Changes to the WCA event list.

Interesting
The fact that the WCA has a "confidential reason" either means that they don't think it is a very valid one or that they are so "high and mighty" that they don't need to tell the community this. This is just sad. I will continue to be mad at the WCA until they become community-focused again.
 
It feels like the WCA already wanted to add and remove an event, released a poll to gauge public opinion, then disregarded the fact that most of the community really doesn't want to see events removed. I personally feel that "spectator friendliness" and the values of prioritizing twisting geometrical puzzles are weak arguments for detracting from a large portion of the community, and much of the impact will be felt at local competitions (where spectator friendliness is hardly applicable). If we're being technical, the name World Cube Association should most certainly be modified to reflect fundamental values regarding the diverse geometries of validated twisty puzzles.
If scrambling is a concern, why don't we talk about megaminx? I know many competitions don't run it because proportionately, few people even know how to scramble it. Same with Square-1, albeit more popular (this isn't an argument against megaminx being an event, as it should absolutely remain as well). You select the most experienced competitors to scramble these, and I'm sure people wouldn't mind helping a little more if it means the event could stay. If delegates and organizers don't have experience running clock or don't want to, then they don't need to hold it at their competitions. Easy.

It feels like a huge reason for this unprecedented decision was the World Championship scandal caused by a simple error. Any puzzle can have a misscramble, and it reads as collective punishment for unaccountability and unfair calls. In that case, it does not matter how many times you check a scramble if the scramble is wrong. Transport issues are still rare, and the vast majority used to be from pins, which are no longer applicable. Yes, a lot of people voted for clock as a candidate event for removal (still not the highest number of votes), but this was the separate question of: If an event were to be removed, which should it be? This is a subset of all respondents who overall strongly favored no event removal to begin with. The the number of competitors who voted for clock represent fewer than a third of all respondents. It clearly isn't in the interest of the community and feels like a very arbitrary decision. I fully support the addition of FTO, which most of the community seems to support as well; but removing a popular event (with far more methodological development, hardware, and public interest) is completely unnecessary.

The final note that other events will be similarly reviewed isn't reassuring whatsoever; for example, 7x7 and 5BLD. There are MANY people who spend massive amounts of time on these and main them, so should we not get too attached to any event we enjoy? The WCA needs to decide on a balance between commercialization and community, because if competitions and events are now contingent on visual enrichment from certain puzzles for views and sponsorship, then our broader cubing community is no longer the priority. When I started cubing, community and shared interest was of greater significance than results, exclusivity, and clout.
 
Last edited:
1784938440838.webp
 

Is there any more footage on the clock funeral of Euros?
This is the only thing that i saw with the funeral, there weren't any free clock chants unfortunately. I sat next to antoni's mom during clock finals and they did hold up a sign with #antoniismyworldchampion.

however, there were alot of people with free clock shirts.
 
Back
Top