• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Upcoming 3x3s

This is disappointing. Some cube makers apparently still have issues with computer technology matters today and can't get everything needed in a smartcube to work smoothly, consistently, reliably and long term. Hardware like sensors, software, network, connection, or whatever the problem, it is hard to understand why they can be so difficult after generations of products. It's also disappointing that Cubeast is not working with the Weilong V10 AI and not with the QiYi smartcubes either, from what I heard. These are toys and it should be Plug n Play.

 
Last edited:
This is disappointing. Some cube makers apparently still have issues with computer technology matters today and can't get everything needed in a smartcube to work smoothly, consistently, reliably and long term. Hardware like sensors, software, network, connection, or whatever the problem, it is hard to understand why they can be so difficult after generations of products. It's also disappointing that Cubeast is not working with the Weilong V10 AI and not with the QiYi smartcubes either, from what I heard. These are toys and it should be Plug n Play.
They want to force people to use their own apps.
 
They want to force people to use their own apps.

True, but I think they also want to be able to sell their products before other considerations. Hopefully there will be one day some sort of standard interfaces, so that independent products can work together. At this time, only Gan has enough volume of sales of smartcubes to be able to maintain or fund a proper level of quality and support service. Poor software quality in particular means low sales, and low sales lead to poor quality and support. So the other makers need to either invest heavily and or rely on others to get technical features and software working smoothly first to get started IMO.

The GoCube is actually very reliable and has worked well, but it seems to be a one-product wonder, and hasn't bothered to do anything since. The physical cube also leaves a lot to be desired.
 
Last edited:

What's interesting is that we have again a question about the value of maglev. This XT3, like the Tornado V4, and also the earlier V3, has been found by many to be better in the Spring (Flagship) version. The Moyu V9 is also better based on numerous reviews to be better when the Maglev was replaced by just springs (Picube Special Edition). So, is Maglev just a marketing gimmick as it only means hard to control excessive speed, more weight and higher prices?
 

What's interesting is that we have again a question about the value of maglev. This XT3, like the Tornado V4, and also the earlier V3, has been found by many to be better in the Spring (Flagship) version. The Moyu V9 is also better based on numerous reviews to be better when the Maglev was replaced by just springs (Picube Special Edition). So, is Maglev just a marketing gimmick as it only means hard to control excessive speed, more weight and higher prices?
Maglev does work well in some cubes though. The Gan 12 is fast but still very controllable with good setting and has set a lot of records. RSV5, YS3M and other Gan cubes are all good with maglev.
 
Maglev does work well in some cubes though. The Gan 12 is fast but still very controllable with good setting and has set a lot of records. RSV5, YS3M and other Gan cubes are all good with maglev.

Yes, I can see that Maglev does work well in some cubes. The point is that with a good design, springs seem just fine for the best performance. That means Maglev is not exactly the breakthrough it has been hyped as. It has been several generations already. Edge repelling magnets and now the new repelling ones in Tornado V4 Pioneer are also interesting and giving alternatives but they have not really resulted in performance results that
 
Yes, I can see that Maglev does work well in some cubes. The point is that with a good design, springs seem just fine for the best performance. That means Maglev is not exactly the breakthrough it has been hyped as. It has been several generations already. Edge repelling magnets and now the new repelling ones in Tornado V4 Pioneer are also interesting and giving alternatives but they have not really resulted in performance results that
that what?
 
Yes, I can see that Maglev does work well in some cubes. The point is that with a good design, springs seem just fine for the best performance. That means Maglev is not exactly the breakthrough it has been hyped as. It has been several generations already. Edge repelling magnets and now the new repelling ones in Tornado V4 Pioneer are also interesting and giving alternatives but they have not really resulted in performance results that
I consider core magnets to be the last hardware improvement, and not a big one (for 3x3s). I'm pretty sure a WR M 2019 and GAN X/XS are perfectly competitive nowadays (except for maybe Yiheng who uses extremely light and loose cubes)
 
Back
Top