Easy / Lucky / Hard / Weird scrambles Thread

lol F' R' F B2 D2 L' R U2 B2 U' B2 R2 L B2 L2 R2 F2 B2 R2 U' L' D2 L D' B2 would of been a good time, but rage quit cause of pop :(
 
um what?

R' D F2 D' F2 U' B2 D' F2 D' R2 B2 F U L D2 L

a nice F2L:
y z2
r' F r U2 L F' U L
U' L U2 L'
U' R U R'

or this:
y z2
r' F r U2 r U' r'
y' R' U R U2 y R U R'
y U' R' U' R
R' U2 R2 U R D' R U R' D R' U2 R'
(28 with cancellations)
 
My gosh... I screwed this up so bad. Got one of my 5 best times, but it should have been a PB by like at least half a second.

13.37 F' U2 B' L2 F' R2 F' R2 B2 F' L' B D' L' F D2 R U2 B

I solved it something like this, this is improved on the second pair though because of how I do the rotation.

x-cross // z2 U' B R
Second pair // 'y D R U' R' D'
Third pair // U L' U L U2 L' U' L
Fourth pair // y2 U R U' R' y L' U L
OLL // U L F' L' U' L U F U' L'
PLL // R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' U
 
Last edited:
So idk if this is considered a 'scramble' but i thought it was pretty funny anyway.
I was practising plls and aparently cstimer considers this a pll scramble.

scramble:U
 
So idk if this is considered a 'scramble' but i thought it was pretty funny anyway.
I was practising plls and aparently cstimer considers this a pll scramble.

scramble:U

Yeah, it's a PLL skip that needs a U' AUF :)
Somebody mentioned something similar a while ago and, I think it was TDM, somebody said that it would be nice if csTimer could hide the fact that it is a PLL skip with a longer "scramble" so that you are not expecting the skip.
 
Yeah, it's a PLL skip that needs a U' AUF :)
Somebody mentioned something similar a while ago and, I think it was TDM, somebody said that it would be nice if csTimer could hide the fact that it is a PLL skip with a longer "scramble" so that you are not expecting the skip.

I don't think I'd have said it referring to csTimer since I don't like csTimer :p But yes, I think I may have said something like that. Some people won't be expecting PLL skips when they happen. A mix of just AUFs and longer "scrambles" would be ideal imo, since I can usually predict them, or a CP skip at the very least.
 
Just doing some Square-1 practice got this scramble: (3, -1)/(-3, 0)/(-2, 1)/(-4, -1)/(-3, 0)/(0, -3)/(4, 0)/(-3, -3)/(1, 0)/(0, -2)/

Solution:

Cubeshape: / (0, 2) / (-1, 0) / (-3, -3) /
3/4D Layer: (0, -4) / (3, -3) /
L5C: Skip
L5E: (-5, -2) / (-3, 0) / (0, 3) / (-1, -1) / (1, -2) / (3, 0) / (-1, 3)

Nice. I got a 14.06
 
Wasted this with a mid 10.

L D L2 F' L' U2 L F' R' D' L2 B2 U' B2 U' B2 R2 U2 R2 D

y2 x'
R2 U' R D z U x' D' L D
y' U' R' U R
y' U2 R' U R
y' U2 R' U R
U2 r U2 R' U' R U R' U' R U' r'
l U' R' D R U R' D' R U R' D R U' R' D'
 
Back
Top