Easy / Lucky / Hard / Weird scrambles Thread

[fun at the joy]

I'm not arguing that htm make no sense for FMC, just making a note.

nobody argued about using htm for fmc so Idk why you mention that

htm makes no sense for 3x3 speed solves because slices exist
so it is completely useless to say that the f2l is 20 moves if you follow wca regs (also everybody knows that it is 20 htm)

I totally agree that slice moves should count as 1 move.

ok then why you did you post


I think you didn't understand my post but this ok (if you are in 2nd grade and can only read and write so I hope this is the case)

1. No

What?

2. Why so aggressive

why not? I like it

3. Why ETM?

once again: why not?
it can be stm but it doesn't really matter

why the alg.cubing.net screenshot?

 

[brododragon]

ok then why you did you post

I would guess that he posted just to say that if it had been a FMC solve, it wouldn't of been sub-30. Emphasis on if.

What?

You are wrong.

it can be stm but it doesn't really matter

why the alg.cubing.net screenshot?

Because it's 19 ETM.

 

[BradyLawrence]

I would guess that he posted just to say that if it had been a FMC solve, it wouldn't of been sub-30. Emphasis on if.

Yeah that was exactly the intention of the post.

P.S. I am not in 2nd grade, I am a sophomore.

 

[fun at the joy]

You are wrong.

Because it's 19 ETM.

I know that the wiki says that ETM counts rotations but it doesn't make sense at all to count inspection rotations as moves

but ok here is the f2l in 17:
R' B' L S
U B U'
S L' S'
F L' F' L' F L F'
are you happy now?

I would guess that he posted just to say that if it had been a FMC solve, it wouldn't of been sub-30. Emphasis on if.

Yeah that was exactly the intention of the post.

if this was the intention of the post it is still completely worthless because this is obviously not about fmc

P.S. I am not in 2nd grade, I am a sophomore.

ok I don't know what that means and google translate doesn't really help me either

 

[brododragon]

I know that the wiki says that ETM counts rotations but it doesn't make sense at all to count inspection rotations as moves

That's called STM. So, your solve was "ETM but not", not "STM"?

if this was the intention of the post it is still completely worthless because this is obviously not about fmc

Yes, I know. But let's remember the if. He was just saying that because you mentioned sub-30, which wouldn't have worked like that if you were doing an event that cares about movecount.

ok I don't know what that means and google translate doesn't really help me either

Wait are joking or do you really not know what a sophomore is? Kinda ironic after calling someone a second grader.

 

[Cuberstache]

Wait are joking or do you really not know what a sophomore is? Kinda ironic after calling someone a second grader.

He's from Germany so they probably just don't use those names there. @fun at the joy it means 10th grade

Now let's move this argument to PMs if it must continue and keep the thread on-topic, thanks

 

[fun at the joy]

That's called STM. So, your solve was "ETM but not", not "STM"?

ok I don't care, the f2l is done in 17 etm as you can see in my previous post

Wait are joking or do you really not know what a sophomore is? Kinda ironic after calling someone a second grader.

firstly i didn't call him a second grader, people who are able to read can easily see this and I think even In the us they teach reading in first grade

secondly
nice making fun of someone who isn't a native English speaker and isn't familiar with American school system
google translate only says "student in the second year"

Now let's move this argument to PMs if it must continue and keep the thread on-topic, thanks

ok I'm done with that
it really isn't worth it to argue with people who can not be taught

 

[brododragon]

it really isn't worth it to argue with people who can not be taught

Lol such a nice way to end an argument. Anyway, let's move on from this argument because I do not have the mental capacity to learn. Sorry about that.

 

[mencarikebenaran]

once again accidental xx cross , not planned.

L2 B2 U2 L D2 R' D2 R2 U2 L B' D2 R D' F2 D2 U L2 B D2

x y2 // inspection
L' D' F U R' F2 // xx-cross

 

[CodingCuber]

Ok... seems pretty heated in here. Just came here to post this pretty neat scramble i got
B2 L2 B2 D' B2 L2 U2 B2 L2 F R' U' R F L2 B D L2 B'

 

[Username: Username:]

Généré par csTimer le 2020-08-09
Résolution: 25.92

Liste des temps:
1. 25.92 U' F' R U2 B' R2 U' R L F R2 B' R2 D2 B2 U2 B R2 D2 F' R2

pretty nice scramble for the CP method that you know I'm talking about (lel Briggs or YruRU)

 

[Jam88]

Ok... seems pretty heated in here. Just came here to post this pretty neat scramble i got
B2 L2 B2 D' B2 L2 U2 B2 L2 F R' U' R F L2 B D L2 B'

this is amazing!

 

[fun at the joy]

F2 D2 U2 L2 D F2 U' B2 F2 U' B' R B D R' U' L' U' F2 U'

Spoiler: f2l in 15

y2
F2 R2 D' U2 R E2 // xcross
R U' R' // f2l2
U' Rw' F' M' U R // f2l3+fl24

 

[Owen Morrison]

F B D2 F' R L' D L' U2 F L2 U2 B2 L2 F' L2 B' U2 B'

2x2 block already solved!

Spoiler: Cube solved in 29

x2 U2 R' F U' R' F // XX cross
y' U2 R U R' U2 L' U' L U' F' U' F d' L' U L // F2L
F R U R' U' F' U2 // LL/SPOILER]

 

[qwr]

new 2x2 PB: R' F R2 U R F' U2 F' R2

U2 L // first face
R' F R2 U' R2' F R // OLL
U2 // PBL skip

10 HTM Ortega solve

 

[Cubing5life]

B2 D2 U' L2 D' B2 R2 B2 D B2 L2 F' U' F D2 F' U2 F2 R B2

Jay actually posted this as the next scramble in the example solve thread. You can check out my solution there!

 

[Owen Morrison]

Generated By csTimer on 2020-08-12
single: 6.880

Time List:
747. 6.880 UR6+ DR5+ DL1+ UL1+ U1+ R5+ D6+ L2- ALL1- y2 U0+ R2- D2- L0+ ALL3+

New clock pb, stupidly easy scramble.

 

[qwr]

Absolutely ridiculous 2x2 scramble: F U2 R F U R' U' F' R'
5 moves and part of sune alg.
I don't think I'll ever beat this one.

 

[BenChristman1]

Absolutely ridiculous 2x2 scramble: F U2 R F U R' U' F' R'
5 moves and part of sune alg.
I don't think I'll ever beat this one.

What did you get?

 

[Owen Morrison]

3 meme scrambles in a row for clock

790. 6.580 UR0+ DR5- DL0+ UL3- U3- R1- D1- L3+ ALL5+ y2 U0+ R1- D1- L1+ ALL4+ DL UL
791. 7.510 UR5- DR3+ DL1+ UL6+ U1- R3+ D1+ L4+ ALL4+ y2 U3+ R1+ D4- L1- ALL4+ DL
792. 7.970 UR5- DR1- DL4+ UL3- U4+ R2- D0+ L2- ALL1- y2 U4- R4- D0+ L0+ ALL2- UL