely, just like what I have been doing from the beginning.
Though he said "You're not getting that point that I continually make", which I find funny because it's him who missed MY point in the first place and responded with something irrvalent.
#51
Responds to relavent points.
Repeating, for the 100th time, that I AM NOT DOUBTING THE EFFECT. I just wanted to introduce this aspect into the discussion, though Noodle somehow thought that I am rebutting his "point" with it.
I always agrees on "people should try both lubes for themselves", just didn't respond to it because it was irrevalent to my original question. But I guess he cared a lot about that, so kept on bringing it back while I wanted to stay on the original point.
You know, Arnaud, your analysis wasn't really fair; in many parts you clearly showed your bias by, for example, justifying ElectricNoodle's insult as being a "rightful" reaction, while in my case it would be "refusing to walk away from the the argument". Huh, didn't know that nowadays even insults can be "rightful" eh?.
So you complimented Noodle for "keeping his calm", then what about me avoiding the fight all along?
Would you like some coffee?
#18
Reading ElectricDoodle's post, I was glad that somebody agrees with me about Lubix being a ripoff; then he claims the differential oil being "the same stuff as Lubix", which, although I never questioned the effect other cubers have experienced, have always wondered if it's truely the same. I thought I might as well ask him if he knew a bit more about the composition, so I told him my doubts to see if he could clear that up for me.
#19
ElectricDoodle's reply caught me by suprise, it was quite different from what I expected. I was thinking that he might talk about the ingredient list on the packaging of his diff oil, or exchange some information that I didn't know; but he skipped the key point and begins talking about his own hands-on experience (which I never questioned) and how I should try both of them myself. To me it seems that he thought I was doubting him, when I just simply wanted to add a few more things to this friendly discussion. He also preached about the advantages of diff oil over Lubix, which was unnecessary because I'm not a Lubix fanboy.
This is the reason why I thought that post was defensive, because he dodged my questoin and defends using the argument that "how it feels is all it matters". Though his tone was indeed calm, so this may merely be an over-interpretation on my side.
#20
I figure that this was nothing but a misunderstanding, so I hinted ElectricNoodle to look at my post that was right above him (that didn't go so well).
#21
-ElectricDoodie does become defensive (which is logical)
-ElectricDoodie calls daniel0731ex a kid (didn't check if he is, but he shouldn't have done that)
-ElectricDoodle thinks I'm defensive
-ElectricDoodle takes the lead into the argument
#22
Saddened that he didn't pick up my hint trying establish a friendly alliance but instead brew hostility, I simply ignores his offence (because it doesn't matter once he realizes that it's only a misunderstanding) and explains my intention (that was in the previous post) to reveal my stance being the same as his, in hopes that he would realize our friendly status and get back on topic.
#24
He fails to see my friendly intention, and begins the argument.
For the sake of peace, I won't try to defend myself, so I ignores most of the parts directed personally.
#35
I expressed my wish once again that I would prefer not to continue this argument that was merely caused by a misunderstanding (by this time I figured that it's pointless to explain anymore). I repeated my original question, once again reminding that I am not questioning the effect but rather an innocent doubt on the composition.
#37
-ElectricDoodie (rightfully) points out that daniel0731ex is a hypocrite
-ElectricDoodie looses his calm and gets pulled into the argument
Ignored. I figure it's pointless to even talk about the original subject anymore. Whatever insult he directed at me, so be it.
#48
-daniel0731ex doesn't walk away from the fight and adds a few insults (ignorance)
Seeing that it's pointless to even discuss the original subject with him, I stated that I will not respond to this argument anymore, unless it's relavent to the topic. As for the "insults", I suppose it's very "unrightful" for me to express my frustration to his persistence (on the irrevalent argument that I constantly trys to avoid), after him "rightfully" calling me a hypocrite, eh?
I walked away from the fight from right here.
#49
Ignored the offence completely, just like what I have been doing from the beginning.
Though he said "You're not getting that point that I continually make", which I find funny because it's him who missed MY point in the first place and responded with something irrvalent.
#51
Responds to relavent points.
Repeating, for the 100th time, that I AM NOT DOUBTING THE EFFECT. I just wanted to introduce this aspect into the discussion, though Noodle somehow thought that I am rebutting his "point" with it.
I always agrees on "people should try both lubes for themselves", just didn't respond to it because it was irrevalent to my original question. But I guess he cared a lot about that, so kept on bringing it back while I wanted to stay on the original point.
You know, Arnaud, your analysis wasn't really fair; in many parts you clearly showed your bias by, for example, justifying ElectricNoodle's insult as being a "rightful" reaction, while in my case it would be "refusing to walk away from the the argument". Huh, didn't know that nowadays even insults can be "rightful" eh?.
So you complimented Noodle for "keeping his calm", then what about me avoiding the fight all along?
Would you like some coffee?
Last edited: