• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easycreate your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

3x3 PBL Theoretical Method (3BL) (CFOP Variant)

U can reduce the EPLL on D cases to just Solved, Z and one of the Uperms using just D moves
Adj and W can D or D' to either Uperm, Opp is a D or D' away from a Z perm, and the Os have been accounted for
So it'll just be 63+2 = 65
D or D' just does 3 edge swaps so parity on bottom is easily avoidable
Also, if you don’t do W perm perm with aligning the edge perfectly, then you just get Adj. case. Just something to think about.
 
I didn't list the cases in order. All the numbers are correct tho.



Can you show an example of this? This doesn't sound right to me.
No, it is 132 cases. Everytime you have 21 in your breakdown, it should be 22.


What hyn suggestes is indeed correct. He means that if you have parity on the cross, you can do a D or D' to get no parity.
 
This is a really good theoretical idea! I'd love to try it out if we ever find all the algs.
 
Could you do EFLL (Edge Flip Last Layer)? Have a flipped cross edge, and then you do an alg to fix the swapped edges on both cross and PLL. Math: 1 edge flipped on PLL, 4 different edge positions, so (21 PLLs) (4 Positions) = 84. 84 x 4 because you can have 1 flipped edge, 2 flipped edges, 3 flipped edges, and 4 flipped edges. My math is probably very wrong, because 2 flipped cross edges and 4 flipped cross edges is 21 algs each, so I’ll just fix the math in the final math, meaning 21 + 21 = 42 and then 84 x 2 = 168. 168 + 42 = 210. Any thoughts?
 
Could you do EFLL (Edge Flip Last Layer)? Have a flipped cross edge, and then you do an alg to fix the swapped edges on both cross and PLL. Math: 1 edge flipped on PLL, 4 different edge positions, so (21 PLLs) (4 Positions) = 84. 84 x 4 because you can have 1 flipped edge, 2 flipped edges, 3 flipped edges, and 4 flipped edges. My math is probably very wrong, because 2 flipped cross edges and 4 flipped cross edges is 21 algs each, so I’ll just fix the math in the final math, meaning 21 + 21 = 42 and then 84 x 2 = 168. 168 + 42 = 210. Any thoughts?

You cannot have 3 flipped edge pieces
 
Been a while, but I think I’m gonna try and learn 2 look 3BL (correct to EPLL bottom and then correct to EPLL top) so I’ll be learning 12 algs, being UbUb, Hub, Hua, UaUb, UbUa, UaUa, ZUa, ZUb, ZZ, UaZ, UbZ, HZ.
 
You can solve the CP on both layers simultaneously very very easily
That's what I use for the method I developed.
As I don't know all algs I solve any cp with j/j cp just like on sq1 beginner and then ep in 2 looks, one reducing the top layer to phased, the other I do z2 and solve the rest with algs from epll and ocell

For cp i use this alg for j/j

 Twizzle link 
R2 U R2 U' D' R2 D R2


Ocell algs (i use the algs with all edges orientes)

To solve j/j I will put bars on front.
If i have just one adj swap I put one bar on left to reduce to j/j
If i have opp/opp I do j/j to reduce to j/j

Here you can try this example solve game
@Duncan Kimmett
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top