• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Cubing fun facts!

brododragon

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2019
Messages
2,273
Location
Here
Hi, this thread is for all those fun facts that you can't tell anyone because nobody understands cubing. It just has to be in some, way, shape, or form related to cubing (so not like the thread created by @Aerma).

I'll start. In the WCA rulebook, there's a set of rules for how many moves the optimal solution must be to be considered a useable scramble. For pyraminx, it's 6. Guess how many moves the WR is. It's 6.

Note: man I need to get to bed it's 2:00 AM.
 
5-7 and megaminx scrambles can be 2 moves from solved, according to the subregulations following the one brodo mentioned.


  • 4b3e) 5x5x5 Cube, 6x6x6 Cube, 7x7x7 Cube, and Megaminx: sufficiently many random moves (instead of random state), at least 2 moves to solve.
Same with 3x3
Why do they even bother with this rule if realistically it will never, ever need to be considered? Even if it's just for formality's sake - why only 2 moves?
 
Why do they even bother with this rule if realistically it will never, ever need to be considered? Even if it's just for formality's sake - why only 2 moves?
I agree that it would be more moves. But it's there so that in the extremely unlikely case you get a 1 move scramble, you can't just lift your hands off the stackmat and put them right back in for a +2, giving you a no-skill WR. You might say it's faster to just do the turn (and it is), but I would for the +2 option because of nerves.
 
Fun Fact:
If you were to dedicate enough computing power to it, a computer could create all new kinds of 1LLL variatons, with some that are easy to recognize!
 
Fun fact: there are only 4 events that the winner of US Nationals 2019 was not the North American Record Single holder in that same event in the beginning of COVID, and only one event that the winner of Nats was not the NAR holder of single OR average.

Also Max Hilliard+Jeff Park=Max Park

EventWinner of NatsNAR SingleNAR AverageEventWinner of NatsNAR SingleNAR Average
3x3Patrick PoncePatrick PonceMax ParkFeetDRLDRLDRL
2x2Will CallanSameer AggarwalWill CallanClockScalpelEvan LiuScalpel
4x4Max ParkMax ParkMax ParkMegaNicolas NaingNicolas NaingNicolas Naing
5x5Max ParkMax ParkMax ParkPyraJohn GaynorJohn GaynorLuke Van Laningham
6x6Max ParkMax ParkMax ParkSkewbLeo Min-BedfordLeo Min-BedfordCarter Kucala
7x7Max ParkMax ParkMax ParkSquanEthan ErezJackey ZhengAiden Bartlett
3BLDMax HilliardMax HilliardJeff Park4BLDScalpelScalpelScalpel
FMCCale SchoonMark BoyanowskiCale Schoon5BLDScalpelScalpelScalpel
OHMax ParkMax ParkMax ParkMBLDGraham SigginsGraham SigginsEverybody
 
Fun fact that my Grandad, (who was a nurse) told me.

Back in the 80s, he used to see people with swelling between the finger and the wrist, caused by turning stiff Rubik's Cubes. It's a good thing we are past those days, otherwise I think we all would have developed this if not some form of carpal tunnel by now.

Article i found from 1981 to back this up
 
  • Like
Reactions: LBr
Back
Top