PetrusQuber
Member
Thanks
Lol well that narrows it down to the people on Speedsolving.comAgggGghGhGghg ALert Alert!!!! I saw you had 26 subs, then i went to your about page and it changed to 25! Who is the traitor?
edit: Wait it goes back to 26 when i go back to the home screen false alarm.
PLL, though I was that weird kid who averaged 17 and knew only COLLI'm trying to learn full PLL, but don't know if I should learn COLL instead. Which one do you think is better?
feliks zemdegs doesnt think coll is good at all forr 3x3 he says its faster to do normal oll and pll
But couldn't you just learn COLL recog as a springboard ?In terms of absolute speed, COLL/EPLL isn't better than OCLL/PLL, but ZBLL trumps all. The biggest point of learning COLL is to give you a good ZBLL springboard. So if your end goal is ZBLL, COLL. If you're using Petrus or ZZ or LEOR and ZBLL isn't your end goal, re-examine that.
ZZLL can also bee used between COLL and ZBLL. It one-looks the LL like ZBLL.Thanks. I think I'm going to learn full PLL, then COLL, then ZBLL.
I'll probably learn ZZLL in-between COLL and ZBLL. It will also cut down the algs I have to learn since COLL and ZZLL are parts of ZBLL.ZZLL can also bee used between COLL and ZBLL. It one-looks the LL like ZBLL.
Petrus-b is better then Petrus-VH, but Petrus-a is still better.ZZLL, compared to COLL, has no impact. ZZLL is changing different steps other than LL, whereas you can just learn ZBLL and add it into your solves as you go along.