i dont have any money man, please explain!!!!

Lol it's actually pretty simple. All you have to do is look at the permutation as well as orientation of the pieces while you're orienting the edges and alter whether you use m' or m and u' or u in order to pair opposite pieces up. It's a lot easier if your able to do uf ub first as well as ur ul for your first opposite pair because it allows you to pair up any opposites you see in eo. For example: Setup: U M' U M' Solution: if you look at the ur edge and fb edge you can see they are opposites and by doing U' M U' M you can pair them up as well as solving eo as opposed to doing U' M U M, which is more fingertricky but doesnt solve the uf ub edges. Basically you just have to experiment around and figure out which eo cases pair up which edges and learn to effect them so that you can pair pieces up to skip the next step after eo. Lol I made it sound a lot more complicated than it actually is though
 
nice job at your first competition! you should pick up OH, with your improvement rate, you can prove roux superiority in OH. and distract yourself from beating me at 2H.

no. i will distract myself with 4x4! Sub 1:10 globally now with a 58s PB single 1 day after failing and getting a 1:22 average.

EDIT: im stupid and forgot to say thanks.
 
Hey everyone! For practicing blockbuilding, should I focus on planning every move ahead of time (for the first block) or just have a sense of where the pieces are and then find the solution as I solve? I've heard both things suggested and can't really figure out if one would be "superior" in terms of improving blockbuilding, since they seem to be two sides of the same coin. Which way should I practice the most?

Even though I've used roux since the beginning, I still think my blockbuilding sucks (takes up the majority of my ~35 second solves) and when I watch example solves I have a hard time improving from it since I only seem to manage to recognize patterns that I figured out while practicing on my own. Whenever I get a scramble that causes a lot of interaction between the pieces I need, I seem to get the planning wrong and need to make adjustments while solving, or I end up spending so much time planning that I don't really "understand" what's going on and can't apply it the next time (or so it seems).

So should I go for simpler solutions and tracking pieces, or stick to carefully planning no matter how long it takes? I've been messing up the first block so often lately, I started doing almost exclusively slow solves and don't go past the first two blocks. Is it just a question of practice, or are there any other things I can do to get more out of my time when practicing blocks?

A few more things... How bad is it that I generally pick the color of the first block from whether the center edge is already made or is only one move away? Again it has to do with me just keeping track of pieces easier that way, but I don't know if it's a bad thing. Also I solve with both yellow/white as bottom and blue/green for first block, I'm getting about the same times on both now but I wouldn't mind going back to just one color scheme if it's worth it, if always going for easy center is lazy and a bad habit then maybe having more options is just reinforcing it?
 
Last edited:
Very well written mr. murdoch. I would suggest doing speed solves where you plan the first block square, and then know where the other two pieces are going to be (preferably you should also know their orientation, but lets not get ahead of ourselves). when ever you come a case where you can not plan at least that far, you dont need to struggle with planing, just solve block at a speed where you can take note on what is going on. it could also be useful to write down your solution so you can rescramble and try for a better one. eventually, you should get to the point where first block is being planned fully every (99%) of the time.
another thing, if you come across one of those troublesome cases you should look for a better one somewhere else on the cube. if you can not find something easier, do that which i described above.
 
Back
Top