How do you guys do your EO? I use [U, u, R] and do it two edges at a time. kind of like 3-2-3 for edge pairing. slice, insert bad edge, slice back. any other way to do this?
What should I aim for for my 2x2x3 and eo, separately. Also, should I do Eo with algs, or intuition?
- I use <L,U,R,F> like mDiPalma. I for 2 edges, I do 2 at a time (duh!), for 4 edges, I either do 2 at a time or I use some tricks to orient all edges simultaneously (ex.: M U' M'), and for 6 edges, I do 4 edges and 2 edges and vice versa. So what mDiPalma does.
- 2x2x3: Don't just do 2x2x2 then 2x2x3 - find other methods. EO: Doesn't matter. I use a mix of both, but you be fine with either or.
How do I build my blocks more efficiently? I have started to make pairs and focus on the 2x2x3 as one step like in roux but any tips?
For me in the 2x2x2 stage, I find completed pair(s). Then I find the remaining edges, and see which one is easiest to join with the pair to form the block. Of course, I try to look ahead to the next 2x2x3 pieces, which I usually end up semi-CFOPing just to reduce some thinking time

. But that's the general idea...
I started using petrus a day ago, and average 23, and 16 with CFOP. Is this decent? I do my 2x2x3 with cross/F2L pairs (I know, bad) but I cant seem to wrap my head around finding the pieces for the 2x2x3. Also, is Petrus like Roux and ZZ where Full CN is not needed? because I am full CN with Petrus and get the same times as normal. Also what is considered fast with Petrus? Sorry for the large amount of questions.
- It's pretty normal for your Petrus times to lag behind your times on other methods, especially if you tend to carry on the conventional CFOP F2L pairing techniques into your solves (ruining efficiency). But if you practice more, you're bound to get your Petrus times down to a more feasible range.
- I'm a white cross/first step solver, and I'm at 17-ish seconds. But at least opposite color CN makes things a whole lot easier, at least.