If Fridrich weren't invented, what method would you use?

[Zhanchi1]

Say fridrich(CFOP) wasn't invented, what method would use?

If you don't use fridrich, just vote the method you use.

 

[Ralinda4]

Probably Roux. I learned it after stumbling across Donovan's tutorial yesterday, and I think it's really fun so far.

 

[JianhanC]

LBL duh.

 

[MostEd]

Fridrich is so simple, it could not have not been invented.

 

[Lusti]

Probably Petrus, just learned it 1 week ago and its so much cooler than Fridrich!

 

[JonnyWhoopes]

Petrus. It's the first method I learned after some crappy LBL method anyway.

 

[drewsopchak]

ZZ seems like it has the most potential along with roux.

 

[Jaycee]

I chose the "I'd make my own method" option. I'd discover what is now known as Fridrich/CFOP.

 

[Noahaha]

Petrus ftw!!!

 

[Cubenovice]

Human Thistlethwaite

 

[Ranzha]

Probably Petrus F2L without orienting U edges, and then CLL/ELL.

 

[ThomasJE]

ZZ or Roux. If I had to pick one, then Roux.

 

[Aria97]

Roux!

 

[Edward]

Roux roux a thousand times Roux
I'm still thinking about switching to it AGAIN

 

[mrpotatoman14]

Probably Petrus F2L without orienting U edges, and then CLL/ELL.

this

 

[Thompson]

Roux is probably the next fastest but I didn't even know about it when I started learning Fridrich. The only other method I knew of was Petrus so I probably would've used that

 

[foolish]

Roux since it's the only other method I can do (apart from LbL of course).

 

[applemobile]

I would make my own method and call it Fwidrik.

 

[ZamHalen]

Petrus just by the fact that I can do it faster than Roux.

 

[cubeflip]

I'd probably be too lazy to practice block-building, so I'd learn ZZ and see how that is. I'm interested in learning ZZ and Roux.