What could be the fastest speed?

[Coolster01]

Some of the best speedsolvers in the world have been estimated to have up to 17 TPS on average.

Maybe if they're doing their fastest alg... Not in a real solve though xD

 

[uvafan]

Maybe if they're doing their fastest alg... Not in a real solve though xD

In a real solve when they're doing their fastest alg they can reach it...

On topic though, eventually we will be more limited by our hardware than by our dexterity. I don't think anyone can say for sure.

 

[Coolster01]

In a real solve when they're doing their fastest alg they can reach it...

On topic though, eventually we will be more limited by our hardware than by our dexterity. I don't think anyone can say for sure.

I was saying that the entire solve can't really reach such an insane speed. That would require insane look ahead.

I think, eventually, some really good cuber who knows a lot about good cubes (such as cyoubx) could come out with "a perfect cube".

 

[uvafan]

I was saying that the entire solve can't really reach such an insane speed. That would require insane look ahead.

I think, eventually, some really good cuber who knows a lot about good cubes (such as cyoubx) could come out with "a perfect cube".

There will always be a factor as personal preference. Even as cubes start to push the limit, there will still be different feelings of cubes. I don't think there will ever be a perfect cube for everyone.

 

[guythatlikesOH]

This really depends on whether or not we're talking about high TPS during solving, or just high TPS in general. If an algorith is practiced enough, someone can easily get it up to 15 TPS or greater, but I would find it very unlikely for someone to have faster than about 10 TPS during solving.

 

[ben1996123]

Some of the best speedsolvers in the world have been estimated to have up to 17 TPS on average.

your lying

 

[Ross The Boss]

HTM is annoying

 

[davidx233]

Fastest possible time for 3x3?

The world record is 5.55 seconds. How fast is the fastest anyone can go for 3x3? are sub 5 singles possible? Is there a point where it is just impossible to go any faster?

 

[antoineccantin]

sub-4 is possible

 

[TDM]

I'm gusesing 15 TPS is possible, and if some can average 45 moves in a solve, then 3 seconds.

 

[FaLoL]

sub-2 nl

 

[Lchu613]

sub-0. Like a boss.

 

[kcl]

I would say a 3 second average seems about the max, and that's a stretch. I can see 4 second averages though.

 

[mark49152]

I would say a 3 second average seems about the max, and that's a stretch. I can see 4 second averages though.

So about twice as fast as the current WR average? That would be astounding.

 

[kcl]

So about twice as fast as the current WR average? That would be astounding.

I know

But like someone said, if we could get to 15TPS with around 45 move count, sub 4 is possible.

 

[Cheese11]

Is it really about the TPS and not about move count? If you can turn 6-7 TPS and have a decently low movecount, then shouldn't you be golden?

 

[KongShou]

Is it really about the TPS and not about move count? If you can turn 6-7 TPS and have a decently low movecount, then shouldn't you be golden?

no cos then u need a method with a really movecount

oh wait roux

5BLD just need to get his tps up

 

[PeelingStickers]

sub-0. Like a boss.

http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?44356-Negative-Time-Solving-Contest-2013

already done. Thread closed

 

[ThomasJE]

http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?44356-Negative-Time-Solving-Contest-2013

already done. Thread closed

Haha...

 

[TDM]

Since first reading this thread, I've found Snyder's website. He says he has a method which could average 30 moves. If someone can theoretically average 15 TPS, then they could average 2 seconds. But 3 looks more realistic at the moment.