TheSlykrCubr
Member
Who knows? I dunno.
What's your best? I wanna know how the inventor is doing with it
Who knows? I dunno.
I'll do an ao12 soon. I never really did much with itWhat's your best? I wanna know how the inventor is doing with it
1. 28.82 U F2 R2 D F2 D' R2 U B2 D2 F L F2 U' R2 F U2 L B'I'll do an ao12 soon. I never really did much with it
is l7e algorithmic?I invented WaterPetrus, but i don't know if it's good
1) 2x2x2
2) EO
3) F2L-1
4) Add last corner
5) CMLL
6) L7E
is this too long?
is l7e algorithmic?
how many algs are there going to be?yeah
firstly, EO in the middle of the solve is very bad for lookahead (unless you're doing Petrus EO and you can't here), F2L-1 and last corner is fine, CMLL, CMLL will disrupt EO and the M slice so that will never work, and lastly, L7E, algorithmic L7E, you mean WaterRoux L7E? that's going to be a bunch of algs I bet.I invented WaterPetrus, but i don't know if it's good
1) 2x2x2
2) EO
3) F2L-1
4) Add last corner
5) CMLL
6) L7E
is this too long?
how many algs are there going to be?
Not to be rude or anything but your method is worse Freefop and WaterRoux, firstly, 2x2x2, that's a fine step, F2L-1 we know freefop also does that but more freely, now the solved DF and DB edges are useless cause CMLL destroys M and U layer edges and L7E destroys those too.149 for advanced l7e
I could just not do eo, it would be less Petrus and more WaterRoux
yeah fair enough.Not to be rude or anything but your method is worse Freefop and WaterRoux, firstly, 2x2x2, that's a fine step, F2L-1 we know freefop also does that but more freely, now the solved DF and DB edges are useless cause CMLL destroys M and U layer edges and L7E destroys those too.
Around 2 active I believe, 1 semi active, and a lot more inactive.Hello everyone!!!
I would like to know, how many people are there in Speedsolving who are users of the Petrus Method?
If so, what prompted you to use Petrus?
I believe that the Petrus Method is a method that has potential, is efficient and a method created in an intelligent way.
Do you think the same?
I await your answers, greetings to all.
You and @ObscureCuber right?Around 2 active I believe
petrus is the most fun speedsolving method for me.I also progressed the quickest with it. I think it is only marginally worse than the other big 3 and still viable for top level (atleast sub 6) ((yah I know based)) but can probably not do consistent sub 5 like I think the other three can theoretically.Hello everyone!!!
I would like to know, how many people are there in Speedsolving who are users of the Petrus Method?
If so, what prompted you to use Petrus?
I believe that the Petrus Method is a method that has potential, is efficient and a method created in an intelligent way.
Do you think the same?
I await your answers, greetings to all.
Like you, I also think that Petrus is one of the funniest methods for quick resolution. The only problem I find with it is that there are very few Petrus users. Even so, I consider it to be a method with great potential to compete. Perhaps in the hands of a very fast person, who practices it constantly, it can reach a sub 8 or perhaps a stable sub 7.petrus is the most fun speedsolving method for me.I also progressed the quickest with it. I think it is only marginally worse than the other big 3 and still viable for top level (atleast sub 6) ((yah I know based)) but can probably not do consistent sub 5 like I think the other three can theoretically.
right now im focusing on nautilus though and am averaging 16ish with it.
nautilus: https://sites.google.com/view/nautilus-method
Like you, I also think that Petrus is one of the funniest methods for quick resolution. The only problem I find with it is that there are very few Petrus users. Even so, I consider it to be a method with great potential to compete. Perhaps in the hands of a very fast person, who practices it constantly, it can reach a sub 8 or perhaps a stable sub 7.petrus is the most fun speedsolving method for me.I also progressed the quickest with it. I think it is only marginally worse than the other big 3 and still viable for top level (atleast sub 6) ((yah I know based)) but can probably not do consistent sub 5 like I think the other three can theoretically.
right now im focusing on nautilus though and am averaging 16ish with it.
nautilus: https://sites.google.com/view/nautilus-method