• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

The method debate thread

there must be other people who are good at oh roux right? :(
It isn't all that popular, with the overwhelming use of CFOP it is amazing that roux had the OH WR even once, which I think shows that Roux OH is better. Luri Grangerio and Tudor Lin have the 4th and 6th best OH averages with Roux though
 
2x2: Ortega, but cll when bottom layer is fully solved.

Assuming you don't know EG (which is best), Ortega shouldn't be used often if you know CLL. You can force cases where bottom layer is solved so that you can use CLL, which is better than doing Ortega

Sq-1: Screw

Screw is bad. Vandenbergh and Lin are objectively better

Megaminx: Star, F2l, S2l, 2-look Oll, 2-look Pll.

That's called Westlund
 
Here's my opinion:
2x2: Ortega, but cll when bottom layer is fully solved.
3x3: Cfop, but roux when necessary.
4x4: Yau
5x5: Redux.
Sq-1: Screw
Pyraminx: KeyHole
Megaminx: Star, F2l, S2l, 2-look Oll, 2-look Pll.
EG for 2x2 is objectively the best
5x5, yau or redux are the best
1-flip for pyraminx is the best imo
 
2x2: Ortega, but cll when bottom layer is fully solved.
Just no. EG+CLL is miles ahead of Ortega.
3x3: Cfop, but roux when necessary.
I'm not going to get into this debate, but I use CFOP. And are you saying that you should be method neutral with CFOP and Roux? If so, that's not true at all.
Yes
5x5: Redux.
I think Yau is better, but a lot of people will disagree.
Sq-1: Screw
Just no again. Vandenbergh is way better, and Lin is about the same, although I would say it's slightly worse.
Pyraminx: KeyHole
I'm not even sure what this is on pyraminx, but no again. L4E or Top First are way better.
Megaminx: Star, F2l, S2l, 2-look Oll, 2-look Pll.
Obviously Westlund with 2LLL is optimal, but a lot of people aren't going to go through the work of learning 1-look PLL and 1-look OLL for megaminx.
 
I think top-first methods (keyhole, oka, 1-flip, etc) are equal to L4E. But L4E is more straightforward imo
 
3x3: Cfop, but roux when necessary.
When I first got into speedcubing and was learning CFOP, I stumbled across Roux. A few days ago, I learned LSE. That's why I say to be method neutral. You may not agree.

Although, now to think of it, I'd rather stick to one method of the other. Roux or CFOP? CMLL or OLL and PLL?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Although, now to think of it, I'd rather stick to one method of the other. Roux or CFOP? CMLL or OLL and PLL?
It depends on you and how you like to solve. Do you like intuitive solving and making your solves as efficient as possible? Or do you like more straightforward solving and spamming TPS?
 
Back
Top