Easy / Lucky / Hard / Weird scrambles Thread

[YouCubing]

I reconstructed the 2.67 3x3 single on the UWR page, because why not? (It's in this thread because of the lolness of the scramble xD)
B2 L2 D' U' L2 B2 U L2 F2 R' F2 U B U L F2 L' B U2 R (scramble, try it out)
U R U' R // xxcross
L' U2 L2 U L' // F2L3&4
f R U R' U' f' // OLL
The solution was obvious enough that I think this is correct.

 

[JustinTimeCuber]

WHAT IS THIS MADNESS
8.16 D F' R2 B' L F' B2 L2 B' U L2 U L2 B2 L2 D' L2 U D F2

I will edit this post with my solution in a bit I don't have time right now but I had an easy xcross and got a pll skip

oh ok
z2
R2 U' F L' B L2
y2 U' R U R' U' R U' R' U2 R U' R'
U2 y R U R'
y2 U2 R U R' U' R U R'
U R U' R' U2 R U y R U' R' U' F'
U

 

[Kudz]

I reconstructed the 2.67 3x3 single on the UWR page, because why not? (It's in this thread because of the lolness of the scramble xD)
B2 L2 D' U' L2 B2 U L2 F2 R' F2 U B U L F2 L' B U2 R (scramble, try it out)
U R U' R // xxcross
L' U2 L2 U L' // F2L3&4
f R U R' U' f' // OLL
The solution was obvious enough that I think this is correct.

If sb would do that on official would he get FMC WR too? Just wondering, great scramble for anything.

 

[Praetorian]

L F R D' B' D' L' U B' U2 R2 F2 U' L2 U' R2 B2 U' R2 U

3 move 2x2 block

8 move 2x2x3 block

12 move F2L minus 1 pair

 

[YouCubing]

If sb would do that on official would he get FMC WR too? Just wondering, great scramble for anything.

If he did that during an FMC attempt, yes. But because the solution is so obvious, pretty much everyone else doing it would also get the WR.

 

[Ordway Persyn]

I reconstructed the 2.67 3x3 single on the UWR page, because why not? (It's in this thread because of the lolness of the scramble xD)
B2 L2 D' U' L2 B2 U L2 F2 R' F2 U B U L F2 L' B U2 R (scramble, try it out)
U R U' R // xxcross
L' U2 L2 U L' // F2L3&4
f R U R' U' f' // OLL
The solution was obvious enough that I think this is correct.

LOL I got a 5.16 first try and a 3.91 on my second try. I average ~16.

 

[joshsailscga]

I reconstructed the 2.67 3x3 single on the UWR page, because why not? (It's in this thread because of the lolness of the scramble xD)
B2 L2 D' U' L2 B2 U L2 F2 R' F2 U B U L F2 L' B U2 R (scramble, try it out)
U R U' R // xxcross
L' U2 L2 U L' // F2L3&4
f R U R' U' f' // OLL
The solution was obvious enough that I think this is correct.

That's not valid, optimal solution is less than 18 moves.

 

[Sergeant Baboon]

That's not valid, optimal solution is less than 18 moves.

That's not in the regulations, though.

 

[asacuber]

5. (1.048) U2 F' U' R F' U2 R' F' U'


lolol pb and I thought I will never get >6 move scrambles...

 

[asacuber]

5. (1.048) U2 F' U' R F' U2 R' F' U'


lolol pb and I thought I will never get >6 move scrambles...

 

[2180161]

oh ok
z2
R2 U' F L' B L2
y2 U' R U R' U' R U' R' U2 R U' R'
U2 y R U R'
y2 U2 R U R' U' R U R'
U R U' R' U2 R U y R U' R' U' F'
U

solution doesn't work

 

[Hssandwich]

U2 R2 D2 L U2 R' B2 F2 U2 B2 L' F' R U' L2 D2 R D B F2
D' B' D' //2x2x2
U L2 //2x2x3

 

[TDM]

That's not valid, optimal solution is less than 18 moves.

It's anything less than 13 which is filtered.

The reason why it's not valid is that the scramble is fake.

---

18. 11.95 F2 D' F2 R2 D' L2 D2 F2 D2 B2 U2 L' D2 L' F' U2 R2 D' B'

So many easy blocks/pairs. Can anyone find something good with it?

 

[qaz]

It's anything less than 13 which is filtered.

The reason why it's not valid is that the scramble is fake.

---

18. 11.95 F2 D' F2 R2 D' L2 D2 F2 D2 B2 U2 L' D2 L' F' U2 R2 D' B'

So many easy blocks/pairs. Can anyone find something good with it?

z
R' F R' y U R U2 R2 L D2 //xx-cross (9/9)
U R' U2 R U R' F R y' L U' L' //third pair + free pair (11/20)
U' R' U' R U' R' U' R' U' R U' R' U2 R //cancel into 2GLL (14/34)

not great

 

[YouCubing]

It's anything less than 13 which is filtered.

The reason why it's not valid is that the scramble is fake.

Is there any way to prove that? I don't see why it would be.
I also don't see why it wouldn't be.

 

[biscuit]

Is there any way to prove that? I don't see why it would be.
I also don't see why it wouldn't be.

No, there is no way to verify that it's fake, but does that really look legit to you? I think it's pretty obvious that some one reverse engineered that scramble.

 

[KRAMIST]

U2 R2 D2 L U2 R' B2 F2 U2 B2 L' F' R U' L2 D2 R D B F2
D' B' D' //2x2x2
U L2 //2x2x3

U B2 // xxcross
L U2 L' U2 L U' L'// bad pair
U' y R U' R' F' U' F // 4th pair
U' f R U R' U' f' U' F R U R' U' F' // OLLCP
Z perm


doin another 2x2 seession just got this U2 F' U F U R2 F R' U'

 

[mafergut]

No, there is no way to verify that it's fake, but does that really look legit to you? I think it's pretty obvious that some one reverse engineered that scramble.

For me it's obvious it's fake but, let's pretend it's not. Would that be a legit scramble if it came out of TNoodle? And could it? I mean, would it be filtered by the scramble generation process implemented in TNoodle? Of course, the likelyhood of getting such a scramble is pretty low but... also those of winning the lottery

 

[CyanSandwich]

Atrocious 3BLD scramble - U2 R' B U B L F L D L' D2 B2 D2 F D2 L2 B D2 B R2 B'

 

[Sergeant Baboon]

(4, 0)/(2, -4)/(0, 3)/(4, -3)/(-3, 0)/(-1, 0)/(2, -5)/(2, 0)/(-2, 0)/(1, 0)/(-3, -1)/

Is there a way to solve this cubeshape and preserve the orientation? Just curious.