PenguinsDontFly
Legend
no problem. once you learn eg1, you will realize how easy it is to set up the cases the way you want them and how easy it is to one look.
no problem. once you learn eg1, you will realize how easy it is to set up the cases the way you want them and how easy it is to one look.
still working on cll there's a few cases im too lazy to learn
do you know eg-2?
PenguinsDontFly
Legend
still working on cll there's a few cases im too lazy to learn
do you know eg-2?
ooh no way. I started eg 1 last week and I only know 4/7 sets, but I force the face to give me the cases I know, and if I cant see a way to do it efficiently, I pick another face/maybe a layer. CLL is meh.
yeah, cll is definitely meh, but I can do full faces pretty efficiently so its Gucci.
gonna learn eg-1 soon but I just don't have enough time :/
also we should prob take this to the pms so we don't spam this thread
Berkmann18
Regular
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2014
- Messages
- 245
- Location
- London, United Kingdom
- WCA ID
- 2014BERK02
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Yeah.
Berd
Legend
Don't forget the O set! You know 5/8 sets! (Seeing as it's only a 2 alg set for eg-1 lol.)
guysensei1
Legend
Has anyone ever gotten a megaminx LL skip?
Berd
Legend
What are the odds for that?
StachuK1992
statue
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 3,812
- Location
- West Chester, PA
- WCA ID
- 2008KORI02
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
rough upper bound
CO: 3^4
CP: 5!
EO: 2^4
EP: 5!
vs similar 3x3 upper bound
CO: 3^3
CP: 4!
EO: 2^3
EP: 4!
(3^4)*(5!)*(2^4)*(5!) = 18,662,400
(3^3)*(4!)*(2^3)*(4!) = 124,416
Really bad figures, but roughly a lot less likely than 3x3
CO: 3^4
CP: 5!
EO: 2^4
EP: 5!
vs similar 3x3 upper bound
CO: 3^3
CP: 4!
EO: 2^3
EP: 4!
(3^4)*(5!)*(2^4)*(5!) = 18,662,400
(3^3)*(4!)*(2^3)*(4!) = 124,416
Really bad figures, but roughly a lot less likely than 3x3
guysensei1
Legend
Well I could have told you that!
Using magic (aka search function)
OLL skip is: 1/1296
PLL skip is: 1/720
LL skip = 1/1296*720 = 1/933120
TheCoolMinxer
Veteran
What can I do against constantly missscrambling? Especially 2x2 and 3x3?
guysensei1
Legend
Turn slow and lookah- wait no just turn slowly
JustinTimeCuber
Legend
Has anyone ever thought of TEG2+ and TEG2-? They would be like TCLL except with an EG-2 case. It would be much harder to create the algorithms for TEG1 because there are 4 times as many.
TDM
Legend
Yes, it's been thought of before. I don't know if algorithms have been generated for it though.
guysensei1
Legend
I learnt a COLL some time ago, and I have not gotten it in the 300+ solves I've done since then. Then today I just got that case 3 times in a row.
Cool stuff.
Cool stuff.
ryanj92
Veteran
CAL pointed out on cyoubx' friends that Daniel Wallin's 4.20 clock single has been changed to a DNF...
does anybody know why that is?
does anybody know why that is?
Evan Liu
Veteran
Daniel himself looked at his video and saw that his 4.20 sec solve in Clock might not be solved at all.
Screenshot of the last frame where the back is visible:
http://imgur.com/2rHXbxs
The video was sent to the board, which agreed to DNF the solve as they and Daniel are quite sure that he does not make a turn to solve the clocks on the back that are off as one of his last moves.
Screenshot of the last frame where the back is visible:
http://imgur.com/2rHXbxs
The video was sent to the board, which agreed to DNF the solve as they and Daniel are quite sure that he does not make a turn to solve the clocks on the back that are off as one of his last moves.
josh42732
Veteran
What's the average time for megaminx and 7x7 if one is a 18-21 second solver on 3x3?
Similar threads
