OtaMota
Legend
It was a rhetorical question BuhLol, you are asking if you are a 2x2er on the level of @precompsubwr or Zayn
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was a rhetorical question BuhLol, you are asking if you are a 2x2er on the level of @precompsubwr or Zayn
Well, can you replicate a sub 0.3? Try practicing ez 4 movers, and I bet you won't be able to get a sub 0.3 even if you tried 150 timesIt was a rhetorical question Bu
What is your point @FineGeoduck2211 ? @OtaMota said it was doable for a world class 2x2er to get sub-0.3 and you’re incredibly insistent for no reason that it’s not possible. So far your leading argument has been to say that @OtaMota isn’t able to achieve those times. How does him not being world-class change the ability or his knowledge of the ability of world-class cubers?
Well, can you replicate a sub 0.3?
i'll replicate one in a bit and post it hereWell, can you replicate a sub 0.3?
I also might get Zayn to do one as well.i'll replicate one in a bit and post it here
i'll replicate one in a bit and post it here
on cam plsI also might get Zayn to do one as well.
on cam pls
How is the ability for an average cuber to replicate the skill of a world-class cuber relevant in the slightest?
While I wait for Zayn or some other cuber to get a vid of sub-0.3 running, here is a 0.31 by Antonieon cam pls
What is your point @FineGeoduck2211 ? @OtaMota said it was doable for a world class 2x2er to get sub-0.3 and you’re incredibly insistent for no reason that it’s not possible. So far your leading argument has been to say that @OtaMota isn’t able to achieve those times. How does him not being world-class change the ability or his knowledge of the ability of world-class cubers?
Damn even Zayn himself came out to like these bangers of posts!How is the ability for an average cuber to replicate the skill of a world-class cuber relevant in the slightest?
0.65Generated By csTimer on 2024-06-06
avg of 5: 1.13
Time List:
1. (0.58) F R F' R' U2 F' U' F' R'
2. 1.28 R U R' F' U R' U2 R2 F
3. (1.36) U' F R F' U R U' R U2
4. 1.23 R2 U' F2 R' U R' F' R2 F2
5. 0.89 F R2 F' R' U R U2 R2 U
Talk about easy scrambles
I don't even know eg 1
Any one other than me could get a sub 1 on all the scrambles lol
And pls don't write in the comments that y'all got a -0.1 on the first scramble and that y'all got a sub 0.6 on all the scrambles
It's a 2 move blue layer into pure L ollBtw you misscrambled the 4th solve unless you can predict a non diag pseudo layer in under 15 sec.which is unlikely
lol I didn’t see that cuz I don’t one look layers with double moves, LOL.It's a 2 move blue layer into pure L oll
care to show it now?My time was 0.32, not even sub 0.3
I'll show video tomorrow
It was the middle of the night how would i share itcare to show it now?
Care to answer my question?
ok, but chill, you don't have to use that type of languageIt was the middle of the night how tf would i share it
I'll try my best to show it as soon as I can
It's a 4 mover and you are turning as fast as. you can with good finger tricks, if you don't know finger tricks, then you are noob, not an average cuber, and since you know the solution, you are just trying to turn as fast as. you canYes, at least a sub 0.4 for an average cuber, I got 0.37 on a 4 mover, so I do believe sub 0.4 is possible, but not sub 0.3. 0.2 is the average time to pick up the cube and put it down again. If the time was truly 0.28, here are the splits:Care to answer my question?
sub 0.4 is not possible for the average cuber. The average cuber on 2x2 averages 5 and uses LBL.It's a 4 mover and you are turning as fast as. you can with good finger tricks, if you don't know finger tricks, then you are noob, not an average cuber, and since you know the solution, you are just trying to turn as fast as. you canYes, at least a sub 0.4 for an average cuber, I got 0.37 on a 4 mover, so I do believe sub 0.4 is possible, but not sub 0.3. 0.2 is the average time to pick up the cube and put it down again. If the time was truly 0.28, here are the splits:
0.1 to pick it up
0.08 to execute (50 TPS, like, fr, who in the world has 50 TPS)
0.1 to put the cube down
= 0.28
Going back to Phoenix Patterson "0.28" which was
6/30 frames = 0.2 seconds (JUST TO PICK UP THE CUBE!?!?!?!?!)
4/30 frames = 0.13 seconds (execution, 30 TPS, now that is something doable)
3/30 frames = 0.1 seconds (to put the cube down)
6/30 + 4/30 + 3/30 = 13/30 =
0.2 + 0.13 + 0.1 = 0.43 seconds
No, sub 0.3 is not possible on stackmat, with keyboard timer yes