Hssandwich
Veteran
One does if one's layers are inefficient.
One does if one's layers are inefficient.
Isaac Lai
Veteran
7 moves or more, that is.
Edit: Which, I might add, is exceedingly hard to one-look to sub-2 times.
Hssandwich
Veteran
Yes, so very inefficient, I always try to have a maximum of 6 move layers.
FailCuber
Veteran
Oh I was talking about One sledge/hedge cases. he got like 3 one sledge cases
Cale S
Veteran
http://cubecomps.com/live.php?cid=1288&cat=1&rnd=2
counting 5.78... is this the first counting sub-6?
also Faz didn't win the comp lol
counting 5.78... is this the first counting sub-6?
also Faz didn't win the comp lol
Jbacboy
Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2015
- Messages
- 432
- Location
- Somewhere on the internet
- WCA ID
- 2014CHRI04
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
I believe that he had one at WC 2015, but not completely sure.
Cale S
Veteran
Yeah, I just remembered that he did in the semifinal, and it was even faster (5.72). Also in another round he had a +2 solve that would have been another counting sub-6.
guysensei1
Legend
I've had 6 3x3 scrambles today with a solved 2x2x1 block, wtf
TheCoolMinxer
Veteran
I have to many solves in Cstimer, so ist doesn't open anymore haha. It hink there arme around 7000-8000 solves. I have to use qqtimer now 
Bindedsa
Veteran
I have to many solves in Cstimer, so ist doesn't open anymore haha. It hink there arme around 7000-8000 solves. I have to use qqtimer now
Clear your cache.
OLLiver
Veteran
- Joined
- May 9, 2015
- Messages
- 912
- Location
- Christchurch, New Zealand
- WCA ID
- 2015JENK02
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
chances of LL skip if you force EO? e.g. With ZBF2L, VHF2L
Torch
Veteran
1/1944
guysensei1
Legend
Has anyone ever attempted a Realman 2-4 BLD relay on a single 4x4? It would go something like this,
1) scramble as a 2x2
2) memo 2x2
3) solve 2x2 eyes open
4) scramble as a 3x3
5) memo 3x3
6) solve 3x3 eyes open
7) scramble 4x4
8) memo 4x4
9) apply 3x3 scramble on top of that
10) apply 2x2 scramble on top of that
11) solve 2x2 BLD, solve 3x3 BLD then 4x4 BLD
1) scramble as a 2x2
2) memo 2x2
3) solve 2x2 eyes open
4) scramble as a 3x3
5) memo 3x3
6) solve 3x3 eyes open
7) scramble 4x4
8) memo 4x4
9) apply 3x3 scramble on top of that
10) apply 2x2 scramble on top of that
11) solve 2x2 BLD, solve 3x3 BLD then 4x4 BLD
Cale S
Veteran
Not being able to orient the 4x4 would be kind of annoying, but I'll have to try this tomorrow
guysensei1
Legend
You can orient the 4x4. Just apply the 3x3 scramble over your chosen orientation and the stuff should work just fine. Of course you'd have to scramble the 3x3 part in your orientation otherwise it gets really messy when you start the execution...
Cale S
Veteran
I guess I didn't really look at the order, I was thinking you would have to remember the rotations you did before 4BLD memo or something like that
guysensei1
Legend
If you're memoing 4x4 last it shouldn't matter but if you prefer another order then the orientation would matter.
guysensei1
Legend
Since there's a thread discussing a case that 'probably will never happen but could', I figured I'd just ask this related question.
I've been thinking about what happens if some guy did FMC, and randomly wrote down 17 moves or so and it turns out to be the exact optimal solution. Since he randomly wrote them down, he can't really explain his solution, but he didn't cheat. Should he be given WR?
I've been thinking about what happens if some guy did FMC, and randomly wrote down 17 moves or so and it turns out to be the exact optimal solution. Since he randomly wrote them down, he can't really explain his solution, but he didn't cheat. Should he be given WR?
PenguinsDontFly
Legend
no. if you cant explain it, you're either cheating or super lucky and dont deserve a wr.
guysensei1
Legend
2x2 single, skewb single, and former sq1 single? Getting lucky is not a crime
Similar threads
