PetrusQuber
Legend
It’s that bit where lookahead is most crucial from 2x2x2 - 3 sides where the pieces could be and no inspection.
My Quest for Sub 8 Petrus
PetrusQuber
Legend
My PB of 12.314 has just been broken, replaced by a 10.453 o_O. This is so cool... Lots of skips, knew it would be a PB in inspection, and it boosted my TPS and lookahead so much 
Scramble:
R U R L' U2 D L2 U L' F' D2 B2 R' F2 D2 B2 L2 D2
x2 y//inspection 0,0
R’ F’ R U’ L’ U D’//2x2x3 7,7
x’ y R’ F’ R//EO 3,10
y’ U2 R U R’ U R2 U’ R’ U2 R’ U R’ U’ R U2 R//F2L 16,26
R U2 R’ U’ R U’ R’//Antisune 7,33
R2 F2 R U2 R U2 R’ F R U R’ U’ R’ F R2//Gc Perm 15,48
U//AUF 1,49
I’m so happy with this solve
Scramble:
R U R L' U2 D L2 U L' F' D2 B2 R' F2 D2 B2 L2 D2
x2 y//inspection 0,0
R’ F’ R U’ L’ U D’//2x2x3 7,7
x’ y R’ F’ R//EO 3,10
y’ U2 R U R’ U R2 U’ R’ U2 R’ U R’ U’ R U2 R//F2L 16,26
R U2 R’ U’ R U’ R’//Antisune 7,33
R2 F2 R U2 R U2 R’ F R U R’ U’ R’ F R2//Gc Perm 15,48
U//AUF 1,49
I’m so happy with this solve
D
Deleted member 36445
Guest
I liked your gpermMy PB of 12.314 has just been broken, replaced by a 10.453 o_O. This is so cool... Lots of skips, knew it would be a PB in inspection, and it boosted my TPS and lookahead so much
Scramble:
R U R L' U2 D L2 U L' F' D2 B2 R' F2 D2 B2 L2 D2
x2 y//inspection 0,0
R’ F’ R U’ L’ U D’//2x2x3 7,7
x’ y R’ F’ R//EO 3,10
y’ U2 R U R’ U R2 U’ R’ U2 R’ U R’ U’ R U2 R//F2L 16,26
R U2 R’ U’ R U’ R’//Antisune 7,33
R2 F2 R U2 R U2 R’ F R U R’ U’ R’ F R2//Gc Perm 15,48
U//AUF 1,49
I’m so happy with this solve
ProStar
Legend
Agree, I might learn that one
PetrusQuber
Legend
I did a LOT of solving today (I think 1/5 of my overall solve times in Chaotimer were done today!), and I’m happy to say I am now sub 18 . I rarely get 18s now, and pretty much never get above that, unless I mess up big time. The main reason for this was was probably just my lookahead has improved a lot through pure practising, no FMCing or working on specific steps. By the way I also did some of my splits, here they are:
2x2x2: 2.806
2x2x3: 4.244
EO: 1.160
F2L: 4.737
LL: 4.554
I think next week’s focus should be the 2x2x3, since everything else seems to be going really good, but here is not (it’s kind of meh). Anybody disagree?
Plus, yeah I know, I’ve been really lazy with ZBLL, but by the end of March, I PROMISE to have finished all the T ZBLLs, and have drilled them.
. I rarely get 18s now, and pretty much never get above that, unless I mess up big time. The main reason for this was was probably just my lookahead has improved a lot through pure practising, no FMCing or working on specific steps. By the way I also did some of my splits, here they are:2x2x2: 2.806
2x2x3: 4.244
EO: 1.160
F2L: 4.737
LL: 4.554
I think next week’s focus should be the 2x2x3, since everything else seems to be going really good, but here is not (it’s kind of meh). Anybody disagree?
Plus, yeah I know, I’ve been really lazy with ZBLL, but by the end of March, I PROMISE to have finished all the T ZBLLs, and have drilled them.
PetrusQuber
Legend
Is this a joke????
Lowered PB average, had an 11 with counting 14
Lowered PB average, had an 11 with counting 14
mukerflap
Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2020
- Messages
- 263
Cool sub 14 ao50
fortissim2
Regular
I think you should focus more on F2L and 2x2x2 -> 2x2x3, you can easily get sub13-15.
PetrusQuber
Legend
Yeah, my 2 gen TPS needs a bit of work, and also my LS recognition (I sometimes AUF to see what case it is before doing it). My main trouble with 2x2x3 is just not being able to find the pieces quickly enough, and before I know it (in 2 seconds) I have to start solving it. More lookahead practise and inspection use will help out with that.
brododragon
Veteran
If I were you (and I'm not, I'm very slow), I would try to watch possible expansion pieces while doing pre-planned 2x2x2 to try to find the best expansion.
PetrusQuber
Legend
Thanks for the tip . I really don’t use enough inspection time...
. I really don’t use enough inspection time...
PetrusQuber
Legend
Week 23, I shall hopefully be able to sub 4 expansion by the end of the week, because my 2x2x3 is like the MAJOR weak point in my solves. Once that is done, I will also work on LS recognition, since I am meh at that.
P.S. I am still learning ZBLL, just doing it a bit more relaxedly now.
P.S. I am still learning ZBLL, just doing it a bit more relaxedly now.
brododragon
Veteran
Do you do the back or front slot first?
PetrusQuber
Legend
I switch in between, depending on easiness. Plus, don’t do CFOP style F2L, blockbuild a 2x3x1, then do last slot.
Edit: Meant 2x2x1
Edit: Meant 2x2x1
brododragon
Veteran
Random glitch: edits won't automatically show up, but quotes will show edits.
Thanks for the tip, but I don't get. You can't build it on the U layer, since inserting it would ruin EO. How else could you build it?
PetrusQuber
Legend
Scramble: R2 U’ R U2 R U’ R2 U2 R2 U R’
U2//Pair up
R’//Move pair out of way to insert edge
U’ R2 U2 R U2 R’// Insert last edge
Pair up the corner with any of it’s two edges that need to be solved, then insert that edge (basic way). More advanced solvers will pair up something at the same time they set up the last edge insert.
U2//Pair up
R’//Move pair out of way to insert edge
U’ R2 U2 R U2 R’// Insert last edge
Pair up the corner with any of it’s two edges that need to be solved, then insert that edge (basic way). More advanced solvers will pair up something at the same time they set up the last edge insert.
ari(a cuber)
Regular
not to be rude, but isn't petrus just cfop with an extra step?
brododragon
Veteran
Cfop is started by cross. Petrus is started by 2x2x2. The entire F2L is different
D
Deleted member 51471
Guest
No.
1. 2x2 (kinda like cross, but takes less moves.)
2. 223-EO-RB (just F2L really)
3. LL (Better than CFOP LL)
ari(a cuber)
Regular
how is LL better than cfop ll
Similar threads
