Yet another new 3x3 method?

[hawkmp4]

If they don't want comments on their method, then I think they should avoid posting it on a FORUM, where the entire POINT is to have discussion.

 

[Edward]

If they don't want comments on their method, then I think they should avoid posting it on a FORUM, where the entire POINT is to have discussion.

Constructive criticism/ comments are not the same as being mean about it.

 

[hawkmp4]

Maybe people could be less harsh...but there's only so many ways to say that a method sucks.

 

[mazei]

Maybe people could be less harsh...but there's only so many ways to say that a method sucks.

Perhaps he wants SP to come.

 

[Cyrus C.]

If they don't want comments on their method, then I think they should avoid posting it on a FORUM, where the entire POINT is to have discussion.

Constructive criticism/ comments are not the same as being mean about it.

I've only seen 2 mean comments so far.

 

[guitardude7241]

this reminds me alot of this^^ guy.

 

[vgbjason]

@guitardude7241 Looks like noob Roux to me.

Edward, your method is a basic corners first method. It's been done before (by me, and others, I'm sure.) It's cool, but nothing special.

 

[cmhardw]

Edward,

A method idea like this might have some potential as a beginner method. I'm currently teaching two younger kids BLD cubing, and they picked up the T perm as long as I presented it as two OLLs. If you're serious about the method, I would try to consider it more as a "beginner method in the works" if you really want it to go somewhere.

As far as fun methods that are slow, I like to use the "solve one color at a time approach". Basically solve one color (not one layer), then solve another color, then a third, etc. until the cube is solved. It's actually quite difficult to do.

Don't take the TICT method stuff seriously, these alternative methods are fun to come up with, and I think people can be too quick to judge an idea as "crap" if it's not super fast. I think it's fun to solve the cube in weird, albeit slower, ways too.

Chris

 

[Edward]

I will be updating my first post. Right now it lists the possible OLLs, and I'm working on the PLL's. Ill also be putting corner techniques, M edges techniques, and linking to an excerpt of a page that explains buffer pieces way better than I can.

I'm determined to make this a legit CF method. (I had no idea it was CF at first, but since it is, well...) I truly believe if I optimize a few things, this can be AT LEAST sub 40. (My first day practicing I was sub 65 with it.)

 

[Edmund]

Another one? So many timers.

Another one? So many methods.

Standing ovation for Chuck...

 

[Deleted member 4527]

I tried to solve the cube using a similar method a couple of times. You solve all corners, then using U perm/Z perm/H perm, and occasionally edge flip/OLL, solve all edges. I usually get around 45 seconds with this method and it's really fun.

 

[riffz]

I think I should clarify that my comment was strictly based on it being a speedsolving method, not a creative or beginner one.

 

[guitardude7241]

@guitardude7241 Looks like noob Roux to me.

Edward, your method is a basic corners first method. It's been done before (by me, and others, I'm sure.) It's cool, but nothing special.

You obviously haven't seen the thread where the video creator argued with everybody.

 

[nigtv]

Another method poll missing heise...

 

[4Chan]

Another method poll missing heise...

What method poll?
I see no method poll in this thread?
:confused:

 

[Edward]

Another method poll missing heise...

What method poll?
I see no method poll in this thread?
:confused:

Wrong thread I guess. I do it all the time. (But I delete it after)