Easy / Lucky / Hard / Weird scrambles Thread

Here is a 0.28 by Siddharth Reddy, former WR7 avg, you should be able to access the link if you have discord.
Edit: Also found the 0.28 by Phoenix

"0.28" By Phoenix, 26 frames counted = 0.43 seconds ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ Go count them if you don't believe me
 
Last edited:
also where is zayn's video?
Zayn does not have a video for the 0.29. Does it matter? Yihengs recent official 0.54 was on an 8 mover, that TPS on a 4 mover would be sub-0.3. Luke Garrett has a 0.49 on a 7 mover.
That TPS on a 4 mover is also sub-0.3. I don't know what to tell you bud, sub-0.3 is possible and has already been achieved for top cubers. Going back to the post that started this discussion.
0.32 first try
Yes, this is possible, people have done faster.
 
Last edited:
Zayn does not have a video for the 0.29. Does it matter? Yihengs recent official 0.54 was on an 8 mover, that TPS on a 4 mover would be sub-0.3. Luke Garrett has a 0.49 on a 7 mover. (
) That TPS on a 4 mover is also sub-0.3. I don't know what to tell you bud, sub-0.3 is possible for top cubers. Going back to the post that started this discussion.

Yes, this is possible, people have done faster
well, I am going to try to prove you wrong, also if this is so doable, why don't you tell me your 2x2 pb on a 4 mover?
 
You would only need 12 TPS to get sub 0.4, you only had 7 TPS, c'mon bro, you said sub 0.3 was ez and you can't even get sub 0.5 (Wich only needs 10 TPS) on a 5 move, !?!?! Ur so funny dude
Bro, please read the below.
but am I a 2x2er on the level of @precompsubwr or Zayn? Why does my pb matter?
 
Also the video is probably a higher frame rate or he just stopped the timer slightly early which happens a lot when your solving this fast.
Your right! I checked the vid again and found out that the video was not 60 FPS, but instead 30 FPS. I counted the frames again and I counted 13 frames. 13/30 = 0.43 (Once again). If you guys don't believe me, do it yourself, it's really easy to count frames.
 
Back
Top