Should WCA Bring Back Age Statistics?

Should WCA Bring Back Age vs Speed and Other Age Statistics?

  • Yes, it would be great to have age stats!

    Votes: 202 75.4%
  • No, I dislike the age stats (please specify why).

    Votes: 22 8.2%
  • I don't care.

    Votes: 44 16.4%

  • Total voters
    268
I'm mostly the person responsible for the push to ensure that competitor birthdates are completely private, after several years of inconsistency. The only concrete thing I ever found someone tell me is that birthdates were being collected solely to tell apart competitors with the same names, but clearly we weren't adhering to that.

The issue basically comes down to this:

Birthdates are used for things like ID, credit cards, other security type things. And some people just don't want their ages made public for the world.
We have birth data from a lot of countries, where competitors might have various expectations about how data is used.
At the very least, I will always argue against publishing data "in mass", e.g. putting birthdates on WCA profiles. Listing the age as a year isn't much better, because it still reveals some information, and it's possible to find out ages by checking pages every day to see when the age increases.

As a comparison, consider Facebook. Even with their usual disregard for privacy defaults, they help you keep your age private, and generally only show your birth month+day to your friends.
*Unfortunately*, the useful statistics for the WCA are the other way around: comparisons are interesting when you know the age, and the day of the year doesn't tell you much.


Now, there's no reason this policy couldn't change.
I think the most reasonable approach is to publish ages only when we have the competitor's explicit consent , and with a specific license to use it for e.g. age statistics (rather than a free "the WCA can publish it how they want"). That way, young/old competitors who care about age statistics can be visible on them. We could also ask organizers to contact competitors privately, saying "you would be on this record page, do you give us permission to display your name and age?"

But any decent proposal should address a few things:
- We have birthdates of competitors who may never compete again, who have not given consent for their age may be published, and quite possibly expect it to be private
- This policy either be opt-in, or very clear when a competitor registers.
- It shouldn't be too much of a logistical burden on competitors, organizers, and the WCA website team.
- Unlike sports with age divisions, there's no fundamental *need* for us to have birthdates in order to operate. So we should be clear to competitors about what it means to give their birthdate.

I think the simplest solution *if we had accounts on the WCA website* would be to make his a preference that can be selected during registration, with a specific and positively worded "do you allow us to publish your age for X, Y, and Z?" checkbox.


If people like age statistics, discussion is welcome. However, we need a concrete proposal for any changes. Preferably one that doesn't assume that competitors would like their ages to be published by default (even only some competitors, in statistics).
 
36.337 years, then (though maybe your "rough" means this isn't allowed). Now hm he t making this up to be a pain in the ass, I'm bringing this up because in the end, ages *were* printed like that (though just with one decimal, i.e., like 36.3)..
As I said above, I meant whole years. There's no reason to display someone's birthdate or age in days, it's just not relevant.

Lucas makes sense above. I'd suggest collecting birth date, displaying only age in whole years, and making the whole thing optional for new registrants and opt-in for current ones. If you want to keep it private, don't give your birthdate and you'll be excluded from the stats.
 
I think the simplest solution *if we had accounts on the WCA website* would be to make his a preference that can be selected during registration, with a specific and positively worded "do you allow us to publish your age for X, Y, and Z?" checkbox.

I thought the same thing when reading the top part of your post. If we created accounts on the website, then people can opt-in that way. The only problem is, how do we verify they are who they say they are.

Another option is to create a thread on the WCA forum and just have people post there. If they really want it to be public, I think they could create an account if they didn't have one.
 
We have birth data from a lot of countries, where competitors might have various expectations about how data is used.

Well, in the 2008-2012 regulations, it was clear that birth dates could be made public, as they were explicitly excluded from the confidential data. And I never heard someone complain about it. Plus I'd be surprised if we "violated anybody's expectations" with what we actually did/do (highlight people for their achievements, and very few).

I think the simplest solution *if we had accounts on the WCA website* would be to make his a preference

Yes, that would be better (it's actually one of the reasons I've been wanting accounts for a long time (never got around to do it, obviously)). Though, there would still be the issue with the kids being forced to cube.

If people like age statistics, discussion is welcome. However, we need a concrete proposal for any changes.

Thanks. I appreciate you speaking up here, and being open for discussion.

As I said above, I meant whole years.

Wow, I actually missed that post. Sorry.
 
How about only oldest because youngest is bad because parents force whereas it's personal preference for oldest?
This is a good point. Despite what Stefan said it is certainly far easier (morally, legally, logistically) to force a young child to spend most of their free time doing something (if you are their parent) than to force anyone else to do the same.

Well, in the 2008-2012 regulations, it was clear that birth dates could be made public, as they were explicitly excluded from the confidential data. And I never heard someone complain about it. Plus I'd be surprised if we "violated anybody's expectations" with what we actually did/do (highlight people for their achievements, and very few).
This is also a very good point. I focus on the lack of complaints. Most competitors who have had their birth dates available to the WCA had no problem with it, and indeed, the vast majority of the birth information was never actually made available on the website. Anyway, even before the rule change, the WCA has generally been extremely careful with its birthdate information. I don't think theoretical complaints are enough to worry about our policies.



I would personally like to see age-related statistics return. One idea - which I haven't seen mentioned - is to use the exact dates in computing statistics, but to then display dates by years only. With multiple 4-year-old solvers they would be ordered by actual age in days, making the rank accurate, but they would be displayed simply as 4 years old. In fact, since age is computed as the difference between the birth date and the competition date, you couldn't just extract the date by refreshing every day - the age would not change unless the person broke their record. Indeed, a youngest solver's record age would *never* change.

Of course, I would also agree that only necessary ages should be displayed (so no appearance on WCA profiles, in public database exports, etc.) and that if anyone wishes they can request for their age information to not be shown or used in any way (which would make them ineligible for any age statistics).
 
To get rid of the age information, in calculating ages, an obvious way is to take into account only two pieces of information: The year the person was born and the year the competition was given.

It's easy to verify that I was born Feb 28, 1958. So for a contest in 2013, my age would be one less than the difference or "54". That would mean that for any contest in the year 2013, my age would be 54.xx or 55.xx and so my age would be "54 or older", and my numbers would go into the "54" age group.

We might choose to model WCA behavior on US government FERPA regulations. These are the regulations that define what information about students is considered "public" and can be released without the permission of the students and/or their parents. Here is what the US government gives as the standard form to send to parents to give them notice that information can be made public without their explicit permission:

If you do not want [School District] to disclose directory information from your child's education records without your prior written consent, you must notify the District in writing by [insert date]. [School District] has designated the following information as directory information: [Note: an LEA may, but does not have to, include all the information listed below.]

Student's name
Address
Telephone listing
Electronic mail address
Photograph
Date and place of birth
Major field of study
Dates of attendance
Grade level
Participation in officially recognized activities and sports
Weight and height of members of athletic teams
Degrees, honors, and awards received
The most recent educational agency or institution attended
Student ID number, user ID, or other unique personal identifier used to communicate in electronic systems that cannot be used to access education records without a PIN, password, etc. (A student's SSN, in whole or in part, cannot be used for this purpose.)
http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/mndirectoryinfo.html

Here are some examples of public school records (in the US) showing date of birth for both college and school kids and various atheletes. I tried to avoid getting two links from the same school but after a while they all seem alike to me:
http://www.msuspartans.com/sports/m-baskbl/mtt/nix_derrick00.html
http://juniorpioneerssoccer.com/images/LAURAPROFILE1.pdf
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/player/_/id/45913/mason-plumlee
http://webapp.rlc.edu/warriors/wrestling/bios.php
http://www.caller2.com/specials/islanders/menstats.html
http://byuhockey.org/offense.html
http://www.gozips.com/sports/fball/2013-14/releases/20130206zkp8d8
http://bigleaguefutures.net/1/2012/06/26/2013-mlb-draft-profile-austin-meadows/
http://www.kuathletics.com/sports/m-baskbl/mtt/jeff_withey_399962.html
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/g/gwynnto01.shtml
http://www.dontbelieveus.com/cobie-smulders-height-and-weight-favorites-hot/
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/specials/michellewie/
http://www.mgoblue.com/sports/m-baskbl/mtt/spike_albrecht_817179.html
http://dramaticddt.wordpress.com/rosters/ddt-roster/
http://www.usrowing.org/Pressbox/AthleteBios/AdrienneMartelli.aspx
http://sports.yahoo.com/golf/champions/players/Tom+Kite/105
http://www.nfl.com/player/andrejohnson/2505551/profile
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/player/_/id/40989/jeff-withey
http://www.gopsusports.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/matthew_mcgloin_372057.html
http://wmpeople.wm.edu/asset/index/rugbym/roster2012
http://www2.suffolk.edu/15424.html
http://www.shepherd.edu/2ramsweb/HARRIS2003.html
http://webpages.eng.wayne.edu/~aj7668/wsu.html
http://www.unc.edu/~waller/pictures.html
http://college.holycross.edu/studentorgs/hockey/info_fpowers.htm
http://www.lcsc.edu/athletics/Baseball/2002/02baseprodietz.htm
http://www.spsu.edu/mensbasketball/DevonButlerbio_32.pdf

I was doing a US search but this one from Australia slipped in:
http://www.mounties.com.au/site_files/s1001/files/2013/squads/Brandon_Bannici.pdf
 
Last edited:
Well he won't be 21 until later this year. Here's another, with no "hooker" involved:
http://www.mounties.com.au/site_files/s1001/files/2013/squads/Jade_Ferguson.pdf

Got to be one of those US vs Australia slang word differences.

Some more Australian birth records for competitors:
http://www.goldcoast.com.au/sport/gold-coast-blaze-player-profiles.html
http://www.birdclubs.com.au/bird-clubs-articles/1998/1/28/falcons-1998/
http://www.perthredbacks.asn.au/profiles/boys/Ty Barnes.html
http://www.worldnet.com.au/stef_website/aboutstef.htm
http://www.sydneyunirugby.com.au/player-profiles/heslop

May as well add some links from other countries before I go to bed:

Japan
http://www.jpn-gym.or.jp/english/gymnast/profile_2007wch_JPN_w.pdf
http://www.densomotorsports.jp/en/wec/drivers/index3.html
http://snsdforever993.blogspot.jp/p/girls-generation-member-profile.html [needs to be seen to be believed]
http://www.sanfrecce.co.jp/en/player/top/tadanari_lee.html

Czech Republic
http://www.jarek-janis.cz/EN/biography.html
http://www.patrikhajek.cz/en/bio/profile
http://www.sparta.cz/srv/www/en/football/team/viewMemberDetail.do?memberId=1202
http://www.tj-lokomotiva-cheb.cz/stit36/images/SoupiskyUKR.pdf

Greece
http://www.target-sport.gr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1962&Itemid=122&lang=en
http://www.asportman.gr/api/index.php/players_en/attack_en/3184.html
http://www.sport-manager.gr/dnatsouras.html
http://www.arisbc.gr/en/Aleksandar-Vezenkov
http://www.icehockey.gr/en/index.php/4-polykarpos-amanatidis/ [ice hockey in Greece!]
http://www.target-sport.gr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1560&Itemid=77&lang=en


France
http://webetab.ac-bordeaux.fr/Etablissement/JMonnet/anglais/c1s6_98/doc1.htm
http://www.assotcho.fr/sport/index-en.html [actually former French Africa]


UK:
http://tyco-suzuki.co.uk/riders/stephen-sword
http://www.mogulmanagement.co.uk/
http://kristianthomas.co.uk/about-me/
http://playersheight.blogspot.co.uk/

Canada
http://gbjrminers.goalline.ca/player_profile.php?player_id=724117&team_id=50675&league_id=4435
http://ppanthers.bc.ca/player_profile.php?player_id=1207259&team_id=318417&league_id=23083
http://ramblers.goalline.ca/player_profile.php?player_id=1355452&team_id=116502&league_id=9461
http://www.teamwhistler.ca/blogs/bio
http://ivylovesmusic.blogspot.ca/2010/07/bio-super-junior-member-profile.html (Japanese / Canadian???)
http://www.saanichbraves.ca/roster321/player-roster.html
olympic.ca/backgrounder/2012-2013-canadian-national-bobsleigh-team
http://www.deltaislanders.ca/roster.cfm (year of birth only)

Germany
http://www.schalke04.de/en/team/tea...raxler/page/143-218-15--.html?h=spieler/12719
http://www.thw-provinzial.de/thw/se_tmuel.htm
http://www.vfb.de/en/teams/vfb/team-2012-2013-liste/page/1576-0-1-1361701919.html?9493

Russia
http://www.elitecrew.ru/eng/crew4.php [air-line crew, that is]
http://en.rfs.ru/national_team/woman/women_national_team/contains/13662.html
http://en.fc-zenit.ru/main/team/players/11644.html
http://kazan2013.ru/hide/en/-240/Root/CountryInfo/MAS [Actually Maylaysia]
 
Last edited:
Well, in the 2008-2012 regulations, it was clear that birth dates could be made public, as they were explicitly excluded from the confidential data. And I never heard someone complain about it. Plus I'd be surprised if we "violated anybody's expectations" with what we actually did/do (highlight people for their achievements, and very few).

Yes, there wasn't much to complain about, because birthdates were public on all profiles for only a limited time. The Regulations never stated clearly what *could* be done with them, and I had a hard time getting any good answer. The WCA website also fluctuated between essentially treating them as private to making all of them public for a short period of time. The export never had birthdates, though, so there was

As mentioned in my previous post, the only thing I ever heard was that birthdate collection start to tell competitors with the same name apart, but I don't even remember when I heard this, and from whom. There *was* no straight story, so the 2013 Regulations included this provision to set the story straight, at least unless the community consciously decides otherwise.

Here's an email I sent on June 10, 2010, with the current Board (Ron and Tyson) CCed:

Yeah, this keeps coming up. I don't know how it is elsewhere, but in America birthdates are by courtesy assumed to be private for official and/or personal use. I know girls/women who wouldn't be comfortable to give it out, even for a reason like competing.

And in our case, we would make anyone's birthdate really easy to find with a simple online search.

Some competitors in the past people (before 2009) have been a bit hesitant to give their birthday to give it out, and I've assured them that it's only for internal WCA use. This applies particularly to people who require encouragement to become interested in cubing (You made me come for you, and now you want to use my birthdate?)


Okay, at this point I'm repeating myself from the past, but I think birthdates should be completely private, and the WCA registration form should not reveal it (the eventual solution would be WCA web accounts).
Thanks, Jim, for finding those links.


Regardless of my stance, the WCA should be clear about its stance. Right now, most people assume that the birt date is purposefully absent from profiles.

The following line is not clear at all:
2d) All information (except: name, country, date of birth, gender, selected events and competition results) must be used for the competition only, and may only be given to other organisations/persons after permission from the competitor.
Nowhere do the regs say what the WCA may do with the data. Only this line, suggesting that there are restrictions.

Would it be possible to resolve this and make an official policy announcement, and an eventual clarification in the regulations?

The links mentioned by Jim Mertens that I was referring to:
Most USA sports organizations actually do not allow date-of-birth to be published, although they sometimes allow age or age group (in years only) to be published. If they do publish data containing birthdates, they then usually expressly prohibit associating those birthdates with names.

Here is an example policy from USA Swimming which only allows age in years to be published:
http://www.usaswimming.org/_Rainbow/Documents/e426a6d7-d937-49db-a878-13b30c3891ff/Section%2013%20Privacy%20Policy.pdf
Here is a more strict USA Gymnastics policy which doesn't allow age or DOB to be published:
http://www.usa-gymnastics.org/pages/post.html?PostID=2596&prog=h
 
Don't know if someone has said this yet or if they have said it this way, but why not measure by birth year. Anyone born in 1968 is the same age throught the year 2013--45. I would love to see competitions have some recognition for age, unofficially at least. We could have prizes for people born in age group sub-categories, like road races.
 
Don't know if someone has said this yet or if they have said it this way, but why not measure by birth year. Anyone born in 1968 is the same age throught the year 2013--45. I would love to see competitions have some recognition for age, unofficially at least. We could have prizes for people born in age group sub-categories, like road races.

What if I was born December 31, 1968 and somebody else was born January 1, 1968? Then we're nearly an entire year apart
 
What if I was born December 31, 1968 and somebody else was born January 1, 1968? Then we're nearly an entire year apart
That fact does not bother me. With a cut off that is what you get. Many sports do it the same way. For example, with youth hockey in the US, kids compete by birth year. I submit the the difference is less important with cubing than it is with physical activity, where extreme difference is physical development can mean injury.

I would love to see age divisions in competitions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am nearly 60 years old. I enjoyed telling my friends that I was the 2nd (or 3rd or 4th) oldest blindfold solver in the World Cubing Association. I had the link in my Facebook posts and my "about" section. The only reason I attended competitions was to see my name on the Statistics page and show it off to my friends. I also enjoyed showing people that 90 year olds and 3 year olds can solve a Rubik's Cube. Now I tell them that old blindfold solvers are rare, but I have no way to prove my point.

I have not gone to competitions since the age statistics disappeared. If the statistics for "Oldest Blindfold Solvers" come back, I will very likely attend competitions again.
 
I am nearly 60 years old. I enjoyed telling my friends that I was the 2nd (or 3rd or 4th) oldest blindfold solver in the World Cubing Association. I had the link in my Facebook posts and my "about" section. The only reason I attended competitions was to see my name on the Statistics page and show it off to my friends. I also enjoyed showing people that 90 year olds and 3 year olds can solve a Rubik's Cube. Now I tell them that old blindfold solvers are rare, but I have no way to prove my point.

I have not gone to competitions since the age statistics disappeared. If the statistics for "Oldest Blindfold Solvers" come back, I will very likely attend competitions again.
I posted once and it got deleted, so let's try this again.

If the statistics are to be brought back, I think it should be for reasons other than giving cubers of a certain age recognition. Among other reasons, I think your point that "90 year olds and 3 year olds can solve cubes" is a good reason to bring the statistics back. It gives good press to cubing, thus helping and expanding the community. I don't agree with your other reason, however. I find it off putting that you won't even go to competitions unless you get recognition for doing so, and it's not ample cause for the WCA to change one of it policies.
The issue is that you can tell someone's birth date by when the year switches over.
It would take real work to find birth dates using that. There are many easier targets for anybody looking to use birth date information for something malicious. Yes, it could in theory cause a problem, but I think the odds of it are pretty low. Pragmatically, the drawbacks to making that information public likely don't outweigh the benefits of having data on ages. In any case, there could be privacy options that allow people the choice to not disclose their age at all, so I don't think privacy needs to be a reason for this not to happen. As long as everybody has the option to keep their information secret, I don't see a problem.
 
Last edited:
It would take real work to find birth dates using that. There are many easier targets for anybody looking to use birth date information for something malicious. Yes, it could in theory cause a problem, but I think the odds of it are pretty low. Pragmatically, the drawbacks to making that information public likely don't outweigh the benefits of having data on ages. In any case, there could be privacy options that allow people the choice to not disclose their age at all, so I don't think privacy needs to be a reason for this not to happen. As long as everybody has the option to keep their information secret, I don't see a problem.

As things are now, no one has the option, nor does anyone give consent for their age-related data to be publicly released, which it technically is in your earlier scenario. This potentially creates legal problems for the WCA.

I would be all for it if people were able to have accounts on the WCA website, with the choice to opt-in to having their age released.
 
I find it off putting that you won't even go to competitions unless you get recognition for doing so, and it's not ample cause for the WCA to change one of it policies.

Surely everyone goes to competition to get recognition, otherwise what's the point of going? You can always cube on your own or with a group of friends.
 
I can't be bothered to read this thread again, but I'm sure this was already addressed. The issue is that you can tell someone's birth date by when the year switches over.

maybe make the updating of the age weekly or monthly, so people wont know the exact date?
 
Back
Top