I think what'd be fun/interesting is seeing how different people solve the same scramble.
It'd be interesting because:
Method: CFOP
Average: low 20s
U' F U2 B D2 R2 D2 R2 F R2 B' L2 F' D' R U L D U L'
z y2 // Inspection
D R' L D' L' // Cross
y' U2 L U L' // Green/Yellow pair
U2 D' L' U L D // White/Blue pair
y' U L U2 L' U' L U L' // Blue/Yellow pair
U R U2 R' (U R U' R') // Green/White pair
F (U R U' R') F' - U2 - R2 D (R' U2 R) D' (R' U2 R') // 2 look OLL
U' F R U' R' U' R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R F' // PLL (Y)
It'd be interesting because:
- Different methods
- Different levels / algorithm sets used
- Even if someone has the same level as you, you can still learn how to solve something (FB, F2L pair, EO ...) more efficiently / differently
- You can get your solve critiqued
Method: CFOP
Average: low 20s
U' F U2 B D2 R2 D2 R2 F R2 B' L2 F' D' R U L D U L'
z y2 // Inspection
D R' L D' L' // Cross
y' U2 L U L' // Green/Yellow pair
U2 D' L' U L D // White/Blue pair
y' U L U2 L' U' L U L' // Blue/Yellow pair
U R U2 R' (U R U' R') // Green/White pair
F (U R U' R') F' - U2 - R2 D (R' U2 R) D' (R' U2 R') // 2 look OLL
U' F R U' R' U' R U R' F' R U R' U' R' F R F' // PLL (Y)