• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Upcoming puzzles

GAN is going to release another overpriced 2x2
3 more you mean, and I already can't keep up with the naming. Next they'll name it the Gan 251 M V2 Pro Lite. Also, who would buy a $40 2x2. Probably extreme Gan fanboys. Just get a $20 flagship and be done with it. To quote J Perm, "Who needs a $30 2x2, get out of here Gan"
 
Presumably GAN sells fewer cubes than the other brands. They seem content to occupy the premium puzzle space, almost exclusively.
 
I think I know their strategy. Cube hardware these days is only making very minor improvements amd buying either brand probably won't effect your times much. However, by pricing it as high as possible, they are guilting you into practicing that event more, thus making you far faster.
 
I think I know their strategy. Cube hardware these days is only making very minor improvements amd buying either brand probably won't effect your times much. However, by pricing it as high as possible, they are guilting you into practicing that event more, thus making you far faster.
I know you're being facetious but I practice on cubes I enjoy turning a lot more so...


edit: I had no idea this was in the works. fans of original tornado get hyped
 
I know you're being facetious but I practice on cubes I enjoy turning a lot more so...


edit: I had no idea this was in the works. fans of original tornado get hyped.

At least someone got the joke. I too prefer puzzles that suit my preference.

Oh wow, I had heard nothing about this. Glad I held off on getting their new 4x4 so I can get both together. I really like the logo
 
I know you're being facetious but I practice on cubes I enjoy turning a lot more so...


edit: I had no idea this was in the works. fans of original tornado get hyped

I'm not. The mechanism is more similar to the GTS2 than the Original Tornado, which is underwhelming to me since the original tornado had a far more unique look among other cubes at the time, externally and internally.
 
that new Tornado looks cool

I ordered the new Zhanchi and still want a Duo... now there's a Tornado and new MoYu?

new 3x3's!!

YFuckKe.gif


that Tornado with red corner magnets is teh sexy
 
Last edited:
edit: I had no idea this was in the works. fans of original tornado get hyped
[SCS video on Tornado v2]
"I'll let you listen to how quiet it sounds"
>doesn't turn another quiet cube (like the Tengyuns or the Gan whatevers) so we have a point of reference

"new color scheme"
>doesn't bring out a different cube by the same company to compare

Not really calling out only SCS/Cameron here because almost every reviewer does these same two mistakes. For the first one, it's like… do you know people can adjust the volume of their speakers? Volume is an absolute scale, and you're trying to demonstrate it over a channel that's very much relative, hello???

For the second one, I've already complained about this before. Consumer screens/monitors (hint: most of the target audience use these) are almost never going to be calibrated correctly, and there are more insidious issues at work that can prevent the correct colours from showing up (hint: BT.601 versus BT.709, sRGB not covering full human trichromat vision, etc.).

Making these mistakes is understandable for newbies, but I think a shop calling itself "the original puzzle retailer" (their exact words) should have higher standards than that.

/rant
 
"I'll let you listen to how quiet it sounds"
>doesn't turn another quiet cube (like the Tengyuns or the Gan whatevers) so we have a point of reference

"new color scheme"
>doesn't bring out a different cube by the same company to compare

Not really calling out only SCS/Cameron here because almost every reviewer does these same two mistakes. For the first one, it's like… do you know people can adjust the volume of their speakers? Volume is an absolute scale, and you're trying to demonstrate it over a channel that's very much relative, hello???

For the second one, I've already complained about this before. Consumer screens/monitors (hint: most of the target audience use these) are almost never going to be calibrated correctly, and there are more insidious issues at work that can prevent the correct colours from showing up (hint: BT.601 versus BT.709, sRGB not covering full human trichromat vision, etc.).

Making these mistakes is understandable for newbies, but I think a shop calling itself "the original puzzle retailer" (their exact words) should have higher standards than that.

/rant

both your points are very true. sound is heavily dependent on the recording setup, but also lube setup (which I think qiyi did beforehand) and turning speed

also I noticed beyond complex color space issues which I'm not going to criticize SCS over, SCS videos have a weird saturated color temperature where puzzles I know are standard blue appear lighter blue and slightly green. the rest of the colors appear fine to me but the blue always sticks out to me as not realistic appearing.

Screenshot from 2021-05-12 00-00-31.png

1620792086054.png


I feel like scs and sometimes thecubicle make their puzzles appear brighter than they appear to me in person. maybe that's just my crappy lighting? but ziicube's picture looks a lot closer to my vision.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top