Easy / Lucky / Hard / Weird scrambles Thread

[mycube]

Pretty easy doubleXcross:

F2 B D L R' B D' B2 U' L F' U L2 B' R U R' L' U' R B' D' R2 B' R'

stupid scramble, doubleXX and OLL skip

x2 y'
R U2 L' U L' R B2 R' - XX-Cross
U R' U' R2 U R2 U' R - F2L minus one corner
U R' U R U2 R' U R - MGLS
and uperm

edit:
oh here is a LL-Skip solution:
x2 y'
R U2 L' U L' R B2 U' R' - XX-Cross
U' R U' R2 U' R - F2L-1
U2 R U R' U' R U R' U' R U' R' - F2L + forced OLL-Skip/LL-Skip

27 Moves

 

[Renslay]

stupid scramble, doubleXX and OLL skip

x2 y'
R U2 L' U' L' R B2 R' - XX-Cross
U R' U' R2 U R2 U' - F2L minus one corner
U R' U R U2 R' U R - MGLS
and uperm

edit:
oh here is a LL-Skip solution:
x2 y'
R U2 L' U' L' R B2 U' R' - XX-Cross
U' R U' R2 U' R - F2L-1
U2 R U R' U' R U R' U' R U' R' - F2L + forced OLL-Skip/LL-Skip

Something is wrong with your solutions.

 

[mycube]

corrected it. hope it is correct now

 

[Renslay]

corrected it. hope it is correct now

It is, thank you. Nice solutions.

 

[TDM]

My 2x2 average is about 7s. Then, I had these two scrambles, one after the other:
2.93[R2 F2 R' U' R F U F2 U'], 2.65[R F' U F2 U' R2 F' R' U]
New PB singles and Ao5 (counting sub-3). It was weird that they both had the exact same first face and PBL (including AUF) and were on the same colour (green).

 

[Schmidt]

TTW : 2x2x2 : F' U2 F2 R U2 F2 U2 R F' U' (stupid U' in the end)

 

[TDM]

TTW : 2x2x2 : F' U2 F2 R U2 F2 U2 R F' U' (stupid U' in the end)

0.08.
F U' F2 R F R' F' U F' is nearly the easiest scramble for a NL solve (unfortunately there's an AUF at the end).

 

[Renslay]

0.08.
F U' F2 R F R' F' U F' is nearly the easiest scramble for a NL solve (unfortunately there's an AUF at the end).

How so?

 

[Michael Womack]

TTW : 2x2x2 : F' U2 F2 R U2 F2 U2 R F' U' (stupid U' in the end)

SUB WR 0.55 Not a PB for me due to the solution being a 1 move solution.

 

[TDM]

How so?

For Ortega it is. First face is just inserting a corner, OLL is the easiest one and it's also the fastest PBL.

 

[kcl]

TTW : 2x2x2 : F' U2 F2 R U2 F2 U2 R F' U' (stupid U' in the end)

Lol .09 PB

 

[ben1996123]

Lol .09 PB

doesnt count as pb, not your scramble

 

[kcl]

doesnt count as pb, not your scramble

It was a joke dude, my real PB is .41.

 

[Schmidt]

Spacebar PB´s shouldn´t count, only stackmat timed, at least that´s what I think.

 

[TDM]

Spacebar PB´s shouldn´t count, only stackmat timed, at least that´s what I think.

Not everyone has a stackmat timer. I did my time with my hands starting not touching the cube; that's the closest I can get.

 

[Julian]

U2 F r D R2 D2 U' R f' L D2 f' F2 u r' B2 L r f U F r2 D L B' f D2 R' B u2 L' F' D F' R' B2 F2 r u' R

Had this for BLD

 

[TDM]

Two I've had today from qqTimer:
U R2 F2
U2 R U' F' R

 

[Username]

Two I've had today from qqTimer:
U R2 F2
U2 R U' F' R

Change from "optimal random state" to just "random state"

 

[TDM]

Change from "optimal random state" to just "random state"

What difference does it make? I wanted to take less time scrambling, so I went with optimal. Does it give easier scrambles?

 

[ben1996123]

What difference does it make? I wanted to take less time scrambling, so I went with optimal. Does it give easier scrambles?

not using optimal is better because with optimal, you dont need to practise or anything to realise that there is a 4 move solution, but if you get an 11 move scramble with a 4 move solution then you are less likely to notice it (like you were in a competition or something).