the_chad
Member
zblls were used in many world record solves, what else you need to know?Yeh the whole video is about eoline and no zbll. Great reference. You have your own opinion or no?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
zblls were used in many world record solves, what else you need to know?Yeh the whole video is about eoline and no zbll. Great reference. You have your own opinion or no?
You didn't even understand my question lol.... you just joined like 8 days ago. Your misinformed or you can't wrap your head around eo. Don't bash it because of thatzblls were used in many world record solves, what else you need to know?
You didn't even understand my question lol.... you just joined like 8 days ago. Your misinformed or you can't wrap your head around eo. Don't bash it because of that
You can solve pieces at the same time...it's not just about the rotations. It halves the cases. Improves look ahead and deduction. It also can let you spam tps like crazy. No you don't understand lolyes, in eo you make additional moves to solve 0 additional pieces, but instead don't have to rotate. you could invest that time into extending to xcross.
You can solve pieces at the same time...it's not just about the rotations. It halves the cases. Improves look ahead and deduction. It also can let you spam tps like crazy. No you don't understand lol
Do you have to be the best in the world for a method to work well for you? No, of course not. It's stupid to say because Max uses CFOP and has better look ahead then you, zz must be not worth it for lookahead. Sure, EOcross takes 3-4 more moves, but there is no reason to say those extra few moves can't be beneficial and made up during rotationless F2L and LL.you don't understand.what else should i expect from person whose nickname starts with zz. do you have better look ahead than max park? or do you spam tps like ruihang? eoline, eocross etc take extra moves to orient the edges. those moves could be used to solve additional pieces at the cost of rotations.
Do you have to be the best in the world for a method to work well for you? No, of course not. It's stupid to say because Max uses CFOP and has better look ahead then you, zz must be not worth it for lookahead. Sure, EOcross takes 3-4 more moves, but there is no reason to say those extra few moves can't be beneficial and made up during rotationless F2L and LL.
3-4 moves isn't that much if it saves you moves in LL and time on rotations. Move count isn't everything.i agree. but 3x3 is short event where 3-4 moves is already a lot. in 4x4 and 5x5 you can make such sacrifices with yau and it will be beneficial every time.
And in CFOP you use those same moves to Orient the Edges during OLL. Or you really use ZB and use those moves to orient edges during ZBLS. Or you use Roux and Orient Edges during 4a. Or you could orient Edges during EO in Petrus.you don't understand.what else should i expect from person whose nickname starts with zz. do you have better look ahead than max park? or do you spam tps like ruihang? eoline, eocross etc take extra moves to orient the edges. those moves could be used to solve additional pieces at the cost of rotations.
And in CFOP you use those same moves to Orient the Edges during OLL. Or you really use ZB and use those moves to orient edges during ZBLS. Or you use Roux and Orient Edges during 4a. Or you could orient Edges during EO in Petrus.
Face it, you orient Edges in every popular method. If you want an objective view on it, doing it at the beginning of the solve it actually more efficient because of the freedom you can get 2-3 move EO Cases pretty often. The shortest OLL is 6 moves and you get that rarely. Or Sledge, the shortest ZBLS at 4 moves, you can force it MOST of the time, if you do Edge Control during 3rd slot, again adding moves.
So 70% of CFOP development that I've seen the last 10 years is about reducing rotations during F2L. But now you come along and tell us that no, rotations are good, as long as you don't do a little move at the start of your solve.
If you ask if I'm as fast as Ruihang, no. Not since the accident I have not been able to regain fast fingers. Doesn't stop me from knowing that a baseless claim is just stupid and you made one.
On another note, I've looked at your profile yesterday and every post except maybe two is completely idiotic. Why are you actively trying to troll?
Doesn't ZZ average less moves than CFOP, like by 5-10 moves? Feel like that may be relevant here.i agree. but 3x3 is short event where 3-4 moves is already a lot
Doesn't ZZ average less moves than CFOP, like by 5-10 moves? Feel like that may be relevant here.
Go get your own opinion not someone else'sfunny how you think I am the troll here, when it's you trying to convince the whole world that zz is equally as fast as cfop. just watch the video of almighty Jayden McNeill.
Roux is greatroux also has low movecount but is equally bad as zz. the strenght of cfop is not within movecount but other aspects
ZZ is bad because you do 3 extra moves except that you do less moves in total but that's bad still because its not about movecountroux also has low movecount but is equally bad as zz. the strenght of cfop is not movecount but other aspects
ZZ is bad because you do 3 extra moves except that you do less moves in total but that's bad still because its not about movecount
No man, Roux is trash.Roux is great![]()
Just a little tip, short closed ended messages like this leave no room to continue or to run more circles so if you want to continue trolling on the forums then avoid these.exactly. thank you
Just a little tip, short closed ended messages like this leave no room to continue or to run more circles so if you want to continue trolling on the forums then avoid these.
Tell me more about what happened in the cubing community a few years ago 1 week member.my point is zz is bad no matter the circumstances. as a method enthusiast and theoretist you should be aware of that. i don't know why we are arguing here about the obvious. it was well agreed inside community a few years ago that zz must exit big3