Dayan vs. V-Cube Patent Infringement

[Ethan Rosen]

Perhaps lightake shouldn't have sold blatantly illegal products if they didn't want to face consequences. For the record, I'm not commenting on the specifics of the guhong/v-cube case. I'm commenting on all of the other blatantly illegal puzzles they chose to sell.

 

[CuberN00b]

Luckily i get a guhong a few months ago.
But i don't use lubix at my guhong :fp

Okay, this seems to be wrong. V-Cube claims GuHong violate their patent, but as shown HERE (The 3d print of V3) I can see almost no similiarities (what i see is dissimiliarities) between V3 and GuHong.

 

[Rpotts]

What makes you so certain the patent infringement they claim is from the V-3 Patent, and not one of their other puzzles?

 

[Ethan Rosen]

Luckily i get a guhong a few months ago.
But i don't use lubix at my guhong :fp

Okay, this seems to be wrong. V-Cube claims GuHong violate their patent, but as shown HERE (The 3d print of V3) I can see almost no similiarities (what i see is dissimiliarities) between V3 and GuHong.

Your have the perfect username

 

[CuberN00b]

What's wrong with my username?

 

[Ethan Rosen]

Nothing, it's absolutely perfect.

 

[CuberN00b]

Okay, even if V3 is launched, price will be high and shipping will take time (Because V-Cube is in Grecce). That's why people say that V-Cube's move hurts the community.

@Ethan
Thanks! BTW This reflects my slow time (sub40)

 

[Dene]

Okay, even if V3 is launched, price will be high and shipping will take time (Because V-Cube is in Grecce). That's why people say that V-Cube's move hurts the community.

@Ethan
Thanks! BTW This reflects my slow time (sub40)

He isn't complimenting you, he's indirectly insulting you.

And this situation has absolutely nothing to do with a V3 or shipping from Greece. The community is not hurt because the community can still get Guhongs.

 

[TimMc]

The community is not hurt because the community can still get Guhongs.

To be fair, there's a bunch of 14-year-old newbies who've just found out that they can no longer use their parent's or sibling's PayPal account to order Guhongs. The rest of us are either resourceful enough to use other payment methods or already have a bunch of Guhongs.

Tim.

 

[Sortsimies]

I'm sure that this question have been answered, but I want to make things clear.

What is the part of kastellorizo in this mess?
I mean like is he an employee of V-cube, friend, relative or just a normal guy?

And on the topic: I disagree with Verdes but IF the v3 was already released then it would be different thing.
I think that I will buy v-cubes but if kastellorizo is employee and behaves like this... I don't know what to say

 

[Nestor]

Just after I wrote my previous post, I went to Lightake to place my Christmas order.

$@#$ me... I saved for 3 months and precisely when I am about to place my order, they get hit. This is frustrating, but I understand that inventors need to be protected so I still say that it is the right thing to do.

 

[demma]

To be fair, there's a bunch of 14-year-old newbies who've just found out that they can no longer use their parent's or sibling's PayPal account to order Guhongs. The rest of us are either resourceful enough to use other payment methods or already have a bunch of Guhongs.
Tim.

I live in South America, I'm 25 years old and the only affordable way to buy cubes is from Ligthake.
I have two GuHongs, btw, but I was going to try a new one and this situation pissed me off.

Tim: what's wrong if hundreds of 14 years old boys newbies want a GuHong? Anything. Let everyone, from 0 to 99, buy their cubes.

 

[Zarxrax]

Wow, lightake too? The fact that they have taken down their ENTIRE cube shop suggests that this is going much father than just the guhong cube. I wonder what else is being taken down.

 

[theace]

No more cubes on lightake Hopefully, they'll come up with something better.

 

[Winball]

It's funny how we are all talking about a toy.

I can not see how v-cubes can benefit from all of this.

 

[prostx23]

Wow, lightake too? The fact that they have taken down their ENTIRE cube shop suggests that this is going much father than just the guhong cube. I wonder what else is being taken down.

Did they remove thier stock voluntarily, or were they threatened?

 

[Zarxrax]

Did they remove thier stock voluntarily, or were they threatened?

I'm pretty sure they didn't remove all their cubes because they wanted to.

 

[MTGjumper]

I'm pretty sure they didn't remove all their cubes because they wanted to.

It's obviously because none of the cubes were selling.

 

[Stefan]

Perhaps lightake shouldn't have sold blatantly illegal products if they didn't want to face consequences. For the record, I'm not commenting on the specifics of the guhong/v-cube case. I'm commenting on all of the other blatantly illegal puzzles they chose to sell.

Like which? I thought Lightake was their attempt to stay out of trouble, by only offering legal puzzles. :confused:

 

[prostx23]

I'm pretty sure they didn't remove all their cubes because they wanted to.

Understood, but if Guhongs are the issue, then why would they take down all of thier cubes?