PenguinsDontFly
Legend
check out my signatureAny good resources for cll, cmll, cmsll, or coll?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
check out my signatureAny good resources for cll, cmll, cmsll, or coll?
Algdb is pretty good and there are other good ones in the more prominent roux solver's sigs (such as PDF and TDM (unless they have changed recently))Any good resources for cll, cmll, cmsll, or coll?
I posted a list of CMLL lists on post 42 of this thread (on page 3). Take a look at at least 2 or 3 algs for each case to try to find one that you like.Any good resources for cll, cmll, cmsll, or coll?
I don't think this is a good idea. You'll need to spend so much time practising Roux to get it to the same speed as your ZZ - that time would be better spent practising EOLine so you don't mind those bad cases.My goal is to be able to use it when my EOLine sucks.
You'll need to spend so much time practising Roux to get it to the same speed as your ZZ - that time would be better spent practising EOLine so you don't mind those bad cases.
Anything specifically? Have you asked on the ZZ thread? Be sure to take a look at EOLine solutions on JARCS (cube explorer can solve just EO if you only want to focus on that for now). Looking at example solves or reconstructions can also be useful.I try to improve EO, but there are just some things that don't get better.
Roux also uses a lot of inspection, especially if there are no pairs (which there aren't in most scrambles). But if you like Roux then of course you can practise it more if you want - liking a method is the best reason to solve with it! I definitely won't discourage you if you enjoy it. Just be aware that you won't be as fast if you want to become method neutral.Also, It's for things like relay, or how many cubes can you solve in ten minutes or FMC with STM. Things that dont allow inspection time (I've tried cfop, I don't want it to be main). I also just really like roux.
That's fine. Stickers aren't expensive but there are always times with bad light that you can't avoid, no matter what your stickers are like. Although recognising NMCLL would be hard in that lightSometimes I can't avoid bad lighting if my family is driving home at night or something. I haven't decided if I want to spend money on restickering my cubes because the MoYu sticker contrast is fine.
There are two links at the bottom of this page which may be of some use. Unfortunately I can't find anything more than that - hopefully someone else knows something more helpful!I thank you for your input. If you find any websites that show how to recognize NMCLL, can you tell me? I wouldn't know where to look.
Anything specifically? Have you asked on the ZZ thread? Be sure to take a look at EOLine solutions on JARCS (cube explorer can solve just EO if you only want to focus on that for now). Looking at example solves or reconstructions can also be useful.
I'm sure it can get better, you just need a bit more practice!
That's fair. And yes, planning a 1x2x2 while tracking the pair is quite easy in comparison to planning EOLine. Good luck with practising Roux!It's not that I'm bad at EO, it's just when I did ZZ solves at my last competition, there were (i think) three times when I couldn't find all my eo and plan it out in under fifteen seconds. Cfop had been my main method, so I just switched to cfop for those three solves and did fine (averaged 22 2H, made it to the second round OH). I personally don't like cfop, and ZZ is so ridiculously dependent on inspection time its quite burdening, which is why I want to get decent with roux. While I know that all methods require some inspection time, there are some that require less. While playing around with roux at home, I know that first block can be hard, but it almost certainly requires less inspection and planing that EOLine, and probably a little more than cross. Also, as a beginner I can just plan out a 1x2x2, and look for the other pair while building it.
I'm sure you understand my reasoning and I probably didn't need to type all this out, but on the off chance you didn't understand, I just wanted to make myself clear.
Use unlimited inspection time to begin with and over time you will get better and better and eventually naturally get faster without having to try to keep within inspection time.Continuing my total noob adventures, I'm having a lot of trouble with inspection and planning even just 1x2x2. Often there's a corner-edge pair and then I can usually plan within 15 seconds. But in the rest of the cases it takes me around a minute just to plan it.
Part of the time is just to find the potential pieces (after first scanning for CE pairs), usually using center-edge pairs if no CE available. The rest of the time is imagining the moves to bring them together.
Is there a better way to train this other than just practicing over and over again? I'm trying the block trainer site too, but don't see much effect.
Also, is there a method for doing inspection efficiently? I find myself looking at all the sides several times, trying to find different options.
I have to say, the simplicity of CFOP inspection is really appealing right now![]()
i recently switched from cfop to roux and am averaging ~33 seconds with 2 look cmll. i find my biggest weakness is looking ahead when building the first and second block. what can i do to improve?
See PDF's excellent "why you're not sub-X with Roux" videos on YouTubeAnybody know what the average split are for roux? I want to compare it to see what I need to improve on.