Matt11111
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2014
- Messages
- 1,370
- Location
- Probably my room
- WCA ID
- 2014PINN02
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Scuse me while I draft a forum awards thread.
StachuK1992
statue
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 3,812
- Location
- West Chester, PA
- WCA ID
- 2008KORI02
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
CLL Smooth
Veteran
We spend hours working on seconds.
No one understands this but us.
No one understands this but us.
CLL Smooth
Veteran
When there's no OH
Why am I still practicing
It for my next comp
Why am I still practicing
It for my next comp
FastCubeMaster
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2015
- Messages
- 1,318
- Location
- Brisbane, Australia
- WCA ID
- 2015PEAR02
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
I showed one of my friends the video from cubeorithms 'why cubing is so addictive,' and he replied with:
"Yeah but that doesn't explain why you have 12 of the same kind."
I have 6 3x3's (facepalm)
"Yeah but that doesn't explain why you have 12 of the same kind."
I have 6 3x3's (facepalm)
guysensei1
Legend
I just noticed that the Malaysian NR 3x3 single is Erik
joshsailscga
Veteran
Who is Ellis Landers? (OH ao12 UWR on wiki) He is not in WCA database.
guysensei1
Legend
Been messing around with 6x6 L2E and I'm wondering if using L2E algs (the 'parity' ones that is) is even worth it on 6x6. Let's talk about the wing 2-swap alg, L' U2 L' U2 F2 L' F2 R U2 R' U2 L2 (bad notation, if you do big cubes you should know this). Is it worth it to use this alg (and other parity L2E algs) and risk getting another OLL parity, or is it faster to just setup that case to a single 'paritied' edge and leave that for LL?
gateway cuber
Veteran
I use L2E but don't listen to me my 6x6 solves aren't even time able...
Hssandwich
Veteran
I mean not great at 6x6, but at I'd assume that it's faster to not do the alg, since it's effectively doing 2 algs in the solve (L2E and OLL parity) rather than just the one. If you have parity, that is.
guysensei1
Legend
Yeah but if you don't have parity it's much faster to do the L2E. So it's kind of like weighing which set of algs is faster.
Torch
Veteran
guysensei1
Legend
Ooh neat, that means that Nats will (most likely) be the largest comp with no new participants.
gateway cuber
Veteran
Just so everybody can know what happened this weekend...
WR 3x3 single: 4.74 Mats Valk
WR 5x5 single: 41.27 Feliks Zemdegs
WR 3x3 BLD single: 18.50 Kaijun Lin
WR 3x3 BLD Mean: 24.38 ^
WR 4BLD single: 2:02.49 ^
WR 5BLD single: 4:46.74 ^
WR 6x6 Mean: 1:37.85 Feliks Zemdegs
meanwhile I broke my humble PB single with a 6.68 (Feliks averages that at home!)
insanity....
WR 3x3 single: 4.74 Mats Valk
WR 5x5 single: 41.27 Feliks Zemdegs
WR 3x3 BLD single: 18.50 Kaijun Lin
WR 3x3 BLD Mean: 24.38 ^
WR 4BLD single: 2:02.49 ^
WR 5BLD single: 4:46.74 ^
WR 6x6 Mean: 1:37.85 Feliks Zemdegs
meanwhile I broke my humble PB single with a 6.68 (Feliks averages that at home!)
insanity....
joshsailscga
Veteran
Somebody needs to set Juan Pablo up with a kilominx
Torch
Veteran
oliviervlcube
Veteran
quality :s
D
Daniel Lin
Guest
on cube explorer, how do you allow M moves but not E or S moves?
there's only an option for slice moves
there's only an option for slice moves
TDM
Legend
I don't think that's an option.
D
Daniel Lin
Guest
why tho
M moves can make algs so much better
but then 99% of the algs I'm getting have E or S
Similar threads
