ch_ts

Member
I learned how to do 3C and 3E comms. I've been practicing them but sometimes I'll get stuck. How would I solve this with a comm?
The other solution is [B' R2 B, L']

Exotic Butters

Member
I want to find the best method for solving LL edge orientation by the time F2L is done. Is there a way to do EO during last two pairs?
thanks

WarriorCatCuber

Member
The best way is to learn ZBLS, which also isn't too hard to do intuitively (though algorithmic is better)

Sub1Hour

Member
using petrus is a sin
CFOP and Petrus have more in common than any other method (Excluding subsets and minor variations). It's more intuitive and has a lower move count and you do EO before OLL

BenChristman1

Member
The best way is to learn ZBLS, which also isn't too hard to do intuitively (though algorithmic is better)
Can you link the ZBLS algs?

WarriorCatCuber

Member
Can you link the ZBLS algs?

Filipe Teixeira

Member

also look up for VHLS, a ZBLS subeset

Last edited:

Filipe Teixeira

Member
Most of the algs stink(a few are good/okay) and are slow, so the extra recognition isn't worth it
if you're using it as a stepping stone for ZBLS I don't see the problem,
you have to start somewhere

is the same of saying that coll sucks to someone learning ZBLL

xyzzy

Member
VHLS sucks
More like:
(i) VHLS with bad algs sucks.
(ii) Using VHLS as a substitute for full OLL sucks.

These are both true and indisputable, and are what people usually mean when they say VHLS isn't good. What is not true (or at least, not obviously true) is that VHLS with "good" algs still sucks. I don't think I've ever seen the people who've learnt full ZBLS mentioning that you should just skip learning random chunks of it.

Exotic Butters

Member
@PetrusQuber Hopefully one day you can achieve sub 8 in comp and create a petrus revolution. I'd love to be proven wrong

PetrusQuber

Member
@PetrusQuber Hopefully one day you can achieve sub 8 in comp and create a petrus revolution. I'd love to be proven wrong
You’d love for it to be proven wrong?