Sajwo
Member
You should stick with CFOP, it's better
You should stick with CFOP, it's better
There is just so much wrong here.
CFOP is suitable for OH, WF and 4x4 - NxN. Progress is fast, look ahead is easy and you can learn countless number of extension and new techniques for improving your solves.
Roux is heavily based on intuition, so when stress enter the game, times are very unstable. Look ahead is unsettled because the DF and DB edges are not visible and there is small amount of additional techniques (if there are any..)
CFOP is universal method, I think it's worth to have few more moves in a solve to gain so much in a return
Roux is suitable for OH, FM, 4x4 and leads to better 2x2. Lookahead is not restricted in so I don't really get what you are saying there.
The additional techniques are within the block building itself as well as EO CMLL.
And what on earth do you mean times are unstable? It's really no worse than CFOP there. My sd for Ao100 was ~0.57 on my last set.
You also have more transferable skills for Roux to CFOP. For example X-cross is easier to do and many CMLLs are essentially COLLs.
Can you even prove that Roux is better for OH than CFOP? Maybe there are techniques for doing M's, but let's be honest... it's not the best way. 4x4 and Roux? Maybe it could work, if Yau<Reduction
Maybe because it doesn't need it. Alex had the second fastest average in the world with what was essentially "standard Roux"Not too much
Because stress and intuition doesn't go in pair.
Then it's a good choice to practise Roux and switch to CFOP
I think that for only 3x3 Roux may be a little better than CFOP. But solving only 3x3 is boring.
Can you even prove that Roux is better for OH than CFOP? Maybe there are techniques for doing M's, but let's be honest... it's not the best way.
CFOP is suitable for OH, WF and 4x4 - NxN. Progress is fast, look ahead is easy and you can learn countless number of extension and new techniques for improving your solves.
Roux is heavily based on intuition, so when stress enter the game, times are very unstable. Look ahead is unsettled because the DF and DB edges are not visible and there is small amount of additional techniques (if there are any..)
CFOP is universal method, I think it's worth to have few more moves in a solve to gain so much in a return
roux works for OH and 4x4.
Sexy method also works. But it kinda sucks
This. Zz is a very cool method.With ZZ you'll only need 28 algs for a 2-look last layer, and a lot of what you've learned from CFOP will be applicable.
Just saying.
What's sexy method?Sexy method also works. But it kinda sucks
Sexy method also works. But it kinda sucks
What's sexy method?
Don't switch to Roux because you want to be faster. Check out Roux and see if it's more fun. Roux and CFOP have both been shown to be effective methods used by world-class solvers. Pick the method that's the most fun, and go with it.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
E | Should I switch back from ZZ to Roux? | Cubing Help & Questions | 41 | |
Should I switch to Yau on 5x5? | Cubing Help & Questions | 17 | ||
D | Should I switch to Roux? | Cubing Help & Questions | 28 | |
Should +2's be switched to DNF's officially? | WCA Regulations | 97 | ||
[Help Thread] Should I keep using CFOP or switch? | Cubing Help & Questions | 10 |