World Record predictions in the year 2020?

I guess I'll try.

2x2: 0.42/1.36
3x3: 4.02/5.91
4x4: 18.47/22.22
5x5: 40.15/45.31
6x6: 1:21.21/1:26.60
7x7: 1:58.39/2:04.47
3bld: 17.38/20.85
4bld: 1:50.50
5bld: 4:33.33
mbld: 41/41 54:14
oh: 6.75/9.00
feet: 15.49/21.58
fmc: 18/22.33
pyraminx: 1.02/2.22
megaminx: 32.84/36.96
skewb: 1.02/2.35
clock: 3.73/5.11
sq-1: 4.95/8.52
teambld: 8.33/12.08
 
Ronxu said:
I guess I'll try.

2x2: 0.42/1.36
3x3: 4.02/5.91
4x4: 18.47/22.22
5x5: 40.15/45.31
6x6: 1:21.21/1:26.60
7x7: 1:58.39/2:04.47
3bld: 17.38/20.85
4bld: 1:50.50
5bld: 4:33.33
mbld: 41/41 54:14
oh: 6.75/9.00
feet: 15.49/21.58
fmc: 18/22.33
pyraminx: 1.02/2.22
megaminx: 32.84/36.96
skewb: 1.02/2.35
clock: 3.73/5.11
sq-1: 4.95/8.52
teambld: 8.33/12.08
Click to expand...

Well I think this is pretty reasonable, perhaps even too reasonable... We've already got the MBLD and are pretty close to the OH single although I think it is fair to say that it will be a very long standing record.
 
2x2: 0.45/0.98
3x3: 3.5/4.5
4x4: 18.7/21.1
5x5: 39.9/45.3
6x6: 1:15/1:22
7x7: 1:59/2:05

I think eventually people will be averaging sub-4 on 3x3, but not in 2020
Someone will be better than Feliks
Someone will master 1LLL
Someone will discover a new speedmethod far superior to the ones we currently use.
 
3x3 - 4.46/5.82
4x4 - 18.76/22.85
5x5 - 41.42/45.61
2x2 - 0.58/1.30
3BLD - 16.41/19.74
OH - 6.88/9.44
FMC - 19/23.00
Feet - 17.46/23.21
Megaminx - 33.85/38.46
Pyraminx - 1.11/2.17
Square-1 - 4.98/8.31
Clock - 3.73/5.09
Skewb - 0.80/2.29
6x6 - 1:23.18/1:31.27
7x7 - 2:03.35/2:11.10
4BLD - 1:39.82
5BLD - 4:12.67
MBLD - 41/41 (54:14)
 
crafto22 said:
2x2: 0.45/0.98
3x3: 3.5/4.5
4x4: 18.7/21.1
5x5: 39.9/45.3
6x6: 1:15/1:22
7x7: 1:59/2:05

I think eventually people will be averaging sub-4 on 3x3, but not in 2020
Someone will be better than Feliks
Someone will master 1LLL
Someone will discover a new speedmethod far superior to the ones we currently use.
Click to expand...

1LLL? Thats just to many cases, and to long of a recognition time. As i have mentioned before, i think a new kind of 2LLL will be proposed, and take over. One with almost no recognition time at all (recognition for me takes at last 1/3 of my time). But, its in the future, so who knows? And Ive only been speedcubing for about a month, so....
 
Calamity Strike said:
1LLL? Thats just to many cases, and to long of a recognition time. As i have mentioned before, i think a new kind of 2LLL will be proposed, and take over. One with almost no recognition time at all (recognition for me takes at last 1/3 of my time). But, its in the future, so who knows? And Ive only been speedcubing for about a month, so....
Click to expand...

There's somebody already working on it. Check out BindeDSA on this forum.
 
joshsailscga said:
There's somebody already working on it. Check out BindeDSA on this forum.
Click to expand...

I never said it wasn't possible, i just said that it would have to long of a recognition time to be efficient. Do i think its faster than the current 2LLL? Yes, but there are so many LL possibilities (OLLCP, COLL. etc) soon somebody will come up with a another LL option that will be far superior to the others (i'm hoping this includes a PLL skip ;)). But again, its in the future, so, who knows?
 
Calamity Strike said:
I never said it wasn't possible, i just said that it would have to long of a recognition time to be efficient. Do i think its faster than the current 2LLL? Yes, but there are so many LL possibilities (OLLCP, COLL. etc) soon somebody will come up with a another LL option that will be far superior to the others (i'm hoping this includes a PLL skip ;)). But again, its in the future, so, who knows?
Click to expand...

Actually, I'm pretty sure he's said before that the recognition time is no worse than OLL. And when you say that a new method will be invented, I really don't think that's going to happen. LL is pretty constrained as to what you can do to it, and one algorithm to solve the entire LL is, I would say, the most efficient way to do it. I guess you could argue that better algs will be developed, but he is literally posting all the time about a new subset that he's generated to be more efficient or have better fingertricking than the old algs.

Edit: And 1LLL is basically choosing the correct OLL alg (out of thousands) to give you a PLL skip every time :P
 
Lol 3x3

Edmund said:
2x2 -.51, 2.17
3x3- 4.88, 8.67
4x4- 29.14, 35.31
5x5- 58.72, 1:08.55
Magic- .67, .75 (those maybe far too slow)
Blind- 28.11
Multi-bld- 21/21?! (in the 1 hr time)
Square-1 7.17, 11.93

Those aren't all. They all seem pretty crazy but hey! this is giving 10 years of improvement :)
Click to expand...

Well, we're not actually on 2020, but 3x3 prediction got so close!!
(4.90)
 
crafto22 said:
2x2: 0.45/0.98
3x3: 3.5/4.5
4x4: 18.7/21.1
5x5: 39.9/45.3
6x6: 1:15/1:22
7x7: 1:59/2:05

I think eventually people will be averaging sub-4 on 3x3, but not in 2020
Someone will be better than Feliks
Someone will master 1LLL
Someone will discover a new speedmethod far superior to the ones we currently use.
Click to expand...

*Looks at BindeDSA*
 
crafto22 said:
2x2: 0.45/0.98
3x3: 3.5/4.5
4x4: 18.7/21.1
5x5: 39.9/45.3
6x6: 1:15/1:22
7x7: 1:59/2:05

I think eventually people will be averaging sub-4 on 3x3, but not in 2020
Someone will be better than Feliks
Someone will master 1LLL
Someone will discover a new speedmethod far superior to the ones we currently use.
Click to expand...

Your 2x2 and 3x3 averages are very far off. Its been at 6.54 for like 2-3 years its not gonna drop that fast. and .98 2x2 average would need way too easy solves
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Kiwi_Cuber
Speedcubing World Record Predictions for the End of 2022!
Replies
0
Views
1,023
Kiwi_Cuber
Kiwi_Cuber
D
  • Poll Poll
World Records single predictions for the year 3000
Replies
5
Views
1,362
abunickabhi
abunickabhi
L
World Record Predictions for the year 2030
9 10 11
Replies
202
Views
26,950
Caleb Valenzuela
Caleb Valenzuela
Competition Cuber
World Record Predictions for Year 2025
6 7 8
Replies
158
Views
30,052
Cubingmadness123
C
O
Theoretical World Record Prediction for Big Cubes
Replies
18
Views
5,683
Christopher Mowla
Christopher Mowla
Back
Top