Yet another new 3x3 method?

[Edward]

Ive been experimenting, and found that BLD has help me come up with something. Its very easy, only a total of ~30 algs if you do it right. 1 OLL algs required.

1. Solve all corners intuitively. This step should be very easy.

2. Solve as many edges you can on the top and bottom face using only M and U moves. This step should also be easy, and intuitive.

3 (taking stuff from old pochman). Solve the rest of the edges using only the buffer peices and the T-perm. The difference if, you can move the U layer to your liking.

4. Your top layer edges will either be swapped (M,U,M,U,M,U,M,U2,M,U,M,U,M,U,M.), OR Already solved, so all thats left is PLL.

Correction: After solving a couple of times, you do need some OLLs.


Ive looked around the existing method thread but found nothing like this. This method probably wont be THAT fast, but I find it really fun.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All OLL algs that your gonna need. (Badmephisto.com)

M U (R U R' U') M2 (U R U' r')

(R U R' U') M' (U R U' r')

M' U M U2 M' U M
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLLs
YOU WLL NOT NEED ALL 21 PLLS IF YOU DO THIS CORRECTLY. But still use these anyway
Ill be making my own list of the ones you need. Until then, just use the ones from Badmephisto.com. (An excellent site might I add)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

[Tim Major]

Yes, it should be rather fun, but not really a new method. This is basically just combos of other methods. I wish people would stop taking credit for "new methods". I prefer solving with roux/petrus/heise/ pure old pochmann for fun.

Nice idea though.

 

[blah]

How is it "intuitive" and "really easy" to do step 1 when most non-cubers can't solve a 2x2x2?

 

[Edward]

How is it "intuitive" and "really easy" to do step 1 when most non-cubers can't solve a 2x2x2?

I'd assume if you can learn the algs required, you can learn to solve corners.

 

[blah]

How is it "intuitive" and "really easy" to do step 1 when most non-cubers can't solve a 2x2x2?

I'd assume if you can learn the algs required, you can learn to solve corners.

 

[Edward]

How is it "intuitive" and "really easy" to do step 1 when most non-cubers can't solve a 2x2x2?

I'd assume if you can learn the algs required, you can learn to solve corners.

Thats not what I meant. If you can learn algs, you already have a basic knowledge of the cube, so it should be relatively easy to do it without algs.

 

[blah]

How is it "intuitive" and "really easy" to do step 1 when most non-cubers can't solve a 2x2x2?

I'd assume if you can learn the algs required, you can learn to solve corners.

Thats not what I meant. If you can learn algs, you already have a basic knowledge of the cube, so it should be relatively easy to do it without algs.

 

[Forte]

How is it "intuitive" and "really easy" to do step 1 when most non-cubers can't solve a 2x2x2?

I'd assume if you can learn the algs required, you can learn to solve corners.

Thats not what I meant. If you can learn algs, you already have a basic knowledge of the cube, so it should be relatively easy to do it without algs.

 

[rachmaninovian]

lol just another CF method. sandwich is better :3

EDIT: TICT IS KEWLER

 

[qqwref]

T perms? Ya serious? In a speedsolving method?

 

[Ethan Rosen]

ha
haha
hahaha
hahahaha
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[Chuck]

Another one? So many timers.

Another one? So many methods.

 

[Edward]

Would it help my case if I wrote a huge long post with an overview, in depth steps, and example solves?

 

[Inf3rn0]

Would it help my case if I wrote a huge long post with an overview, in depth steps, and example solves?

My opinion is unlikely.

 

[irontwig]

Sounds like standard corners first with a really inefficient way to solve the last edges. Also solving R/L edges is faster than U/D edges. Here's a better way to solve the last edges: http://grrroux.free.fr/method/Step_4.html

 

[Kirjava]

ಠ_ಠ

 

[riffz]

I think he needs to learn the definition of intuitive.

Sorry dude, your method sucks.

 

[Edward]

I think he needs to learn the definition of intuitive.

Sorry dude, your method sucks.

Its slow, but its fun!

 

[Cyrus C.]

This method has many pauses, high move count. This is made up for by using finger tricky algorithms... but even 600 fingertricks < 60 non fingertricks.

 

[Athefre]

I come back to this site after a few months and people are still so mean.

If someone enjoys something, leave them alone.