OLLs and PLLs: Do you know them?

[Jani]

i can get sub 15 Ao5 few times and sub 15 Ao12 once

i know all PLLs and 9 more to Full OLL

 

[chris410]

I recently started learning full pll, with 2-look oll/pll my averages are low 40's. When I timed my 2 look pll against the single step it was between 4 to 5 seconds on average so, the pll should drop my times once I gain proficiency with identifying the cases and execute the algorithms quickly. I do plan on learning full OLL at some point as well.

 

[mr. giggums]

I've technically learn full pll and oll even though I have learned only 7 oll but I use petrus so all I have to do is orient the corners. I average around 45.

 

[Brunito]

i know the full PLL but only 30.35 OLL i dont know how AVG OF 100 is 14.7x

 

[Carrot]

Full PLL and 29 OLL's... some days I average (of 100) about 15 and sometimes it's about 18

 

[rubiknewbie]

I knew full OLL/PLL when I was 30+s but knowing is 1 thing, being fast is another. I have a lot to improve on, like only recently did I learn U perm from another angle. It's quite different executing algorithms fast in isolation and doing it fast in actual solves.

 

[Rosette]

Sometimes I forget some of my

newly learned OLLs..

 

[gpt_kibutz]

22 PLLs (including 2 that take like 4+ seconds) and about 25 OLLs and I average 20.5 (have sub 20'd a12).

how can you know 22 PLL's?

 

[AndyRoo789]

22 PLLs (including 2 that take like 4+ seconds) and about 25 OLLs and I average 20.5 (have sub 20'd a12).

how can you know 22 PLL's?

Solved case maybe?

 

[PCwizCube]

Ew full OLL. Too lazy to learn. I know like 21 OLLs. I find it more entertaining to get better at F2L than OLL.

14 second average of 5 2 Look OLL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EQYcuWMI1M

 

[DAE_JA_VOO]

Dude.... 14 second avg of 5 with 2-look OLL...

Man I want that

 

[Cyrus C.]

2-look OLL, Full PLL. It would be kind of pointless to learn Full OLL, wouldn't it?

 

[Kian]

2-look OLL, Full PLL. It would be kind of pointless to learn Full OLL, wouldn't it?

Absolutely not.

 

[Cyrus C.]

2-look OLL, Full PLL. It would be kind of pointless to learn Full OLL, wouldn't it?

Absolutely not.

Sorry I should have added a , I use Petrus. But, I guess you may argue, it might help my FMC, what if I do bad edges incorrectly, etc. But for basic speedsolving, no full OLL is fine for me.

 

[CuBeOrDiE]

im 22 seconds and i use two look oll and two look pll. my focus is in f2l, which takes me 13 seconds. when i reach sub ten ill start learning oll and pll

 

[guitardude7241]

im 22 seconds and i use two look oll and two look pll. my focus is in f2l, which takes me 13 seconds. when i reach sub ten ill start learning oll and pll

you wont get sub 10 with a four look last layer.

 

[jiggy]

im 22 seconds and i use two look oll and two look pll. my focus is in f2l, which takes me 13 seconds. when i reach sub ten ill start learning oll and pll

you wont get sub 10 with a four look last layer.

I think he meant sub 10 F2L.

 

[Toad]

im 22 seconds and i use two look oll and two look pll. my focus is in f2l, which takes me 13 seconds. when i reach sub ten ill start learning oll and pll

you wont get sub 10 with a four look last layer.

I hope this post was a joke.

 

[ajmorgan25]

Learning OLLs. I've been cubing way too long to not know them. I'm ashamed. It's been my goal a few times in the past but now I'm truly set on learning them. Almost there.

 

[Mitch15]

I know four look, and all but a couple full one look pll algs, which im learning now, and im just starting to get sub 20 averages. i dont know if i intend to learn full oll for a loooong time seeing as id much rather get good at blind