My Quest for Sub 8 Petrus

[Etotheipi]

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what the preview button is for.

 

[mukerflap]

doing FB+DFDB is probably better for making a 2x2x3 in petrus
pros:
you can plan the whole thing in inspection every time
DFDB is RUr gen
rotationless
better movecount (petrus style 222 to 223 i got 12.46 moves out of an ao25 movecount (from cs timer solver tool) and from fb-dfdb i got 12.23 (intuitive)

 

[PetrusQuber]

doing FB+DFDB is probably better for making a 2x2x3 in petrus
pros:
you can plan the whole thing in inspection every time
DFDB is RUr gen
rotationless
better movecount (petrus style 222 to 223 i got 12.46 moves out of an ao25 movecount (from cs timer solver tool) and from fb-dfdb i got 12.23 (intuitive)

To be honest, that's basically LEOR now.
Why is it easier to plan in inspection? Someone please fill me in.
2x2x3 is rotationless too if done correctly
Well, thats a slight movecount difference.

Anyway, it's all for fun, so I'm probably not going to implement this. Anybody want to shoot down/give some points?

 

[mukerflap]

To be honest, that's basically LEOR now.
Why is it easier to plan in inspection? Someone please fill me in.
2x2x3 is rotationless too if done correctly
Well, thats a slight movecount difference.

Anyway, it's all for fun, so I'm probably not going to implement this. Anybody want to shoot down/give some points?

i can already plan FB+DR in inspection every time so it wouldnt be hard to add 1 extra edge
its only like that because i put up my intuitive solution against a computer solution

 

[PetrusQuber]

i can already plan FB+DR in inspection every time so it wouldnt be hard to add 1 extra edge
its only like that because i put up my intuitive solution against a computer solution

Hmm, ok. Why not have both be computer solutions for more accurate readings then?

 

[mukerflap]

Hmm, ok. Why not have both be computer solutions for more accurate readings then?

i did it and got 11.45

 

[PapaSmurf]

They're exactly the same in terms of movecount. If you have an easier 1x2x3 do that; if you have an easier 2x2x2 do that.

 

[brododragon]

Everyone listens when the smurf speaks.

 

[PetrusQuber]

Week 39, I’m checking out all my old videos, I’ll be revisiting Erik Johnson’s V2 tutorials, probably some Tao Yu example solves and tips, and @Metallic Silver ’s 2x2x2 block guide.

 

[PetrusQuber]

Poll up, I sure hope I do!

 

[Deleted member 51471]

Poll up, I sure hope I do!

Lol, it is almost sure you will, what really matters is if you'll quit cubing before you get there.

 

[PetrusQuber]

Lol, it is almost sure you will, what really matters is if you'll quit cubing before you get there.

I sure hope not

 

[Etotheipi]

You forgot to make the names of the voters visible so we can publicly shame the ones who vote no (Which there should be none), and maybe send some ninja assassin 2x2x3s to take em out.

 

[PetrusQuber]

You forgot to make the names of the voters visible so we can publicly shame the ones who vote no (Which there should be none), and maybe send some ninja assassin 2x2x3s to take em out.

I intentionally left that out, so that didn't happen lol.

 

[Etotheipi]

I intentionally left that out, so that didn't happen lol.

Oh, okay fine.

 

[ThisNameIsAlreadyTaken]

You forgot to make the names of the voters visible so we can publicly shame the ones who vote no (Which there should be none), and maybe send some ninja assassin 2x2x3s to take em out.

When you click "No", your computer automatically explodes. So, no need for ninjas

 

[PetrusQuber]

:O somebody clicked No. Lets see who’s inactive after this, that’ll tell us whose computer exploded

 

[brododragon]

I think it was WCC... Everything makes sense now.

 

[PetrusQuber]

I think it was WCC... Everything makes sense now.

Wait what? Explain?

 

[brododragon]

Lol, it is almost sure you will, what really matters is if you'll quit cubing before you get there.