• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Should the Weekly Competition Fewest Moves event be run as mean of 3 or as best of 3?

Should the Weekly Competition Fewest Moves event be run as mean of 3 or as best of 3?


  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .

Mike Hughey

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
11,317
Location
Indianapolis
WCA
2007HUGH01
SS Competition Results
YouTube
Visit Channel
It is my intention to start allowing 3 attempts at Fewest Moves in the Weekly Competition at the start of 2019. The question is whether the "winner" of the event (and point scoring and Kinch scoring) should be decided by mean of 3 rules or by best of 3 rules. Remember that with WCA mean of 3 rules, while an invalid mean of 3 means a DNF for the mean, winners are still ranked by the best result for those who get less than 3 valid results.

Originally, I was leaning towards mean of 3, but lately I've changed my mind and decided that best of 3 might be best. We would of course track mean of 3 in the statistics pages, even if the "winner" is not decided that way, just as we do now with the BLD events. Going with best of 3 gives a slight advantage to those who do more than one attempt per week, simply because they have more chances to get a good solve, but still gives someone lucky the chance to "win" even if they only do one attempt.

So I'm now leaning now towards best of 3, but I could still be easily persuaded. Hence the poll - what do other people think?
 

Kit Clement

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
1,631
Location
Aurora, IL
WCA
2008CLEM01
YouTube
Visit Channel
The main argument we had against making FMC mo3 in the WCA was that it takes too long to do in a competition. We have a week to do the weekly competition, not just a day or two, so this is an even weaker argument here. Bo3 is too prone to be determined by which of the three scrambles was easiest, while Mo3 is better for showing an overall skill level across the attempts.
 

ichcubegerne

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2013
Messages
271
WCA
2013BOTZ01
Is this an appropriate place to motion for 3 mbld attempts per week (bo3 of course)? :p
Yeah to me this also seems like the next logical step. Then we basically inserted all WCA events along their WCA formats into the comp besides 6,7 who are ao5 (But they are only mo3 on the wca because time)
 

Mike Hughey

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
11,317
Location
Indianapolis
WCA
2007HUGH01
SS Competition Results
YouTube
Visit Channel
This poll has closed. The results are pretty substantially in favor of switching to a mean of 3 next year, and that also makes very much sense to me now, so I intend to implement mean of 3 for fewest moves beginning with competition 2019-01.

To everyone who participated in the voting: thank you very much! I hope this will be a nice addition to our competition.

Now to work - much work to do to get this implemented in the next 4 weeks! :)
 
Top