Random Cubing Discussion

Let's say we denote R2 as Rh. Now we can denote the slices in this way: R2, R3, R4 and so on. Then, we can have one-way expressions like these: Rw4h (4Rw2), Lw3h' (3Lw2'), Rw2-4h (2-4Rw2).
What do you think?
 
Let's say we denote R2 as Rh. Now we can denote the slices in this way: R2, R3, R4 and so on. Then, we can have one-way expressions like these: Rw4h (4Rw2), Lw3h' (3Lw2'), Rw2-4h (2-4Rw2).
What do you think?
Nice idea, and something that could be used for 6x6 and up, but I think we already have a too established notation system to make any major changes. Good idea tho.
 
Lol
 

Attachments

  • B1B38225-291F-469C-83F5-2D56E5E60E2C.png
    B1B38225-291F-469C-83F5-2D56E5E60E2C.png
    117.9 KB · Views: 32
What's the average optimal movecount for solving 1) a face 2) a layer, on skewb?
 
Back
Top