3x3 PBL Theoretical Method (3BL) (CFOP Variant)

Exactly! But I need help on figuring out how to find all the cases. How can I know if I didn't find a case?
Well if you have 126 cases total, you have all algs. If you want to know which cases there are possible on the top, just imagine taking each regular pll and doing a single swap of edges, e.g. a diagonal swap, to each of them. That means there are 22 possible PLL cases. Wait I'm just now realizing that changes the math. 21 cases on the top for Ua, Ub, Z, 22 cases for Adj, Diag, W, gives 21 x 3 + 22 x 3 = 129 cases.
 
Well if you have 126 cases total, you have all algs. If you want to know which cases there are possible on the top, just imagine taking each regular pll and doing a single swap of edges, e.g. a diagonal swap, to each of them. That means there are 22 possible PLL cases. Wait I'm just now realizing that changes the math. 21 cases on the top for Ua, Ub, Z, 22 cases for Adj, Diag, W, gives 21 x 3 + 22 x 3 = 129 cases.
Thank you so much! You make me feel like an idiot!
 
PLL parity only occurs if you have O, W, Adj, or Opp on the D face. To avoid PLL "Parity" you can preform M2 U2 M2 ( this transforms your O, W, Adj, Opp into a EPLL ). All EP cases have already been generated and can be found here, both with and without "Parity".

Also there are 109 non-Parity cases ( including PLL ) and 110 Parity cases. 219 in total.
 
Last edited:
PLL parity only occurs if you have O, W, Adj, or Opp on the D face. To avoid PLL "Parity" you can preform M2 U2 M2 ( this transforms your O, W, Adj, Opp into a EPLL ). All EP cases have already been generated and can be found here, both with and without "Parity".

Also there are 109 non-Parity cases ( including PLL ) and 110 Parity cases. 219 in total.
I think that might be too many algs for my taste. Imma just stake with our current strat. Do people agree with that?
 
I would suggest you to use the Batch Solver as cube explorer's optimal algorithms usually have very bad ergonomics. Batch Solver can generate a set of algorithms at a time, and can also check for the alg with highest ergonomics.

Here is the link to the original thread, you might need to watch the tutorial:
 
  • Like
Reactions: hyn
I would suggest you to use the Batch Solver as cube explorer's optimal algorithms usually have very bad ergonomics. Batch Solver can generate a set of algorithms at a time, and can also check for the alg with highest ergonomics.

Here is the link to the original thread, you might need to watch the tutorial:
ur signature says 3x3 Qiyi MS

didn't u have a gan 12?
 
I would suggest you to use the Batch Solver as cube explorer's optimal algorithms usually have very bad ergonomics. Batch Solver can generate a set of algorithms at a time, and can also check for the alg with highest ergonomics.

Here is the link to the original thread, you might need to watch the tutorial:
Thank you very much! I'll try it out! Do you think it would be worth re-doing an absolute ton of algs just for this, or should I just continue with it?
 
Back
Top