White KB

Premium Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2017
Messages
1,278
Location
Putting Runza on the map since 2022
WCA ID
2019BRUC01
SS Competition Results
YouTube
Visit Channel
Misscrambles: They're a problem. You've probably heard of the recent world records and near-world record solves that were disqualified on a misscramble either during or after the competition. Often the solver is not able to attain a similar result again. There have been cases where the world record has been able to be recovered, or "clutched," like Tymon Kolasiński's groundbreaking 4.86 World Record 3x3 average. There have also been cases (that are far more common) in which the solver is unable to achieve the world record average, such as Wang YiHeng's 4.74 World Record 3x3 average, in which the solver achieved 4 sub-5 solves and one 7-second solve-- truly amazing even for modern cubing. However, when one of YiHeng's times was disqualified on a misscramble, the average was no longer the WR average. YiHeng and his mother posted several videos going over the scramble as opposed to the misscramble and found that the misscramble caused almost no difference in the solve-- only the final move in AUF. Additionally there were 18,000 attempts removed in Vietnamese competitions stretching from 2013 to 2022 for breaking similar regulations that affected the competitor's perception of the scramble, such as using scorecards as cube covers which is illegal.

To begin solving these issues that are appearing to grow more and more common as time passes, we must first clarify the main types of misscrambles.

The first type is the malicious one that can be prevented. It's when a scrambler intentionally misscrambles a cube to make it easier or harder for the solvers in that heat or round, or for other reasons that the scrambler deems acceptable.

The second type is non-malicious but can also be prevented. It's when a scrambler unintentionally misscrambles a cube and forgets to check it against the TNoodle scramble image. Often this scramble is off by just a couple moves-- usually not enough to affect anything, but still a misscramble and therefore a DNF.

The third type is non-malicious and seems like it's unable to be prevented, but there are still ways to solve this issue. It's when a move is unintentionally applied in the process of the scrambler putting a cube in a cover, the cover being carried to a table, the cube being set down on said table, and the cover being lifted to begin the competitor's inspection time. These are the hardest to detect.

For simplicity I will refer to these as Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3.

The misscramble epidemic is not new-- misscrambles have been in existence for a long time. The solutions I'm presenting today as potential solutions for them may be newer but most of them are based on things already in place.

Potential Solutions
For Type 1 scrambles the solution is pretty simple: For every heat for which scrambles are being performed, have an extra volunteer look at cubes and have their only job be to check scrambles. If it's correct, it goes on, and if it's wrong it gets solved and scrambled again (in the proper scramble this time). Then and only then does the Checker sign the scorecard. If an unusual number of cubes have incorrect scrambles, the Checker can flag down a delegate and suggest having a different scrambler. Another way to further prevent Type 1 scrambles is do what many delegates are already doing: Only let the fastest cubers out of those who are not currently competing scramble.

Type 2 can be solved using the techniques used in Type 1, which is fortunate because this means if any error is performed by the scrambler they can theoretically be solved by both methods. I will also introduce another potential alternative solution for this however. GAN scrambling robots are a relatively new (and also relatively slow) addition to cube scrambling and very expensive, but a GAN robot is able to scramble cubes with pretty good accuracy as compared to a human scrambler. There are cheaper homemade alternatives to this and I don't expect robots to replace human scramblers anytime soon, but it's a thought.

Type 3 scrambles are the most difficult scrambles to solve at the surface, but the solution for this already exists and is widely used. What is this magical solution? Well, about a year ago on Cyoubx's Friends (a popular cubing Facebook group for world-class cubers and for delegates alike), and on Reddit and our own SpeedSolving.com, a different type of cube cover was introduced which is easily 3D printed and transported to competitions for Square-1 solving. This cover has a 12-pointed star design that prevents any misalignment in the scramble state of a Square-1. Within a few months this design was altered to include a rectangular opening going through the center of this to prevent any moves being performed after Clock scrambling. One thing that you may notice is that, in the solved state, a Square-1 resembles a 3x3. This means that this cube cover could be very practical for preventing 3x3 scramble misalignment as well. The version that would likely have to be used is the one without the clock design added so as to prevent slice turns through this space in the cube cover, but this could be very practical for most 3x3s. The only issues would be ones that are inherent with any cube: size. Special care could be taken to make sure solves on different sized cubes are performed correctly as compared to other "typical" scrambles, especially if they are too big to fit the cover or too small to have any movement restricted by the cube cover.

Let me know about what you think, WCA. I spent 59 minutes on this post and if these are all implemented they could very well prevent much more than 59 minutes of grief for solvers who would otherwise get misscrambles and have them changed to DNFs.
 
I don't think there should be an external checker to prevent misscamble's as that would take too much time I already posted my solution to type 2 misscramble's in the yihang yang WR fail thread that scramblers should check the Tnoodle scramble picture, maybe we could also have a delage monitoring to make sure scramblers don't do moves and check the scramble image, and for type three miscrambles that is a very good solution.
 
In the other thread regarding the cancelled world record, I also suggested an additional person to check the scramble.
In my opinion the checker does not have to check all scrambles but for, lets call them "VIP Cubers" (persons that could possibly break a record) all scrambles should be checked, the rest of the competitors the checker only makes spot checks to not create too much additional work and delays.

For the 30 second solver no one cares about a misscramble, but if another WR has to be cancelled it would be really bad,
 
In the other thread regarding the cancelled world record, I also suggested an additional person to check the scramble.
In my opinion the checker does not have to check all scrambles but for, lets call them "VIP Cubers" (persons that could possibly break a record) all scrambles should be checked, the rest of the competitors the checker only makes spot checks to not create too much additional work and delays.

For the 30 second solver no one cares about a misscramble, but if another WR has to be cancelled it would be really bad,
You can already feel that people wouldn't like this because they would connect it to discrimination/racism
 
You can already feel that people wouldn't like this because they would connect it to discrimination/racism
I think I agree with you on this point since there may be a world record holder that just comes out of the blue and if there wasn't a VIP scramble checker for that person the validity of the record may be doubted despite the competitor actually being pretty good. It would probably also be debated where to draw the line between good enough and not good enough. In some countries, this is 6 seconds. In a less-developed cubing country, this could be as much as 20 seconds. Additionally, if someone is solving and trying to get podium at a comp it's almost like they are being prejudiced against if there isn't a VIP scramble checker for their solves.
 
In many sports an athlete has to pay a premium fee (in advance, above the entry fee) in order to compete in such a way that a possible record will count as a world record. If you make it up to the athlete to pay an extra fee for a VIP scramble checker, it is no longer discrimination. The fee doesn't have to be big at all, it can be really small, and you can be sure that 30-second solvers will be unlikely to pay it. Even so a 30-second solver can still get a world record so long as they don't solve a misscramble.
It's almost like paying insurance to a shipping company when you ship a package.
 
Imo the biggest thing to improve miscramble prevention case 1 is to have the scrambler sign off that the cube was checked to the image. If the cube is found to not match, penalties be applied to the scrambler. That way it is in the scramblers interest to not mess up.
I'm not sure that this is any different than how the WCA currently handles things. Scramblers are already expected to check and verify that they scrambled correctly (reg A2d1), and there's precedent for banning people for intentionally misscrambling (e.g. https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/archive/forum_topics/2012). I certainly don't think punishing someone who misscrambled despite giving a good-faith effort to scramble correctly (beyond removing them from scramble duty) helps anyone. Perhaps those who don't take scrambling seriously and misscramble from carelessness should be reprimanded, but I don't really think a harsher punishment (like a ban) is justifiable.
 
I'm not sure that this is any different than how the WCA currently handles things. Scramblers are already expected to check and verify that they scrambled correctly (reg A2d1), and there's precedent for banning people for intentionally misscrambling (e.g. https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/archive/forum_topics/2012). I certainly don't think punishing someone who misscrambled despite giving a good-faith effort to scramble correctly (beyond removing them from scramble duty) helps anyone. Perhaps those who don't take scrambling seriously and misscramble from carelessness should be reprimanded, but I don't really think a harsher punishment (like a ban) is justifiable.
The idea isn't to just be punishing people. The idea is the possibility for it should deter issues and make people more cautious. For example, with Singapore champs, apparently people were emailed and asked to be very careful with scrambling to make sure issues do not occur. This clearly did not work. Suppose you can now DNF a scrambler's results if they are not scrambling correctly. That greatly incentivizes proper thorough scrambling and checking. Other things such as % of scrambles miscrambled vs correct could also be used to avoid punishing people who are typically good scramblers, but maybe something happens such as moves applied during running (which can be mitigated as well). The competition level and round could also be used as factors, where maybe a random misscramble isn't that big a deal in round one, compared to finals of worlds where a miss is unacceptable.
 
You can already feel that people wouldn't like this because they would connect it to discrimination/racism

You cannot play in Wimbledon, compete at the Olympics or whatever if you are not good enough...

In every other sport there are some requirements to meet if you want to play in the top league ;)

It's a very cool thing about cubing that the pros compete in the same competitions as the beginners, but that doesn't mean that the pros cannot have some little special treatment.

And I don't think that a checked cube is a big advantage as long you don't break a record and get it removed because of a misscramble.
Some misscrambles can also be better than the original, but as long you don't break a record usually no one cares or finds out.
It's still one of 43 252 003 274 489 856 000 possible combinations

And also with an unchecked cube you can still break a record, you just have a minimal risk that it won't count but that's how it was the last decades.
 
You cannot play in Wimbledon, compete at the Olympics or whatever if you are not good enough...

In every other sport there are some requirements to meet if you want to play in the top league ;)

It's a very cool thing about cubing that the pros compete in the same competitions as the beginners, but that doesn't mean that the pros cannot have some little special treatment.

And I don't think that a checked cube is a big advantage as long you don't break a record and get it removed because of a misscramble.
Some misscrambles can also be better than the original, but as long you don't break a record usually no one cares or finds out.
It's still one of 43 252 003 274 489 856 000 possible combinations

And also with an unchecked cube you can still break a record, you just have a minimal risk that it won't count but that's how it was the last decades.
But I would be crushed if it was my first comp and I got dnfs because of miscrambles and no vip checker :(
 
But I would be crushed if it was my first comp and I got dnfs because of miscrambles and no vip checker :(

Do you really think that someone checks your scramble afterwards and finds out that is was wrong?
As long as you don't put it to youtube, somone else tries do do a reconstruction and compares it with the other scrambles of the round now one will ever know that it was a misscramble.


I think in my first competition I've got the same scramble twice, but my second was slower and without video I had no chance to know it afterwards or to even prove it to get an extra...
 
Last edited:
Do you really think that someone checks your scramble afterwards and finds out that is was wrong?
As long as you don't put it to youtube, somone else tries do do a reconstruction and compares it with the other scrambles of the round now one will ever know that it was a misscramble.


I think in my first competition I've got the same scramble twice, but my second was slower and without video I had no chance to know it afterwards or to even prove it to get an extra...
At my first comp I got the same 2x2 scramble twice and I called over the delegate for an extra. I missed out on a 5 second PR but I also didn't want the solve to get disqualified.

(I ended up getting a PR of 3.55 3 years later anyway so don't worry.)
 
I do actually agree with a few posts above; personally I think the best cubers should receive special treatment. I'm not one of them, and averaging 13 seconds in 3x3 I have NO CHANCE IN HELL of making any type of world record and the same goes for most people who average 8 seconds. Personally I don't subscribe to the present 'woke agenda' in the world where everyone is afraid of 'offending' people. If something offends you it is your own internal emotional issue, not the fault of the person who offends you. I once dated a girl briefly, almost everything I said was 'offensive' to her. Each sentence had to be thought out well in advance to consider all the possible things that offended her. It was horrible and I just stopped seeing her. The statements I was making were not offensive to the average person-- just to her. That's her problem, not mine. Personally if a 30-second cuber is 'offended' or feels 'discriminated' because they don't have a VIP scramble checker, that's their problem.
 
I do actually agree with a few posts above; personally I think the best cubers should receive special treatment. I'm not one of them, and averaging 13 seconds in 3x3 I have NO CHANCE IN HELL of making any type of world record and the same goes for most people who average 8 seconds. Personally I don't subscribe to the present 'woke agenda' in the world where everyone is afraid of 'offending' people. If something offends you it is your own internal emotional issue, not the fault of the person who offends you. I once dated a girl briefly, almost everything I said was 'offensive' to her. Each sentence had to be thought out well in advance to consider all the possible things that offended her. It was horrible and I just stopped seeing her. The statements I was making were not offensive to the average person-- just to her. That's her problem, not mine. Personally if a 30-second cuber is 'offended' or feels 'discriminated' because they don't have a VIP scramble checker, that's their problem.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but the reason why the WCA regulations are there in the first place is in order to make every solve equal. In the WCA's mission statement (which can be found here), it says that

"Our mission is to have more competitions in more countries with more people and more fun, under fair and equal conditions."

Obviously, a VIP system does not ensure "fair and equal" conditions. My goal is not to be anti-offensive, but rather to better reflect what the WCA wants in their competitions. Every solve is equally important to the WCA, whether done by Feliks Zemdegs or some random Joe.
 
'every solve is equally important, whether done by Feliks Zemdegs or some random Joe'

Personally I would have to greatly disagree with that statement. If I go to a competition my solves are absolutely unimportant in the grand scheme of cubing. A fundamental purpose of the WCA is to recognize records. If you don't care about records then the WCA is largely irrelevant, just hold a big social gathering of cubers. A random joe who solves 3x3 at 15 seconds is largely irrelevant to the progress of records.
Further, regardless of scramble checkers, I still think everyone is solving under equal conditions. The only difference is what happens *after* the solve is over, regarding whether the solve is recognized as a record.
 
'every solve is equally important, whether done by Feliks Zemdegs or some random Joe'

Personally I would have to greatly disagree with that statement. If I go to a competition my solves are absolutely unimportant in the grand scheme of cubing. A fundamental purpose of the WCA is to recognize records. If you don't care about records then the WCA is largely irrelevant, just hold a big social gathering of cubers. A random joe who solves 3x3 at 15 seconds is largely irrelevant to the progress of records.
Further, regardless of scramble checkers, I still think everyone is solving under equal conditions. The only difference is what happens *after* the solve is over, regarding whether the solve is recognized as a record.
Well said. And yes, the WCA does care about records.
...But ideally they should care about all results equally. I think for extra checking it should always happen before the solve and also that anything that happens before results are posted to the WCA site affects stuff.
 
Back
Top