If Fridrich weren't invented, what method would you use?

What method would you use if Fridrich weren't invented?


  • Total voters
    175
Well, I use Waterman, but if Fridrich didn't exist, I'm not sure if I"d be using Waterman (even though that's what I voted for). I ended up switching to Waterman from CFOP. I'm not sure it would have been the same if I stayed with Petrus. I'm pretty sure I would actually be using Petrus.
 
I think I would have been too stupid to learn any other method without experience.
I seriously think I wouldn't cube. Maybe if I were dedicated enough, but rather not.
 
I chose the "I'd make my own method" option. I'd discover what is now known as Fridrich/CFOP.

that made me laugh out loud, and I never laugh out loud when I'm alone (which I was when I read it just now).

The thing is its not that I wouldn't cube, but I wouldn't speedcube. Speedcubing is now a big part of my life, but I never decided to "become a speedcuber", I just searched videos, and learned f2l, then 2-look oll, and so on. I wouldn't be a speedcuber if it weren't for cyoubx. But either way beginners method is based off of fridrich, so whatever the beginners method would be based off of, I would have learned that and learn algs to make that method faster.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How can anyone honestly answer the question in the poll? There is no way to know.

If the question was 'If you could retroactively pick your main method, without the option of CFOP, what would it be?' then I would go for Petrus.
 
Back
Top