MHordecki
Member
As in the topic.
ZZ's quite interesting method, but it largely unknown in non-Polish speedcubing communities (like speedsolving.com). It's basically due to the fact that almost every information about ZZ is in Polish, which isn't lingua franca, I dunno why.
Because of that I've decided to write an article about it. I'm publishing it in early phase to provoke a discussion (as for today, there are only three persons that use ZZ as their primary method, so there are areas to improve). There are few thing to polish in my article:
And, of course, the link: http://www.emsee.110mb.com/Speedcubing/ZZ speedcubing system.html
Enjoy!
IMO ZZ is a wonderful method that fill the gap between Fridrich and intuitive methods, such as Petrus.
ZZ's quite interesting method, but it largely unknown in non-Polish speedcubing communities (like speedsolving.com). It's basically due to the fact that almost every information about ZZ is in Polish, which isn't lingua franca, I dunno why.
Because of that I've decided to write an article about it. I'm publishing it in early phase to provoke a discussion (as for today, there are only three persons that use ZZ as their primary method, so there are areas to improve). There are few thing to polish in my article:
- One of the concepts, called 'phasing' is covered only by theory, not by factual, practical experiences
- I'm in the process of generating my own ZZLL algs, but it's still far to go.
- Generally, expand everything
And, of course, the link: http://www.emsee.110mb.com/Speedcubing/ZZ speedcubing system.html
Enjoy!
IMO ZZ is a wonderful method that fill the gap between Fridrich and intuitive methods, such as Petrus.
Last edited: