Should the WCA introduce an event tier system?

[ProStar]

Why is everyone now making threads about adding stuff to WCA?

*cough*

As stated in the title, I think that a tiered system of events should be incorporated to the WCA. I personally like @Kit Clement's idea(actually I think he ripped it off from someone else), with three tiers:

Tier 1 - Must be held at every major championship
Tier 2 - Can be held at major championships, but aren't required
Tier 3 - Cannot be held at a major championship

The third tier solves the problem of people saying they don't want an event added because then they have to hold it at a championship: even if you are involved in organizing one, it's impossible for tier 3 events to be held. It still allows tier 3 events to be held at local competitions, so people can enjoy a puzzle as an official event, but organizers don't need to be obligated to hold them. It also lets all the different puzzles people want added to be added, and will lessen the gap between official and unofficial events.

 

[alexiscubing]

I think this is a good idea, but speedsolving extra events already kinda does this and you can host their events in regular comps

 

[Kit Clement]

I also agree that SEE basically works as the Tier 3 event list. It still might be interesting to have this within the WCA for extra visibility of additional events without straining major event organizers with holding even more events than the lengthy list we already have.

 

[BenChristman1]

I also agree that SEE basically works as the Tier 3 event list. It still might be interesting to have this within the WCA for extra visibility of additional events without straining major event organizers with holding even more events than the lengthy list we already have.

Could you please link the SEE's website?

 

[alexiscubing]

I also agree that SEE basically works as the Tier 3 event list. It still might be interesting to have this within the WCA for extra visibility of additional events without straining major event organizers with holding even more events than the lengthy list we already have.

Yeah, but to move all of this to WCA would take at least a couple of years to fully implement all the new events

 

[alexiscubing]

Could you please link the SEE's website?

Срок регистрации домена закончился

 

[ProStar]

I also agree that SEE basically works as the Tier 3 event list. It still might be interesting to have this within the WCA for extra visibility of additional events without straining major event organizers with holding even more events than the lengthy list we already have.

That's true, but I still feel like the visibility of SEE is way less than if it was the WCA. I didn't even know about it until I found out from you and Andrew. Perhaps SEE could become officially "certified" by the WCA, to at least make it more publicly known?

 

[VIBE_ZT]

My "yes" vote is conditional.

YES if there are a very limited number of events added in a year.

Adding like 6 events a year is insane for everyone.

I personally think that a maximum of two events (I could be convinced to change that to three) should be added to this "tier list" per year. This is due to the simple fact that devising guidelines regulations for events takes time and a lot of effort and voting and whatnot, as well as the fact that having a ridiculous amount of events would make it extremely difficult to run large competitions, even if the events were fast/easy.

Two is an arbitrary number, but it sticks out to me as a number that doesn't seem overwhelming, but is not only a single measly event.

 

[Kit Clement]

Yeah, but to move all of this to WCA would take at least a couple of years to fully implement all the new events

It's not a trivial process, but it definitely wouldn't take two years to implement all the new events. I also definitely don't think all SEE events should migrate to WCA.

 

[ProStar]

It's not a trivial process, but it definitely wouldn't take two years to implement all the new events. I also definitely don't think all SEE events should migrate to WCA.

Like, maybe, 3x3 bets?

 

[alexiscubing]

My "yes" vote is conditional.

YES if there are a very limited number of events added in a year.

Adding like 6 events a year is insane for everyone.

I personally think that a maximum of two events (I could be convinced to change that to three) should be added to this "tier list" per year. This is due to the simple fact that devising guidelines regulations for events takes time and a lot of effort and voting and whatnot, as well as the fact that having a ridiculous amount of events would make it extremely difficult to run large competitions, even if the events were fast/easy.

Two is an arbitrary number, but it sticks out to me as a number that doesn't seem overwhelming, but is not only a single measly event.

There are already guidelines
e.g. 2x2 OH is literally just 3x3 OH but competitors must solve a 2x2x2 cube

 

[alexiscubing]

Like, maybe, 3x3 bets?

I will be organisning a comp with 3x3 bets in late 2020 probs

 

[ProStar]

I will be organisning a comp with 3x3 bets in late 2020 probs

But do you think it would be a good tier 3 event? Also, I change my example to 3x3 W/ Oven Mits

 

[alexiscubing]

But do you think it would be a good tier 3 event? Also, I change my example to 3x3 W/ Oven Mits

I dont think it would be a good WCA event but i am happy with it being a SEE event

 

[alexiscubing]

SEE just added a new event, team cup (no regs yet) which I think should be at all major comps

 

[VIBE_ZT]

There are already guidelines
e.g. 2x2 OH is literally just 3x3 OH but competitors must solve a 2x2x2 cube

Yes but I'm talking about guidelines that the WCA would actually adopt. Yes, there may be guidelines, but the WCA probably didn't decide on them.

 

[ProStar]

Yes but I'm talking about guidelines that the WCA would actually adopt. Yes, there may be guidelines, but the WCA probably didn't decide on them.

They would literally be the same as 3x3 OH

 

[Deleted member 36445]

wait a minute...

3x3x3 With Oven Mitts?

 

[Sion]

Tier 3 bothers me. It should be alongside tier two honestly.

If records are being set on tier 3 events, when they do go to major championships, there's almost no point since a meta has been developed by then.

 

[VIBE_ZT]

They would literally be the same as 3x3 OH

Yes, in his specific example. Yes. It would.

But other events that aren't so obvious.

Of course 2x2 OH would be the same as 3x3 OH. But thats one event. It's irrelevant the event itself.